ABC Whistleblower accuses ABC and Harris Campaign of collusion (1 Viewer)

[jmotivator]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress

 

[SNOWFLAKE]

Kamala won the debate. Trump has refused a 2nd one. But we need an INVESTIGATION!! Good luck.

 

[Kblaster49]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

LINK?

 

[eman623]

Even without such a document, it's undeniable and obvious to anyone who watched that the entire debate and the moderators were biased towards Harris.

No Republican should ever agree to debate on, or appear on ABC "News" shows again until they clean up their act, or else just openly admit they are not an impartial news organization.

 

[Airyaman]

Oh look, more hoax material. MAGA is so desperate after Trump shit his pants in front of millions.

 

[SkyChief]

The moderators in ABC's Presidential Debate were clearly pulling for Kamala.

They fact-checked Trump numerous times, and (predicably) fact-checked Kamala ZERO times.

This should not be a surprise to anyone.

 

[Callen]

if they knew of this prior to the debate then why on earth didn't they come forward then? Maybe they had to wait to see if he lost......

 

[Minerva]

And whom was this affidavit filed with?

 

[CaughtInThe]

The girl kicked the boy's ass.

MAGA will never get over that.

 

[Brusan]

Yeppers; that affidavit certainly explains why Trump brought up Haitians eating pets and making other "easily" debunked statements. It was all an ABC/Harris conspiracy. LOL.
Strange to say the least, this accusation didn't come forth BEFORE the debate, if originating with a "fairness concerned" ABC employee rather than someone stimulated with a stipend.

 

[post]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

Except they are not lies, outside of the Trump and his cult are victims, alternate universe. The newspaper of record of Charlottesville consists of staff who witnessed what happened that weekend. They wrote in reaction to what Trump claimed is an exoneration by a contributor at Snopes.

The June 28 newspaper article is in my post immediately following this one,

Snopes is a Least Biased Source despite what you may have read

No, my equally valid opinion on your posts and on what Snopes publishes. Does my opinion not hold as much validity as yours? You are entitled to your opinion. Mine just happens to be correct.

debatepolitics.com

 

[jmotivator]

The moderators in ABC's Presidential Debate were clearly pulling for Kamala.

They fact-checked Trump numerous times, and (predicably) fact-checked Kamala ZERO times.

This should not be a surprise to anyone.

It was expected, but if it was an actual under the table agreement then it is corruption.

 

[Mr Person]

The moderators in ABC's Presidential Debate were clearly pulling for Kamala.

They fact-checked Trump numerous times, and (predicably) fact-checked Kamala ZERO times.

This should not be a surprise to anyone.

Trump can't open his mouth without lies spilling out all over the place, so no shit it isn't surprising he got fact checked a lot.

It was expected, but if it was an actual under the table agreement then it is corruption.

It's also no surprise that his Trumpists would cook up the usual batch of lies and conspiracy theories to defend his utter failure at the debate.

It's also no surprise that unlike Biden, Trump won't withdraw from the race over his failures because that's just the kind of selfish lying shitstain he is and is loved by his base for being.

 

[jmotivator]

Yeppers; that affidavit certainly explains why Trump brought up Haitians eating pets and making other "easily" debunked statements. It was all an ABC/Harris conspiracy. LOL.
Strange to say the least, this accusation didn't come forth BEFORE the debate, if originating with a "fairness concerned" ABC employee rather than someone stimulated with a stipend.

This isn't about whether or not Trump's statements were false, it is about what the moderators didn't ask Kamala, and the lies that Kamala was allowed to say without moderator challenge. Everyone knows that "Very Fine People" story was a hoax, as was the "Bloodbath" statement. And the Trump Cat story could end up being true since nobody in the news media has bothered to actually go to Springfield to find out.

If Kamala cheated then Kamala cheated.

 

[Callen]

It was expected, but if it was an actual under the table agreement then it is corruption.

No doubt then this will be filed with the courts and with the FCC in the next day or two....or maybe just with Jim Jordan et al. If it isn't filed officially it's BS

 

[Rexedgar]

How did ABC and Harris make Trump implode?


Wait, she attacked his crowd size at rallies, never mind….

 

[Callen]

This isn't about whether or not Trump's statements were false, it is about what the moderators didn't ask Kamala, and the lies that Kamala was allowed to say without moderator challenge. Everyone knows that "Very Fine People" story was a hoax, as was the "Bloodbath" statement. And the Trump Cat story could end up being true since nobody in the news media has bothered to actually go to Springfield to find out.

The moderators only called him on three of his over 30 lies and only on the most egregious and dangerous. Why didn't Trump call her out if he didn't say and mean what she said?

 

[SkyChief]

It was expected, but if it was an actual under the table agreement then it is corruption.

Agreed.

ABC's decision to only fact-check Trump and NOT fact-check Kamala is outlined in the affidavit. (see affidavit included in the OP).

ABC deliberately withheld their decision from Trump knowing that he would decline to debate Harris under those conditions (as anyone would). ABC is heavily biased, and corrupt as hell. So is CNN, BTW.

 

[BirdinHand]

You guys - HARRIS HAD A SMALLER PODIUM!





Oh…and ABC agreed to live fact checking of a known liar.


There’s absolutely nothing else in this affadavit. Nothing.

 

[Variant]

The moderators in ABC's Presidential Debate were clearly pulling for Kamala.

They fact-checked Trump numerous times, and (predicably) fact-checked Kamala ZERO times.

This should not be a surprise to anyone.

If Kamala had accused some group of people of eating peoples pets I'll bet that they would have stepped in.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

This is a fake.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Agreed.

ABC's decision to only fact-check Trump and NOT fact-check Kamala is outlined in the affidavit. (see affidavit included in the OP).

ABC deliberately withheld their decision from Trump knowing that he would decline to debate Harris under those conditions (as anyone would). ABC is corrupt as hell. So is CNN, BTW.

Evidence?

 

[BirdinHand]

Trump was checked TWICE by moderators.

1. Eating pets
2. Abortions of LIVING babies


Both were flat out agregious lies that should be called out on the spot.


And frankly, who cares that her podium was shorter. Oh no…she’s not 6+ ft tall.

 

[StarvedForChange]

Below is a 6 page Affidavit signed under oath and date stamped the day before the debate.

It is by an ABC News Employee accusing ABC News and the Campaign for Kamala Harris of agreeing to a secret deal before the debate to avoid certain questions, and to not fact check Kamala Harris' statements during the debate.

They claim to have audio recordings of conversations verifying his statements.

This would certainly explain why Harris was able to get away with the "Very Fine People" and "Bloodbath" lies without a challenge from the moderators.

The Whistleblower has offered to testify before congress


View attachment 67532608
View attachment 67532609
View attachment 67532610

 

[ColdHardTruth]

The moderators in ABC's Presidential Debate were clearly pulling for Kamala.

They fact-checked Trump numerous times, and (predicably) fact-checked Kamala ZERO times.

This should not be a surprise to anyone.

Baseless nonsense.