- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Calling this study "junk science" is a lie and you made it up. You've shown no evidence to dispute the study other than you calling it junk science. This is how you operate. You make it up, you never prove what you make up, you attack anyone who challenges the made up **** that you post and you whine, whine, whine...but you never disprove the truth that you dispute, you just divert away from the truth and continue to post bs like calling the Mass General study "junk science."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html?em
Very interesting. Thoughts?
(Before people post something about how smoking is evil and should be a crime or how this is fascism seeking to take away your constitutional right to smoke a boge in your own house, take a second to realize that this isn't a political issue, it's a scientific one).
But the food you put into your body doesn't have a direct physical effect on those around you, beans and broccoli aside.
I read the story. you fail again.
I find a blurb, and some dubious nonsense about some study suspect to say the least.
Tell me what are the known "safe levels" of ETS?
And also if you do a little more research on this junk science, they also state that breast feeding is still better than bottle feeding.... given thier "logic" one would assume that breast milk from a smoker poses some risks, or is it only microparticles on the couch?
Junk science for the lunatic fringe to glom onto...... :2wave:
You know what's still the number one killer out there?
Death
Hmmmm, interesting. I wonder how experts would categorize dust mites.http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html?em
Very interesting. Thoughts?
(Before people post something about how smoking is evil and should be a crime or how this is fascism seeking to take away your constitutional right to smoke a boge in your own house, take a second to realize that this isn't a political issue, it's a scientific one).
Hmmmm, interesting. I wonder how experts would categorize dust mites.
And not a hazard like "Third Hand Smoke"?They would probably categorize them as Arachnids.
And not a hazard like "Third Hand Smoke"?
I never thought you would miss my point.Dust mite experts don't know **** about smoke.
I never thought you would miss my point.
Being a poo?
In a recently published, double-blind study at the Crippler Institute for Goofy Studies(CIGS), psuedo-scientists have discovered an even more dangerous hazard stemming from cigarette smoking.
Fourth Hand Smoke
Being beat to the punch of trying to uncover third hand smoke, CIGS non-researchers immediatley set out to find the next "dimension" of harm caused by cigarette smoke. What they found was startling.
Fourth Hand Smoke can best be defined as the mental anguish and stress suffered by anti-smokers, when they think about how much they hate smoking and all its ill effects. The symptoms included severe anger and disdain towards smokers, resulting in higher blood pressure, and also a desire to infringe upon the rights of individuals and private establishments. Some of them even masturbate to the "truth" commercials, although those are rare and extreme cases.
So smokers, next time you light one up, remember not only are you damaging your lungs, the lungs of people around you, and making furniture stink. You are also causing the anti-smoking people to have terrible headaches and periods of extreme personal judgment whenever they think you might be smoking.
An interesting article, I just published.....
My god... My cigarette is causing this much damage to society!?! I'd better quit!... or not.
By the way, do the anti-smokers get lighter headaches if I smoke ultra-lights? If so do they need pain-killers any time someone lights up a Palmal unfiltered?
An interesting article, I just published.....
My MIL used to chain smoke everytime she came to visit(she finally stopped at the request of my hubby, she now goes outside to smoke)and when we went to visit her. I always dreaded seeing her, b/c I'd get bad lingering headaches, and my eyes would water. Some ppl can smoke, and you can barely smell anything on them or their house, but some ppl wreak of it 24/7, along with their car and their house.
As for their study, I wish they would have alloted that money used towards finding a cure for certain cancers.
Interesting and informative. I wonder what we can do about it.http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html?em
Very interesting. Thoughts?
(Before people post something about how smoking is evil and should be a crime or how this is fascism seeking to take away your constitutional right to smoke a boge in your own house, take a second to realize that this isn't a political issue, it's a scientific one).
Interesting and informative. I wonder what we can do about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?