Nah. Most elected officials have pretty modest salaries. Even the president only makes $400K per year...which is extremely low.
considering the amount of responsibility with which we give him
If they wanted to make a **** load of money then they should have went into private sector not into public service.
jamesrage said:BTW 400k is a ****load of money to most people.
jamesrage said:Their job is to serve the people,if they do not do it right then we their bosses should deny them raises and give them pay cuts if necessary.
I would actually argue that politicians salaries should be increased. The amount of money their salaries require is minimal compared to the money that they are responsible for. I'd view paying politician as an investment to avoid future expenses. Upfront costs are higher, but you would probably get it all back and more from having less lobbyist influence on the political process as a whole. Paying 100k more in salary now would probably be cheaper than paying 1 million in pork later.
Nah. Most elected officials have pretty modest salaries. Even the president only makes $400K per year...which is extremely low, considering the amount of responsibility with which we give him.
Even in Detroit ?When you spend a billion dollars to get a job that pays $400,000 it's really not about money, is it? Presidents think it is their patriotic duty because they are the best person for the job.
I'll give the city council and the mayor a raise.
Nah. Most elected officials have pretty modest salaries. Even the president only makes $400K per year...which is extremely low, considering the amount of responsibility with which we give him.
While I can see a good logical basis for this it's my opinion that most of these people would cheat the system no matter what. To play a little semantics game here, just for fun what I bolded could be considered extortion under the right circumstances, "if we got paid better we wouldn't abuse the lobby system" could easily fit right in there with a bunch of gang members walking into a store and saying "nice place, for the right price we can make sure it stays that way."I would actually argue that politicians salaries should be increased. The amount of money their salaries require is minimal compared to the money that they are responsible for. I'd view paying politician as an investment to avoid future expenses. Upfront costs are higher, but you would probably get it all back and more from having less lobbyist influence on the political process as a whole. Paying 100k more in salary now would probably be cheaper than paying 1 million in pork later.
Yeah, but what are the President's actual personal expenses whilst in Office?
We all know they make mad bank as soon as they are out of office.
Does this even matter?
....We're talking about the guy running the United States of America.
I'm pretty sure 400K doesn't even begin to cover the type of responsibility the POTUS has.
Sorry I should have said only for Republicans and corporate CEOs. No bonuses from US tax dollars.Only for Republicans.
How many here would favor a 10% pay cut for all federal and state elected officials? There would be no raise for four years. I don't know how to get this in to a poll but it just rubs me wrong looking and hearing our self-serving, lying officals sound off as if they give a crap about the citizens of America as we go through this eononmic crisis. Why hasn't a single politician offered up a cut in their pay instead of everyone elses? Think how much that would be over a period of four years and what could be done with the money.
Nah. Most elected officials have pretty modest salaries. Even the president only makes $400K per year...which is extremely low, considering the amount of responsibility with which we give him.
I'm more interested in term limits.
400k a year is hardly LOW. Plus he gets free room and board in a mansion for him and his family. Free food, free drinks, parties, dinners, free travel expenses to anywhere in the world. It's hardly piddly. It's far, FAR too high, IMO.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?