So? Who are you to me?
Do you have anything to say about the subject or are you just going to attack me for daring to speak about it?
You do understand every child as a father right?
Point? Any?
Men are not creepy they are the parents.
Right-wing nazi fascists view women as property rather than people.
That is what I said basically.
Wow! Just ****in wow.
So it was this creepy comment?
Poor would be your comprehnsion of them.
For someone who wants to touch on biology, you don't know the umbilical physically connects a fetus to its hosts and transports said hosts bodily resources?
And you're wrong!
Strawman argument. Not mine. It doesn't change the facts!
Your denial of legal fact is your problem, not mine.
Strawman again. I cited legal fact and you have nothing to refute that. All you're doing at this point is flailing away with "nuh-uh" style replies.
Comprehension of them are complicated you think they are or is personal attack all you have left
What do you think I don't know that?
No I'm right.
I'm not changing any facts. I don't think the law is a good metric for which are you this because it's veried
I'm not denial of any laws I just don't think they reflect truth. Have you noticed that your argument has turned from arguing for your position to attacking me?
Who cares? Legal fact it doesn't carry outside of the law and I was never talking about law until you brought it up because you were failing on biology.
If it's too complicated for you, then I cannot help you with that.
Given your statements, apparently not.
Only in your mind.
Personhood is a legal matter. The law is what applies. What is your alternative then and why should it be used?
Who said anything about "truth?" I provided established legal fact. I'm not attacking you, I am telling you. If you're feelng attacked, then that only reflects the weakness of your argumets or position.
The law is what this particular issue is based around.
You're attacking my character because you failed to make you coherent argument.
The law is varied and inconsistent.
Still wrong.
The Constitution and federal law is not! And you still haven't offered anything to refute the law nor alternative to it.
It's fact until you provide something valid to demonstrate otherwise.
What about them? They do not establish personhood for the unborn.
That's not how facts work. You have to prove it true I simply doubt it.
So?
You're the one acting wounded here and making a spectacle of yourself in the process. You're also the one accusing me of making personal attcks, so the burden of proof is on you!
Wow, you still don't get it I see.
You're the one projecting this act onto me.
Well when you failed to defend your position you make a comment about me not being able to comprehend your failed defense it's not that I don't comprehend it it's that you failed.
To prove what exactly?
Yeah I don't know how what the law says equals absolute truth do you worship the law? I think the law can be wrong.
Not even a little.
I did show it as fact.
No, you simply didn't comprehend. You askes the same questions even though I already explained, mutiple times. That clearly indicates a lack of compehension on your part.
That I attacked you as you claimed!
"Truth" is just another strawman on your part. It's clear you either do not understand the law or cannot explain it. Much less make a case based around it. Neither have you yet offered any alternative. Just your own feelings. Let me know when you have something rational to offer. The incessant whining on your part is neither an argument or discussion.
I would know my thoughts and feelings better than you
Showed what to be fact
This isn't an argument. It's an excuse
When you tell me that I'm having feelings or that I can't comprehend that's a statement about my person. Means I'm right and you're becoming emotional.
I didn't misrepresent anything you said.
The ball isn't absolute fact to me sometimes it's wrong.
I wasn't making a legalistic argument.
Opinion but yeah.
Show that my opinion is irrational.
I'm not whining pointing out your fellas I'm pointing out that you're not arguing. Is that you're not addressing anything you're freaking out because the law says what it says and somehow you think that should vindicate your idiotic position but you can't explain why.
Feelings seems to be all you have to go on.
Go review my posts. I'm not going to keep repeating myself.
You're the one trying to make excuses here.
Quite the opposite.
I didn't mention anything about truth. That was you.
You have provided no rational explanation as to why it's wrong.
You haven't been making any argument.
You're only affirming what I said.
I said, "Neither have you yet offered any alternative. Just your own feelings."
Referencing the law in a legal issue is supporting an argument. And you still failed to comprehend it. Otherwise you would know I already explained it too.
