A new court filing inadvertently revealed that federal prosecutors have 'historical and prospective cell site information' related to Rudy Giuliani

[Plasmaball]

A new court filing inadvertently revealed that federal prosecutors have 'historical and prospective cell site information' related to Rudy Giuliani

In an improperly redacted letter to a judge, Lev Parnas' lawyer said the feds seized multiple accounts and devices connected to the Giuliani probe.

www.businessinsider.com

And thus why democrats were correct in impeaching trump over Ukraine. There was no perfect phone call. Odds are info will come out about trying to kill the woman.
Ole Rudy is in trouble. Although I have a feeling this wasn't an accident

 

[tres borrachos]

A new court filing inadvertently revealed that federal prosecutors have 'historical and prospective cell site information' related to Rudy Giuliani

In an improperly redacted letter to a judge, Lev Parnas' lawyer said the feds seized multiple accounts and devices connected to the Giuliani probe.

www.businessinsider.com

And thus why democrats were correct in impeaching trump over Ukraine. There was no perfect phone call. Odds are info will come out about trying to kill the woman.
Ole Rudy is in trouble. Although I have a feeling this wasn't an accident

****ing Rudy. He's a caricature of the man he once was. Now he's nothing but a corrupt moron who carries Trump's water and embarrasses himself in public by farting and having his head drool hair dye.

 

[Rogue Valley]

From what I understand, the Feds seized 18 electronic devices from Giuliani property.

 

[joko104]

As I often point out, the Democratic Party has fully eliminated attorney-client privilege, rule of law and due process, replaced with a federal Gestapo.

Nothing in the article from some blog indicated nothing illegal he did. Rather, it all is to make it clear that anyone law firm that represents politicians or activists who are considered enemies of the state will be destroyed, whether guilty of anything or not. With the government exposing anything and everything his law firm did or does, everyone knows that under no circumstance hire his law firm. As long as kelptocrats and Democrats hold power, no law firm ever dare represent any Republican or anyone else who is an adversary of the International Corporate-Fascist state.

 

[NuffSaid]

Poor Rudy. Went from America's Mayor to a shoe-polish dripping servant to Trump.

 

[NuffSaid]

With the government exposing anything and everything his law firm did or does, everyone knows that under no circumstance hire his law firm.

No, no one wants to hire him probably because of this:

 

[BlueTex]

As I often point out, the Democratic Party has fully eliminated attorney-client privilege, rule of law and due process, replaced with a federal Gestapo.

Nothing in the article from some blog indicated nothing illegal he did. Rather, it all is to make it clear that anyone law firm that represents politicians or activists who are considered enemies of the state will be destroyed, whether guilty of anything or not. With the government exposing anything and everything his law firm did or does, everyone knows that under no circumstance hire his law firm. As long as kelptocrats and Democrats hold power, no law firm ever dare represent any Republican or anyone else who is an adversary of the International Corporate-Fascist state.

There has never been attorney-client privilege for criminal acts....

 

[joko104]

There has never been attorney-client privilege for criminal acts....

If attorney's entire files for all clients can be seized searching for crime, there is no attorney client privilege at all. If this is done selectively on political decisions it is the Gestapo. The only thing would make it legitimate is all attorneys were required to provide the government with all their files, all their emails and recordings of all telephone calls and notes.

 

[iguanaman]

As I often point out, the Democratic Party has fully eliminated attorney-client privilege, rule of law and due process, replaced with a federal Gestapo.

Nothing in the article from some blog indicated nothing illegal he did. Rather, it all is to make it clear that anyone law firm that represents politicians or activists who are considered enemies of the state will be destroyed, whether guilty of anything or not. With the government exposing anything and everything his law firm did or does, everyone knows that under no circumstance hire his law firm. As long as kelptocrats and Democrats hold power, no law firm ever dare represent any Republican or anyone else who is an adversary of the International Corporate-Fascist state.

There is no attorney client privilege when laws are broken. The rule of law will always come first in America much to your idols chagrin. There will be no loopholes to jump through anymore.

 

[BlueTex]

If attorney's entire files for all clients can be seized searching for crime, there is no attorney client privilege at all. If this is done selectively on political decisions it is the Gestapo. The only thing would make it legitimate is all attorneys were required to provide the government with all their files, all their emails and recordings of all telephone calls and notes.

