Yeah, I ain't holdin' my breath.Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
Mike Pence is not a hero, he just failed to be the villain they wanted him to be.Mike Pence.
Besides the fact that the Republican rank and file have very low opinions of Romney and Pence right now...making the split unlikely to happen...if they succeeded, they would be ensuring the Globalists keep control and the American people keep suffering.Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
No one said he is.Mike Pence is not a hero, he just failed to be the villain they wanted him to be.
That's what keepin' things legal will do. Law and Order Party my...Besides the fact that the Republican rank and file have very low opinions of Romney and Pence right now...making the split unlikely to happen...if they succeeded, they would be ensuring the Globalists keep control and the American people keep suffering.
Doesn't sound very "patriotic" to me.
Interesting - but I still don't think Trump will run in 2024.A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
Well said.Mike Pence is not a hero, he just failed to be the villain they wanted him to be.
Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
That would be worth watching for sure, but I don't think trump will run, he just wants to grift a few more bucks before he makes that announcement.Pence wouldn't get that many votes. Romney maybe, but certainly not Pence.
I really, really want to see DeSantis and Trump go after each other though.
He can grift even more if he runs. Then people will be spending money at his crappy properties. He can have his tent revivals (rallies) and shaft venues when the bills come. He can bow out sometime during the race, to focus on his "family business".That would be worth watching for sure, but I don't think trump will run, he just wants to grift a few more bucks before he makes that announcement.
It didn’t make much sense to me either but yes that is the just of the OP. That Is one reason their posts are so painfully ignorant but entertainingSo you think that the Republicans should run a former 2 term president to split the gop vote to put a racist democrat in the White House
You mean, like Bernie Sanders did in 2016...handing the POTUS to Trump by splitting the democratic side of the aisle in the general?Over a century ago, Teddy Roosevelt kept his pledge to leave the presidency after two terms. His hand-picked successor, Taft, won the next election.
But Roosevelt had a falling out with Taft, and decided he should not continue in office. So, he ran the following election, against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson, splitting the Republican vote, giving Democrats their first win in 16 years.
A lot of Republicans don't like the radicalization of the party, but don't want to vote for Democrats. I disagree with them, but it's the case.
What we could use is a good Republican who, like Roosevelt, decides that that party is not fit to govern currently, especially if trump is nominated, and runs a third party candidacy to split the Republican vote, giving disaffected Republicans someone to vote for, and prevent a Republican win. It would be patriotic and help the country.
A couple leading people who fit this are Mitt Romney or Mike Pence.
?? Assumes facts not in evidence. This doesn't even qualify as feeble revisionist history. He did no such thing. Not only did Bernie drop out, he actually told his staunch supporters that they must vote for Clinton to keep Trump from the White House! It's all a matter of public record.You mean, like Bernie Sanders did in 2016...handing the POTUS to Trump by splitting the democratic side of the aisle in the general?
Yeah....you'd know all about that being a big Bernie person.
?? Assumes facts not in evidence. This doesn't even qualify as feeble revisionist history. He did no such thing. Not only did Bernie drop out, he actually told his staunch supporters that they must vote for Clinton to keep Trump from the White House! It's all a matter of public record.
SO WHAT? When did Bernie become responsible for the actions of his supporters? You're intent on blaming him for something he had absolutely nothing to do with, and no power whatsoever to change.Bernie Sanders Voters Helped Trump Become President
Bernie Sanders supporters didn't just stay at home, they voted for Donald Trump in significant numbers last November.www.newsweek.com
Primaries have nothing to do with it, I said running third party in the general. Even pulling away 10% would be huge to help Democrats win. The last two elections were decided by under 100,000 votes.Republicans like Mike Pence or Mitt Romney have such a tiny sliver of support in the republican party today that it would not even make a dent in the primaries.
When Bernie dropped out, he threw all of his support behind Hillary Clinton's candidacy, and made that perfectly clear in his public pronouncements. If you want to blame Bernie's voting bloc, you could make the very same argument of anyone who voted for any candidate that wasn't Trump or Clinton. It's like blaming Ralph Nader for Bush the Lesser winning over Al Gore. It's an intellectually dishonest position to take once all the facts are known.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?