IValueFreedom said:Hmm... I wonder why the link says "link" instead of the URL?
IValueFreedom said:Maybe... I'm just guessing... is because it's from the OpinionJournal from the Wall Street Journal. Hmm... the opinion page of a generally conservative paper. Just seems impossible that something could be written to appease their followers. No, that would just be crazy. The EDITORIAL PIECE must be true!
IValueFreedom said:Hmm... I wonder why the link says "link" instead of the URL?
Maybe... I'm just guessing... is because it's from the OpinionJournal from the Wall Street Journal. Hmm... the opinion page of a generally conservative paper. Just seems impossible that something could be written to appease their followers. No, that would just be crazy. The EDITORIAL PIECE must be true!
hawk2 said:What sort of person would derive a perverse sense of pleasure by denigrating some good news from Iraq?
Do you stick kittens in the microwave for other laughs?
VTA said:It says "link" because that's what it is. Clicking on it to finish the read would certainly unravel the mystery...:roll:
Nice try...
Not really.
As are a multitude of articles posted as absolutes; some chair jockey far away from the action, spouting off on something he's really not in a position to judge. Ironically the one that hints at any kind of optimism is met with... ire?
Really IVF, your quibbling over form instead of the function of the topic is a farce, devoid of any substance relevant to the actual subject.
GarzaUK said:I've heard this all before.
IValueFreedom said:I don't know what "ire" means. I'm guessing it's an abreviation for something, but until I'm updated with what it means, I will wait to comment.
As for quibbling, yeah, you're damned right things like this make me mad. Our administration feeds our domestic media loads of crap and when people like the individual whom wrote this article takes it and runs, then people like you, whom take hold of it, get me frustrated. It's nothing that you did. It's how the media giant of this counry works:\
VTA said:It says "link" because that's what it is. Clicking on it to finish the read would certainly unravel the mystery...:roll:
Nice try...
Not really.
As are a multitude of articles posted as absolutes; some chair jockey far away from the action, spouting off on something he's really not in a position to judge. Ironically the one that hints at any kind of optimism is met with... ire?
Really IVF, your quibbling over form instead of the function of the topic is a farce, devoid of any substance relevant to the actual subject.
VTA said:Evidently, its meaning is lost on you...
Without the elections paving the way for a written constitution, a 50,000-60,000 man army of Iraqi soldiers fighting with American soldiers would not have been possible. Each incidence was/is a turning point. If it's a turning point toward winning the war is yet to be seen, but a turning point is what it is none the less.
IValueFreedom said:it might take some time to gather some of the propoganda from the article, and I'm at work. So it might not be there til tonight, or even in a couple days.
Don't worry, I won't forget about it though
FinnMacCool said:Dude. . . that article is propaganda though.
FinnMacCool said:Omg. . .another idiot that thinks the Daily Show is an actual news channel. . .
Dude. . . that article is propaganda though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?