- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- Messages
- 12,212
- Reaction score
- 5,719
- Location
- Tampa Bay area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
What views are those?, I find his views more than a bit twisted.
What views are those?
Are you talking just to talk?Two of Dozier's statements immediately come to mind:What views are those?, I find his views more than a bit twisted.
1. He stated he lived by a strict moral code without defining that code.
2. He stated he had a clear conscience.
I believe Dozier shot and killed, then chopped up and discarded one of his victims.
Are you talking just to talk?
How are those (#'s 1&2) twisted?
That doesn't answer the question.Not many people would claim to have a strict moral code that involves killing and dismembering people and having a clear conscience.
So for the majority of people that would be classed as being twisted and deranged.
Are you still going to avoid supporting your claim and clarifying how #'s 1 & 2 are twisted?Are you talking just to talk?Two of Dozier's statements immediately come to mind:What views are those?, I find his views more than a bit twisted.
1. He stated he lived by a strict moral code without defining that code.
2. He stated he had a clear conscience.
I believe Dozier shot and killed, then chopped up and discarded one of his victims.
How are those (#'s 1&2) twisted?
Two of Dozier's statements immediately come to mind:
1. He stated he lived by a strict moral code without defining that code.
2. He stated he had a clear conscience.
I believe Dozier shot and killed, then chopped up and discarded one of his victims.
Do you have an opinion regarding Dozier receiving a Death Penalty?
Regarding #1 above, he did describe his code a bit, in that he claimed he'd never harmed women, children, or law abiding citizens.
Apparently other criminals and police are fair game.
So his code has room for incredible violence against other criminals, and as he pointed also out, criminals can't call the police. They have to enforce their own rules, and going overboard (with mutilations) is a way to avoid having to do it often.
So I can see how he's rationalized his acts as within the rules all participants had agreed to.
He obviously arrived at a conclusion where his life isn't worth continuing and I can't say I blame him.
Bit of a waste, but this is what hard drugs often lead to. Teach your kids better.
IMO, Dozier's ability to reconcile with a clear conscience and a strict moral code what he did to Miller reflected obvious twisted thinking.
I'm not opposed to the term, but twisted is pretty vague, yeah?
He admits he was on meth at the time, and it's known to trigger people to do very strange things.
He appears to have done a lot of self searching, thought through his acts, and yes reconciled a brutal murder.
If you ever watched old samurai movies, you see this sort of thing regularly. Someone is forced to kill themselves, or stand by while someone they love is killed, because of rules of conduct that don't really make sense outside that culture.
I expect this guy feels his victim forced his hand, being another participant in his code of rules where getting ripped off by a criminal associate justifies violent revenge. Having already killed the guy, might as well build the reputation in his criminal under-culture with a bit of dismemberment. It's not like it hurts his victim extra.
Doesn't make him nice or good, it just illustrates that humans can rationalize nearly any behavior you can imagine.
I'm not opposed to the term, but twisted is pretty vague, yeah?
He admits he was on meth at the time, and it's known to trigger people to do very strange things.
He appears to have done a lot of self searching, thought through his acts, and yes reconciled a brutal murder.
If you ever watched old samurai movies, you see this sort of thing regularly. Someone is forced to kill themselves, or stand by while someone they love is killed, because of rules of conduct that don't really make sense outside that culture.
I expect this guy feels his victim forced his hand, being another participant in his code of rules where getting ripped off by a criminal associate justifies violent revenge. Having already killed the guy, might as well build the reputation in his criminal under-culture with a bit of dismemberment. It's not like it hurts his victim extra.
Doesn't make him nice or good, it just illustrates that humans can rationalize nearly any behavior you can imagine.
Wrong as what you say is wrong headed.IMO, Dozier's ability to reconcile with a clear conscience and a strict moral code what he did to Miller reflected obvious twisted thinking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?