• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

911: Planes Hijacked? Crashed into buildings? So where is the evidence?

Thanks for proving my point so soon after I made it... I simply don't have the time to counter all the compressed nonsense you put, and you wouldn't understand either way.

Gave me a good laugh though.

Bman,

You are incapable of talking over Mark's head.

I doubt you have the knowledge to do so in regards to just about any facet related to 9/11.

BTW -

Where have I been wrong about EXPLOSIVES?

Where have I been wrong about AIRCRAFT?

Where have I been wrong about RADAR?
 
Thanks for proving my point so soon after I made it... I simply don't have the time to counter all the compressed nonsense you put, and you wouldn't understand either way.

Gave me a good laugh though.

Translated: You can't. Thank you for proving my point. When you are losing you start in with the insults, diversions and derails. Only one of us stayed on topic and clearly laid out a specific claim - and it wasn't you.

Remember that.
 
Bman,

You are incapable of talking over Mark's head.

I doubt you have the knowledge to do so in regards to just about any facet related to 9/11.

BTW -

Where have I been wrong about EXPLOSIVES?

Where have I been wrong about AIRCRAFT?

Where have I been wrong about RADAR?

what a jokester!

Mark is the one who made the mistake of taking oz seriously and tried to convince us that the paint could stand without the structure on wtc7


Where have I been wrong about EXPLOSIVES?
everywhere and its been proven time and time again despite feeding your auto replay on steroids
Where have I been wrong about AIRCRAFT?
everywhere and its been proven time and time again despite feeding your auto replay on steroids

Where have I been wrong about RADAR?
everywhere and its been proven time and time again despite feeding your auto replay on steroids



I have stated in many posts that bman has the patience of a saint to put up with the autoreplay of the debunkers and official story huggers the way he was.
 
Translated: You can't. Thank you for proving my point. When you are losing you start in with the insults, diversions and derails. Only one of us stayed on topic and clearly laid out a specific claim - and it wasn't you.

Remember that.

truthers rarely have socks to do that for them like the OSH's. lol

Oh and btw mark your above claim/presumption is another logical fallacy but I am not surprised Mr reason himself is not here to correct it.
 
Every time you open your mouth about them.

I have never opened my mouth in this media, you are obviously confused. Besides you forgot to change your socks.

So tell me the exploding transformer story again! I love that one.
 
You mean like this ?
Transformer explosion: Transformer explosion - YouTube

Oh and was there even a transformer in the location required to produce the explosion (year does not look like what was witnessed)...

Grasping at straws still.

Transformers explode. If you tried, you could find EXPLOSIONS.

Still touting EXPLOSIONS as EXPLOSIVES?

Weren't you prattling about THERMITE?

You know... The NON-EXPLOSIVE stuff?
 
Transformers explode. If you tried, you could find EXPLOSIONS.

Still touting EXPLOSIONS as EXPLOSIVES?

Weren't you prattling about THERMITE?

You know... The NON-EXPLOSIVE stuff?

The electrical transformer in my back yard blew up last summer. It was quite loud.
 
I suspect Bman had to sift through a few YouTubes to avoid the noisy transformer explosions.

Studiously avoiding this kind of thing

"On February 12, an underground electrical transformer exploded in front of a Radio Shack on 6th Avenue, in New York City, emitting a fireball seven stories high and damaging nearby buildings. Here's how this could have happened."
How Transformers Can Explode - Popular Mechanics
 
Studiously avoiding this kind of thing

"On February 12, an underground electrical transformer exploded in front of a Radio Shack on 6th Avenue, in New York City, emitting a fireball seven stories high and damaging nearby buildings. Here's how this could have happened."
How Transformers Can Explode - Popular Mechanics

The one in my back yard was not quite that spectacular.
 
The one in my back yard was not quite that spectacular.

Ah, but there was no thermite planted unobserved by secret government agents. The Radio Shack explosion was a trial run.
 
Ah, but there was no thermite planted unobserved by secret government agents. The Radio Shack explosion was a trial run.

You don't know that for sure.
 
Studiously avoiding this kind of thing

"On February 12, an underground electrical transformer exploded in front of a Radio Shack on 6th Avenue, in New York City, emitting a fireball seven stories high and damaging nearby buildings. Here's how this could have happened."
How Transformers Can Explode - Popular Mechanics

but I didnt hear a thing!

All I see is a light!

nothing at all let alone 25kfps explosion
 
To post 759 to 767:

It's clear you all just heard that transformers can explode, I showed the explosion of a transformer that would be larger than any individual transformer that would be installed within the towers.

Then there is a series of attacks that don't actually even defend the position... It's just a naked claim with no substance.

Btw, transformers are not placed on the outer wall of high rises, the are placed in electrical rooms. They are also not placed in stairwells, etc...

Further, transformer explosions happen because the insulation of the wires of the coils in the transformer degrades and eventually creates a short circuit within the transformer, that arcing heats the oil that's commonly used to keep them cool.

If the power gets cut the TX will likely not explode at all.

But whatever, the contrarians will dispute this too in all likelihood.
 
To post 759 to 767:

It's clear you all just heard that transformers can explode, I showed the explosion of a transformer that would be larger than any individual transformer that would be installed within the towers.

Then there is a series of attacks that don't actually even defend the position... It's just a naked claim with no substance.

Btw, transformers are not placed on the outer wall of high rises, the are placed in electrical rooms. They are also not placed in stairwells, etc...

Further, transformer explosions happen because the insulation of the wires of the coils in the transformer degrades and eventually creates a short circuit within the transformer, that arcing heats the oil that's commonly used to keep them cool.

If the power gets cut the TX will likely not explode at all.

But whatever, the contrarians will dispute this too in all likelihood.

All of which gets you not one tiny step closer to demonstrating bombs in the buildings.
 
All of which gets you not one tiny step closer to demonstrating bombs in the buildings.

Holy non-sequitur, although...

"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

And the transformer theory is just another in the list of impossible explanations.
 
The electrical transformer in my back yard blew up last summer. It was quite loud.

what causes a transformer to blow up mark

explain what exactly happens to cause the phenomena you claim,

and

what makes you think that happened since the power was on in each case until it was demolished.
 
Holy non-sequitur, although...

"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

And the transformer theory is just another in the list of impossible explanations.

Impossible?

What is impossible about transformers exploding and being one of the sources of noise?

So, a very real phenomenon is "impossible" but (relatively) noiseless explosives and non-existant thermite are "plausible"?

Maybe 'impossible' is another work that means something different in TRUTHERVILLE....
 
Holy non-sequitur, although...

"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

And the transformer theory is just another in the list of impossible explanations.

its one of the more loony debunker arguments, no one will have a clue how a transformer would blow with regard to the wtc and sanders really screwed them with his description so they will dodge my question if they do have a clue.

I guess the terrorists planted transformers.
 
Last edited:
its one of the more loony debunker arguments, no one will have a clue how it happens.

I guess the terrorists planted transformers.

Lmao... Well, you can see in post 773 how quickly they'll try to conflate multiple issues as a single one in order to maintain some veil of consistency to the point.
 
Back
Top Bottom