- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,813
- Reaction score
- 2,233
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
No. I am not going to follow you down that rat hole.Before I do that, why don't you show me how Chomsky is truly a "kook" rather than a name you are calling him simply because his opinion differs from that of your own and he supports that "commie-liberal-pinko-'ism'!"
No. I am not going to follow you down that rat hole.
If you are contending that free market capitalism, as implemented in India in the post WWII era resulted in 100 million excess deaths, you owe us a better explanation than some kook you read in college said so. Noam was a linguist, wasn't he, in the beginning? Very smart guy too. But now he is a socialist. He went off the deep end.[/U
He has been a kook for at least 30 years. Other kooks love him. I can only speculate on why that is.Again, so because his opinion differs from yours, he is a "kook?" Wow.
Of course. How can you doubt that the anti-American, Anti-capitalism president is Marxist? How could you tell the difference between what Marxists have wanted to do to destroy the United States versus what the one term Marxist president Obama has done and is doing?
Is he defacto Marxist, or dejure?
He has been a kook for at least 30 years. Other kooks love him. I can only speculate on why that is.
If you are contending that free market capitalism, as implemented in India in the post WWII era resulted in 100 million excess deaths, you owe us a better explanation than some kook you read in college said so. So show me your explanation please. One hundred million excess deaths...
You still have yet to even mention why he is a "kook" other than "he is a kook and has been."
Does it matter to your argument that I think he is a kook?
Other than quoting him can you show me one hundred million excess deaths in India do to free market capitalism? Show me the two to three million excess deaths in India due to India's policies. Then it won't matter whether or not I think your kook is a kook or not.
Again, so because his opinion differs from yours, he is a "kook?" Wow.
Your kook is, well, your kook.Well, yes. You dispute the source and don't care to acknowledge it while providing zero evidence that the article, is in fact, incorrect. You simply stick your fingers in your ears and hum.
I read your referenced article. Yawn. It was a thinly disguised calling for socialism in health care. I saw no evidence for one hundred million excess deaths resulting from free market capitalism. I saw no evidence of any excess deaths from government policies supporting free market capitalism.Quality of Life: India vs. China by Amartya Sen | The New York Review of Books
Go look at UNICEF, the UN, and various other World Organizations.
Your kook is, well, your kook.
I read your referenced article. Yawn. It was a thinly disguised calling for socialism in health care. I saw no evidence for one hundred million excess deaths resulting from free market capitalism. I saw no evidence of any excess deaths from government policies supporting free market capitalism.
I am not going to waste my time looking at data from organizations with UN or World in the title. They cannot be trusted.
It is clear to me that you and ngnms or whatever (s)he calls him/herself cannot back up the claim that between 1947 and 1979 the implementation of free market capitalism resulted in one hundred million excess deaths. It is preposterous and both of you are foolish to believe it.You still have yet to even mention why he is a "kook" other than "he is a kook and has been."
It is clear to me that you and ngnms or whatever (s)he calls him/herself cannot back up the claim that between 1947 and 1979 the implementation of free market capitalism resulted in one hundred million excess deaths. It is preposterous and both of you are foolish to believe it.
Feel free to take up the challenge. Show me evidence that the kook and his two followers have it right. Show me that between 1947 and 1979 the Indian government's implementation of free market capitalism lead to 100 million excess deaths in India. Or, if you prefer, you can just add yourself to the list of the foolish and gullible.Some people will continue to deny that facts which have already been posted do not exist. That's what happens when all you have are opinions
No facts, no logic, no reason. Just opinion, repeated over and over
Feel free to take up the challenge. Show me evidence that the kook and his two followers have it right. Show me that between 1947 and 1979 the Indian government's implementation of free market capitalism lead to 100 million excess deaths in India. Or, if you prefer, you can just add yourself to the list of the foolish and gullible.
Just for fun I tried to find evidence. That is only three plus million excess deaths per year. With a population today of 1.2 billion people it is going to be tough to do. And that is why a kook can claim it and two, or possibly three, fools can believe it. Surely you can find evidence of one-half of a holocaust per year. Can't you? Today's death rate is 6.4/1000. What was it in 1947? What was it in 1979?
Three fools following one kook. Understood.Why would post the facts that have already been posted and ignored by you when I prefer rightwingers who demonstrate willing ignorance?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?