CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 108,754
- Reaction score
- 108,649
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
yeah, a judge who reviewed all the evidence and made a ruling (with, you know, words) is definitely a CT.Please move to conspiracy theories forum.
Some of you guys sure have low opinions of America.Please move to conspiracy theories forum.
we have way more "anti" americans than even i thought.Some of you guys sure have low opinions of America.
we have way more "anti" americans than even i thought.
How is a judges legal ruling a conspiracy theory?
yes, as they bum rushed our capital and tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power that wasn't an attempted insurrection or anything.I would agree.
And the way they promote division by calling riots insurrections is so obvious.
yes, as they bum rushed our capital and tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power that wasn't an attempted insurrection or anything.
How is a judge's ruling a conspiracy theory?Please move to conspiracy theories forum.
How is a judge's ruling a conspiracy theory?
i think his feelings are hurt.How is a judge's ruling a conspiracy theory?
That's entirely up to the Biden WH. He has not yet blocked any documents related to the Jan. 6th insurrection."Most likely..." means jack****.
"The big question, of course, is whether any of this means that Trump, Eastman and others will be on the receiving end of federal criminal indictments. Maybe, but not certainly." means that Trump hasn't been held to anything, yet, but handing over emails that may take quite a while and may, possibly, just guessing, not include all of them. Exec priv or whatever. A number of lines blacked out. Just like the 1/6 phone recordings are missing the 7 most critical hrs of the insurrection. If, and the big when that has been working for Trump, those recordings are handed over, how much will be "blacked out"?
Once again, for the 10,000th time, what we had at the capitol was a violent uprising against our federal seat of government. I challenge you to find me one definition of 'Insurrection' that does not contain that description, among others.I would agree.
And the way they promote division by calling riots insurrections is so obvious.
Once again, for the 10,000th time, what we had at the capitol was a violent uprising against our federal seat of government. I challenge you to find me one definition of 'Insurrection' that does not contain that description, among others.
Please move to conspiracy theories forum.
I would agree.
And the way they promote division by calling riots insurrections is so obvious.
yes, as they bum rushed our capital and tried to stop the peaceful transfer of power that wasn't an attempted insurrection or anything.
I agree 100%, it only needed to be true once, which it most definitely was, right from the start.Yes, and the 10,001th time won't make it any more true.
I agree 100%, it only needed to be true once, which it most definitely was, right from the start.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?