Well, common sense vanished last year when all those BLM marches (and during a pandemic at that!) caused thugs to join in with looting and arson.Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
They can't even prove it's racist or anti-BLM. They're just flapping their gums per reflex action. Automatically associating "anti-riot bill" to "RACISM!!!" without a shred of proof.The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
Responding to the bolded: Good question. I can't find the official text of the bill, so it's impossible to say how broad they are willing to define "rioting".Ill have to read the bill and see what it says but if the verbiage here is accurate I see nothing racist about it
"increase penalties for rioting or looting" . . .seems just fine to me
BUT how loosely are those defined . . . thats the question
Responding to the bolded: Good question. I can't find the official text of the bill, so it's impossible to say how broad they are willing to define "rioting".
What makes it racist? Nothing. This is the left crying because they recognize that BLM and other rioters often tend to be black. So it's not about fairness it's more about affirmative action, lowering the standards for black equality. How about we adhere to strong standards and expect everyone to meet them.The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
<> This is the left crying <>
Why are you trying to derail this thread with irrelevant pictures?It must be really easy to own the libtards when your lordship can make all of them responsible for the acts of any individuals you say are on the left. But watch this, I can totally own the right. This is the right showing conservative pride:
Get it?
Bet you don't, Mr. "Integrityrespec".
The ACLU's credibility went by the boards after they called the Second Amendment "racist". All they are doing is pandering to the Cancel Cultists.Whenever ACLU makes a claim about civil rights, I pay extra attention because they have a record of fighting legislation by both republicans and democrats. People should recall that when Obama was pushing "red flag" gun restrictions, the ACLU opposed the bill as being too broad and believed that would harm the 2ns amendment righits of people stiggmatized with some mental problem. So, anybody who claims that the ACLU has a pro-black or proggessive agenda should not rush to conclusions.
Why are you trying to derail this thread with irrelevant pictures?
The ACLU's credibility went by the boards after they called the Second Amendment "racist". All they are doing is pandering to the Cancel Cultists.
If the law is just aimed at penalties for rioting and looting, then it's fine. There have been issues with rioting and looting as of late. It's not aimed at any particular group. I mean, I haven't read anything on the law, so it's under the assumption that it's just aimed at the penalties for rioting and looting. Now it could be that they're expanding what the definition of "riot" is that might catch up peaceful protest and perhaps there's room for argument there; again I haven't seen anything about this bill.The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
The ACLU's credibility went by the boards after they called the Second Amendment "racist". All they are doing is pandering to the Cancel Cultists.
The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
Reading the text of the bill, it seems North Carolina isnt redefining rioting and looting, they are simply increasing the penalties by making it a felony.If the law is just aimed at penalties for rioting and looting, then it's fine. There have been issues with rioting and looting as of late. It's not aimed at any particular group. I mean, I haven't read anything on the law, so it's under the assumption that it's just aimed at the penalties for rioting and looting. Now it could be that they're expanding what the definition of "riot" is that might catch up peaceful protest and perhaps there's room for argument there; again I haven't seen anything about this bill.
Seems NC is making it a felony now.I thought righties (not you) were all about enforcing the laws already on the books. Is it legal to riot in North Carolina?
The ACLU and activists are slamming a North Carolina anti-rioting bill that would increase penalties for rioting or looting as "racist" and "anti-Black Lives Matter" "This bill HB805 is racist. It’s an anti-Black Lives Matter bill," attorney Dawn Blagrove of the activist group Emancipate NC told WNCN. House Bill 805 was sponsored by Republican North Carolina Speaker of the House Tim Moore after Raleigh saw riots last summer as protests and riots swept the country following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
No.....just, no.
Critical thinking and common sense has completely vanished when a law aimed at rioting and looting is deemed "racist" or "anti BLM"......no one who has even a casual relationship with reality would make or defend that statement
Ill have to read the bill and see what it says but if the verbiage here is accurate I see nothing racist about it
"increase penalties for rioting or looting" . . .seems just fine to me
BUT how loosely are those defined . . . thats the question
also since ive been to multiple BLM rallies now and 2 were mostly white people and one was about 60 or 70/30 . . black/white again it would be hard to say racists against BLM a movement supported by the majority of america. lol
Ill have to read the bill later when i can and recomment.
Reading the text of the bill, it seems North Carolina isnt redefining rioting and looting, they are simply increasing the penalties by making it a felony.
"§ 14-288.2. Riot; inciting to riot; punishments.
(a) A riot is a public disturbance involving an assemblage of three or more persons which
by disorderly and violent conduct, or the imminent threat of disorderly and violent conduct,
results in injury or damage to persons or property or creates a clear and present danger of injury
or damage to persons or property.
The argument sounded stupid at first blush - obviously, there's nothing "racist" or wrong about punishing actual rioters for rioting - but maybe / maybe not. I imagine the angle is something like what Ikari said.So reading through the bill seems ok to me. The red parts make it fine by me.
Now im not a fan of the yellow parts simply because what the hell is "urging" in a factual LEGAL sense lol . . .seems VERY vague
im not familiar with riot law/bills maybe this is common but i certainly see nothing racist about it and most definitely nothing anti-BLM.
is there something anybody else sees that is to vague and could be turned on any or all assemblies?
May 4, 2021
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT TO INCREASE THE PENALTIES FOR RIOTING OR INCITING RIOTING THAT
CAUSES DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, SERIOUS BODILY INJURY, OR DEATH AND
ASSAULTING EMERGENCY PERSONNEL DURING A RIOT OR STATE OF
EMERGENCY; TO ALLOW RECOVERY OF TREBLE DAMAGES FOR PROPERTY
DAMAGE OR PERSONAL INJURY CAUSED BY RIOTING OR LOOTING; AND TO
REQUIRE PRETRIAL RELEASE CONDITIONS FOR RIOTING AND LOOTING
OFFENSES TO BE DETERMINED BY A JUDGE.
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 14-288.2 reads as rewritten:
"§ 14-288.2. Riot; inciting to riot; punishments.
(a) A riot is a public disturbance involving an assemblage of three or more persons which
by disorderly and violent conduct, or the imminent threat of disorderly and violent conduct,
results in injury or damage to persons or property or creates a clear and present danger of injury
or damage to persons or property.
(e) Any person who willfully incites or urges another to engage in a riot, and such inciting
or urging is a contributing cause of a riot in which there is property damage in excess of fifteen
hundred dollars ($1,500) or serious bodily injury,shall be punished as a Class F felon.shall be
guilty of a Class E felony.
(e1) Any person who willfully incites or urges another to engage in a riot, and such inciting
or urging causes a death, shall be guilty of a Class D felony.
it was before in some cases and jurisdictionsWoot. A bar brawl is now a felony.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?