- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 36,235
- Reaction score
- 8,380
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: A Historic Number of Electors Defected, and Most Were Supposed to Vote for Clinto
Bwahahahahahhahahaha! You mean this parroting of no evidence?
I'd say my post here...
Still got no evidence? LMAO! Not even one shred? Here is why...
There’s a lot of evidence from the attack on the table, mostly detailing how the hack was perpetrated, and possibly the language of the perpetrators. It certainly remains plausible that Russians hacked the DNC, and remains possible that Russia itself ordered it. But the refrain of Russian attribution has been repeated so regularly and so emphatically that it’s become easy to forget that no one has ever truly proven the claim. There is strong evidence indicating that Democratic email accounts were breached via phishing messages, and that specific malware was spread across DNC computers. There’s even evidence that the attackers are the same group that’s been spotted attacking other targets in the past. But again: No one has actually proven that group is the Russian government (or works for it). This remains the enormous inductive leap that’s not been reckoned with, and Americans deserve better. - https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/
Mr. King, a New York Republican who sits on the House intelligence committee, said the intelligence community has not been presented with any evidence to support the claim. - Peter King: CIA doing 'hit job' against Donald Trump; 'no evidence' Russia behind Podesta hack - Washington Times
The revelations that Russia actively sought to influence the American election and help Donald Trump become the next president are shocking, mind-blowing and downright scary. But here is something they are not: evidence that the Russians hacked voting machines or changed the Election Day count. Unsubstantiated assertions that Russia actually manipulated the vote tally are themselves dangerous. - Russia's role is shocking but there's no evidence the vote was hacked - CNN.com
Only a few days ago the New York Times acknowledged that the CIA finding that the Kremlin hacked the Democratic National Convention’s computers with the intention of influencing the US presidential election was based, not on evidence, but conjecture. Today, the newspaper’s reporters have forgotten their earlier caveats and have begun to treat the intelligence agency’s guess-work as an established truth. - How an Evidence-Free CIA Finding Alleging Russian Interference in the US Election was Turned into an Indisputable ?Truth? | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
Now do you have evidence that no one else has? Or are you going to continue the run in the hamster wheel, lol.
Directly refutes your cop out sentence. :lamo
Bwahahahahahhahahaha! You mean this parroting of no evidence?
I'd say my post here...
Still got no evidence? LMAO! Not even one shred? Here is why...
There’s a lot of evidence from the attack on the table, mostly detailing how the hack was perpetrated, and possibly the language of the perpetrators. It certainly remains plausible that Russians hacked the DNC, and remains possible that Russia itself ordered it. But the refrain of Russian attribution has been repeated so regularly and so emphatically that it’s become easy to forget that no one has ever truly proven the claim. There is strong evidence indicating that Democratic email accounts were breached via phishing messages, and that specific malware was spread across DNC computers. There’s even evidence that the attackers are the same group that’s been spotted attacking other targets in the past. But again: No one has actually proven that group is the Russian government (or works for it). This remains the enormous inductive leap that’s not been reckoned with, and Americans deserve better. - https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/
Mr. King, a New York Republican who sits on the House intelligence committee, said the intelligence community has not been presented with any evidence to support the claim. - Peter King: CIA doing 'hit job' against Donald Trump; 'no evidence' Russia behind Podesta hack - Washington Times
The revelations that Russia actively sought to influence the American election and help Donald Trump become the next president are shocking, mind-blowing and downright scary. But here is something they are not: evidence that the Russians hacked voting machines or changed the Election Day count. Unsubstantiated assertions that Russia actually manipulated the vote tally are themselves dangerous. - Russia's role is shocking but there's no evidence the vote was hacked - CNN.com
Only a few days ago the New York Times acknowledged that the CIA finding that the Kremlin hacked the Democratic National Convention’s computers with the intention of influencing the US presidential election was based, not on evidence, but conjecture. Today, the newspaper’s reporters have forgotten their earlier caveats and have begun to treat the intelligence agency’s guess-work as an established truth. - How an Evidence-Free CIA Finding Alleging Russian Interference in the US Election was Turned into an Indisputable ?Truth? | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
Now do you have evidence that no one else has? Or are you going to continue the run in the hamster wheel, lol.
Directly refutes your cop out sentence. :lamo
