Except like everything else you faithfully parrot from the OCT, that has never been proven or scientifically shown to be true and therefore is not an example of any kind.
Sure it has Bob. Just work the problem front to back for a change, starting from what is known:
1. We know Flights 11 and 175 took off that morning and were tracked all the way to their impacts with the North and South Towers respectively
2. We know both impacts were observed by hundreds (Flight 11) and millions (Flight 175) of witnesses respectively and both impacts were caught on film and video.
3. We know both towers suffered heavy structural damage from the impacts. Perimeter column damage could be observed externally.
4. We know intense fires broke out all the way across multiple floors simultaneously and that the spread of these fires was aided by the impact damage
5. We know there were no effective efforts to fight or suppress these fires and that fire protection systems were compromised by the impacts
6. We know that prior to collapse both towers showed obvious signs of structural instability - window breakage in the lobbies, creaking, moaning and shifting of the structure, visible lean, etc, etc, etc,...
7. We know that in the minutes prior to collapse floor trusses and perimeter columns in both towers were visibly buckling.
8. We know that collapse initiation in both towers was at the level of the aircraft impacts.
Prima facie, the collapse of both Twin Towers was due to the combined effects of high speed impact of a large aircraft (each equal to more than a ton of TNT) with the resulting structural damage with prolonged exposure of exposed steel to intense heat which weakened the remaining structure to a point where over time it could not support the load and it failed. That's where we get starting at the beginning and working with known facts (Note: none of this has anything to do with whether or not 9/11 was perpetrated by the evil government. It is in fact totally possible to accept airplane impact + fire + time + gravity as the proximate cause of building collapse AND believe da gubmint did it).
Except if that were true, there would be no need for a CD industry. If it were true, all that would ever be needed to bring a building down globally and in a matter of minutes is to set it on fire. And of course you can show many examples of that can't you?
Hyperobole much? :naughty
I would think it would be very messy and expensive to go around flying planes into buildings in the middle of a crowded city. The opportunities for litigation would certainly make this a non-starter. And don't even think about the environmental impact studies that would need to be done! :doh
Deny all you want, the proof is the videos. One only needs a working pair of eyes and a brain with adequate intellectual capacity to see and understand the nearly identical similarity.
So why exactly did you post a video that validated, indeed demonstrates every complaint I had, that shows all the methods used to deceive people about what they are viewing? I pointed out specifically what those techniques of dishonesty are and they are all displayed here. Do you still not see it?