Never heard of a special master before?

 

[reflechissez]

As I often point out, the Democratic Party has fully eliminated attorney-client privilege, rule of law and due process, replaced with a federal Gestapo.

Nothing in the article from some blog indicated nothing illegal he did. Rather, it all is to make it clear that anyone law firm that represents politicians or activists who are considered enemies of the state will be destroyed, whether guilty of anything or not. With the government exposing anything and everything his law firm did or does, everyone knows that under no circumstance hire his law firm. As long as kelptocrats and Democrats hold power, no law firm ever dare represent any Republican or anyone else who is an adversary of the International Corporate-Fascist state.

You "often point out" lots of things that are wrong. This is no different.

 

[iguanaman]

If attorney's entire files for all clients can be seized searching for crime, there is no attorney client privilege at all. If this is done selectively on political decisions it is the Gestapo. The only thing would make it legitimate is all attorneys were required to provide the government with all their files, all their emails and recordings of all telephone calls and notes.

Sorry but we have ways of protecting the privilege as long as laws are not broken. There will be no loopholes to protect the guilty. That is unamerican. Truth, Justice and the American way will always prevail.

 

[Plasmaball]

If attorney's entire files for all clients can be seized searching for crime, there is no attorney client privilege at all. If this is done selectively on political decisions it is the Gestapo. The only thing would make it legitimate is all attorneys were required to provide the government with all their files, all their emails and recordings of all telephone calls and notes.

No

 

[Slartibartfast]

If attorney's entire files for all clients can be seized searching for crime, there is no attorney client privilege at all. If this is done selectively on political decisions it is the Gestapo. The only thing would make it legitimate is all attorneys were required to provide the government with all their files, all their emails and recordings of all telephone calls and notes.

Crime-Fraud Exception​

The attorney-client privilege is something that belongs to the client, not the attorney. Therefore, it is the client’s intent when speaking to his or her attorney that can determine whether the crime-fraud exception (or other limits to the rule) exists. The crime-fraud exception holds that if the client intended to commit or was in the middle of committing a crime or act of fraud and communicated this intent to the lawyer, the information is not under privilege. In other words, if a lawyer learns that his/her client intends to commit a crime or cover up a crime, the lawyer has the right to disclose this information to authorities.


The prosecution can subpoena the lawyer and force him or her to disclose this information. In standard situations, an attorney does not have to disclose privileged client information even if under oath to tell the whole truth. Future crimes and fraud a lawyer will have the right to disclose can include destroying evidence, tampering with a witness, concealing income, threats to someone, and perjury. This exception can extend past crimes and into civil torts, or wrongs, as well. Most intentional civil wrongs are crimes anyway, such as trespassing and assault.


A client who has yet to commit a civil or criminal wrongdoing cannot disclose this information to a lawyer and expect the attorney-client privilege to keep the lawyer silent. Most states will permit an attorney to break a confidentiality agreement if someone is in danger. If the information has to do with a past crime, it is most likely privileged. The same is true if the client is merely speculating about a possible future intent. It can be difficult, however, for a lawyer to distinguish between musings over a future crime and actual intent.

 

[TomFitz]

A new court filing inadvertently revealed that federal prosecutors have 'historical and prospective cell site information' related to Rudy Giuliani

In an improperly redacted letter to a judge, Lev Parnas' lawyer said the feds seized multiple accounts and devices connected to the Giuliani probe.

www.businessinsider.com

And thus why democrats were correct in impeaching trump over Ukraine. There was no perfect phone call. Odds are info will come out about trying to kill the woman.
Ole Rudy is in trouble. Although I have a feeling this wasn't an accident

Recall that the real transcript of that “perfect phone call” is hidden away somewhere in a classified bin,

What passes for a “transcript” of a “perfect phone call” is nothing more than what the White House made up, and an indication of how much they thought they could reveal without spilling the whole racket.

 

[Plasmaball]

Recall that the real transcript of that “perfect phone call” is hidden away somewhere in a classified bin,

What passes for a “transcript” of a “perfect phone call” is nothing more than what the White House made up, and an indication of how much they thought they could reveal without spilling the whole racket.

They tried to Billy barr the transcript