Buck Naked
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 240
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: 9/11 Truth Group after 9 years finally appears to do something useful.
Post 1364, thread: “9/11 - Did the towers fall at free-fall speeds?,
Post 77, thread: “So NIST lied about the failure mechanism of WTC 7 in the 911 Official Report?,
Post 345, thread: “An exercise in logic”,
Post 321, thread: “An exercise in logic”,
Post 123, thread: “Freefall and building 7 on 9/11”,
Post 1174, thread: “NIST’s Fraudulent Report on the collapse of WTC7 on 9/11”,
ETc, etc, etc…. You clearly didn't understand what a curtain wall was at the time.
I wouldn't know since I can assure you I have never, ever made such a claim. You are, yet again seriously mistaken.
Post 1364, thread: “9/11 - Did the towers fall at free-fall speeds?,
Mark F said:The curtain wall was the last part of the building to collapse
The building interior as already mentioned collapsed first, followed by the curtain wall which twisted and contorted on its way down due to the lack of bracing from the interior allowing it to keep its shape. All you have to do is watch the roofline as first the interior collapses, then the curtain wall to see how the building very obviously deforms during the event.
Post 77, thread: “So NIST lied about the failure mechanism of WTC 7 in the 911 Official Report?,
Mark F said:The curtain wall was not sufficiently rigid or supported to be able to stand on its own for more than a few seconds.
Post 345, thread: “An exercise in logic”,
Mark F said:The curtain wall is not the building, it is only a curtain wall and we know the building collapsed first leaving the curtain wall to stand very briefly in an effectively un-braced state.
Post 321, thread: “An exercise in logic”,
Post 352, thread: “An exercise in logic”,Mark F said:The part that you are referring to isn't even the building, it is the exterior curtain wall, left behind when the interior collapsed leaving the curtain wall as an un-supported empty shell.
Mark F said:The curtain wall is no concoction. It was how the building was designed. You should actually become at least somewhat familiar with the material before you start telling someone they are wrong. It doesn't do anything for your credibility.
Post 123, thread: “Freefall and building 7 on 9/11”,
Mark F said:What did Chandler and NIST actually measure and how to arrive at 2.25 seconds of G? Did they measure the whole building? No. The information comes from a single point on the NW corner of the curtain wall. This can not possibly be used to represent the entire building as that would require data from multiple points - and an acknowledgement that the interior structure collapsed prior to the collapse of the curtain wall.
Post 1174, thread: “NIST’s Fraudulent Report on the collapse of WTC7 on 9/11”,
Mark F said:Doesn't the fact the EPH came down first, followed by the core, followed by the curtain wall by definition make the collapse of 7 World Trade not symmetrical? By my count that is 3 distinct stages.
ETc, etc, etc…. You clearly didn't understand what a curtain wall was at the time.