• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Abortion can't be allowed after 16 weeks of pregnancy.

ColdHardTruth said:
That is not correct.

www.babymed.com

What Is a Viable Pregnancy and a Nonviable Pregnancy?

The term "viability" may apply to the baby potentially surviving if born prematurely, and it also may mean that the fetus is still alive inside the uterus.
www.babymed.com
Click to expand...

Yes I am correct. The unborn, from fertilization/implantation, is alive.

No one said anything about viability. And it's certainly not viable at 16 weeks. Stay in your lane.
 
texasgirl said:
What is she wants it because she doesn't want babies?
Click to expand...
If that’s the case, then she would most certainly abort it as soon as she knew she was pregnant.
Who would go through the arduous and risky process of pregnancy if they didn‘t want a baby? Would you?
 
AGENT J said:
Of course can, it already is and should be 🤷‍♂️

now with that said in America the super vast majority hapen before then anyway about 95% but that doesnt mean they cant and shouldnt . . 99% happen before 20 weeks
in fact the ones that happen after are the ones that need the most protection because they arent on a whim most are done for very specific reasons
Click to expand...
Don’t try to confound them with logic and reason.

It’s not fair!
 
texasgirl said:
What is she wants it because she doesn't want babies?
Click to expand...
Spend the money y’all spend trying to ban abortion developing an artificial womb.

Then y’all can pop the fetus out and throw it in the mecha womb and you can deal with it from there if it’s so important to you.
 
Lursa said:
Yes I am correct. The unborn, from fertilization/implantation, is alive.
Click to expand...
That is a religious opinion and not that of science.

This is an example of why religion must not be allowed to interfere in government.

Lursa said:
No one said anything about viability. And it's certainly not viable at 16 weeks. Stay in your lane.
Click to expand...

Read the article.
 
Lursa said:
Ok, if you mean that mine is the one that's based on biology...yep.
Click to expand...

No, I mean that opinion is based on religious belief and has NOTHING to do with science. You were aware of that.

Lursa said:
I agree.



Nah
Click to expand...

Then your argument automatically fails are your "argument" is dismissed as baseless religious prattle from the right.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
No, I mean that opinion is based on religious belief and has NOTHING to do with science. You were aware of that.
Click to expand...

Again, if you are referring to my posts, I stated the biological fact that the unborn is alive, and an individual organism, from the time of fertilization/implantation.

That has nothing to do with religion.

ColdHardTruth said:
Then your argument automatically fails are your "argument" is dismissed as baseless religious prattle from the right.
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are talking about...except that I posted scientific fact and not 'religious prattle.' Perhaps you need a dictionary for 'live?' Meaning something is alive, it's a living thing. The unborn developing inside a woman is not 'dead' nor a non-living thing. :rolleyes:
 
Lursa said:
Again, if you are referring to my posts, I stated the biological fact that the unborn is alive, and an individual organism, from the time of fertilization/implantation.
Click to expand...

No, you didn't. You posted a religious thought process. Until viability, it's little more than a collection of cells. It doesn't have any rights and is not a person. This is the science of it. Stating otherwise is unscientific folly.

Lursa said:
That has nothing to do with religion.
Click to expand...
Your thought process comes from religious beliefs and not science.

Lursa said:
I have no idea what you are talking about...except that I posted scientific fact and not 'religious prattle.' Perhaps you need a dictionary for 'live?' Meaning something is alive, it's a living thing. The unborn developing inside a woman is not 'dead' nor a non-living thing. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No, you did not post facts. You posted an opinion. When I posted an article that proves you were incorrect, you refused to read it. This effectively defeated your point.
 
texasgirl said:
After 16 weeks, the baby starts life.
Click to expand...
What baby? Based on what?
texasgirl said:
Abortion can't be allowed after 16 weeks of pregnancy.
Click to expand...
Why not?
texasgirl said:
Science
Click to expand...
Cite it!
texasgirl said:
You sound like a supporter of abortion. Are you?
Click to expand...
I support a woman's right to choose.
texasgirl said:
What is she wants it because she doesn't want babies?
Click to expand...
So? If she wants an abortion, she should be allowed to have one.
 
ColdHardTruth said:
No, you didn't. You posted a religious thought process. Until viability, it's little more than a collection of cells. It doesn't have any rights and is not a person. This is the science of it. Stating otherwise is unscientific folly.
Click to expand...

I never said it had rights or was a person. Read better, I said it was alive. I posted biological fact. Feel free to quote where I associated the unborn with any rights or personhood?


Absolutely wrong, as I just showed above and in each of my previous posts. You repeating yourself doesnt change that. The unborn, from fertilization/implantation is a living thing. It's a life, it's alive. That's biological fact.

ColdHardTruth said:
No, you did not post facts. You posted an opinion. When I posted an article that proves you were incorrect, you refused to read it. This effectively defeated your point.
Click to expand...

The above is not an opinion. If you believe it is, please post FACT proving me wrong. Your link did not.
 
texasgirl said:
Abortion can't be allowed after 16 weeks of pregnancy.
Click to expand...
Then I suggest birth control or have the procedure before 16 weeks.

See how easy that is
 
texasgirl said:
Abortion can't be allowed after 16 weeks of pregnancy.
Click to expand...

Do you have an actual point? WTF do your videos have to do with what we supposedly can or cannot do? Use your words.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom