Lame. Fact is both major parties gerrymander up the ying yang wherever possible at the beginning of the decade, right after the census. No doubt about that. What’s new here, one can say precedence setting is redistricting, gerrymandering in the middle of the decade, mid-census by Texas for purely partisan reasons of attempting to gain 5 additional GOP seats. There’s no doubt Texas following Trump’s orders to redraw their districts are in the wrong. Again, no doubt about that either.
Mid-decade, mid-census gerrymandering, redrawing of district lines don’t happen. Maps drawn right after the census are expected to stand until the new census is taken a decade later. It’s a shame you don’t see the difference between gerrymandering right after the census which is the norm, expected as both major parties do it. This mid-decade, mid-census redrawing, gerrymandering is a first that wasn’t court ordered, a first for purely 100% partisan reasons. There’s very little that’s ethical when it comes to our politics, unethical, immoral applies here to this mid-decade, mid-census redistricting.