• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

9/11 Attack on Pentagon

Captain America

Captain America

Jedi Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
25,131
Reaction score
16,010
Location
Wisconsin
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Not trying to suggest any conspiracy theories here, I just thought that was an interesting presentation.....

Rumor has it that this presentation has been shut down before on several occassions so watch it here before big brother shuts this one down too.

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
 
Ya I have seen that about a year or two ago .... Another wet dream for the conspuracy theroist. And a guy with a lot of time on his hands and a "Flash for dummies" book...
 
Good morning C2C. You are convinced that the pentagon was attacked in the manner as described "officially?"

I haven't a clue myself. I always thought something about it wasn't copacetic. I still am a bit curious about all that but I have no hard evidence to counter the claim. It may not pass the smell test or the gut feeling but be darned if I can tell you why.

I think everyone is still a bit curious about it, or should be.

Perhaps I have just missed the "hard evidence" validating the government's official claim.

Still, that was quite interesting, no? Makes ya wanna say hmmmmmmmm....
 
Captain America said:
Good morning C2C. You are convinced that the pentagon was attacked in the manner as described "officially?"

I haven't a clue myself. I always thought something about it wasn't copacetic. I still am a bit curious about all that but I have no hard evidence to counter the claim. It may not pass the smell test or the gut feeling but be darned if I can tell you why.

I think everyone is still a bit curious about it, or should be.

Perhaps I have just missed the "hard evidence" validating the government's official claim.

Still, that was quite interesting, no? Makes ya wanna say hmmmmmmmm....
Click to expand...

What about the families of those on board? These people would have either been all false, all coerced, all bribed, or all in on it.... And no group of people this large could keep a secret that long. A plane traveling that fast hitting a large stone reenforced wall breaks into very small pieces, the momentum carrying till it loses its forward inertia. There was wreckage... it was just on the inside and not the outside. The wings didnt just sheer off and sit there, they folded back and continued forward is my guess. The 757 body width being a bit over only 12 feet would fit rather nicely in the 90 wide hole in the side of the pentagon. And a cruising speed of just under mach 1 (Mach .080) the very fragile wings would not provide a lot of destructive power. Course I am not an expert and these are just my opinions. I think this like the other theroies are straws to be grasped at by those that want to think they know something other people don't.

And good morning to you Captain
 
Well, like I said, I haven't a clue. But from what I have been shown, or seen on TV or the internet, is sure is a clean crash site. But I suppose you do have something when you say at that speed disintegration is surely possible. However, we all can agree that certain things would not have shattered into tiny pieces. If the media would have shown more of that evidence, I think more people would be at ease with the explaination......
 
Captain America said:
Well, like I said, I haven't a clue. But from what I have been shown, or seen on TV or the internet, is sure is a clean crash site. But I suppose you do have something when you say at that speed disintegration is surely possible. However, we all can agree that certain things would not have shattered into tiny pieces. If the media would have shown more of that evidence, I think more people would be at ease with the explaination......
Click to expand...

I think the fact that most of it was on the interior and there is only so much filming there going to allow on the inside area of the pentagon. I do believe though that no matter what... your always going ot get the tin foil hat crew that thinks theres more to the story, and it was the governments fault. Sometimes a duck is just a duck....
 
Calm2Chaos said:
I think the fact that most of it was on the interior and there is only so much filming there going to allow on the inside area of the pentagon. I do believe though that no matter what... your always going ot get the tin foil hat crew that thinks theres more to the story, and it was the governments fault. Sometimes a duck is just a duck....
Click to expand...

No doubt dude...... this story is easy pickin's for a person like that.
 
Captain America said:
Not trying to suggest any conspiracy theories here, I just thought that was an interesting presentation.....

Rumor has it that this presentation has been shut down before on several occassions so watch it here before big brother shuts this one down too.

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
Click to expand...

So, if it wasn't an airplane, then who, what, and why?
 
I don't have any answers myself. I'm betting it was crazed Muslim fanatics because they are a buncha <self-edit>

What else, given the timing, could it have possibly been?
 
Captain America said:
I don't have any answers myself. I'm betting it was crazed Muslim fanatics because they are a buncha <self-edit>

What else, given the timing, could it have possibly been?
Click to expand...

Even if it wasn't an airplane, I wouldn't be surprised if the gov't would cover-up something. Hell, they won't even tell us the truth about Roswell, Kecksburg, or the lights over DC in the 50's.
 
They could remove all doubt by releasing all the security camera footage they confiscated from nearby businesses or by having not confiscated it at all.
 
I'm surprised this keeps coming up. There was abundant evidence that what was said to have happened did happen. Barbara Olson, the wife of the solicitor general, Ted Olson was killed in the crash. She appeared frequently on television.
 
Missouri Mule said:
I'm surprised this keeps coming up. There was abundant evidence that what was said to have happened did happen. Barbara Olson, the wife of the solicitor general, Ted Olson was killed in the crash. She appeared frequently on television.
Click to expand...

Its not that something didn't hit the pentagon. Its that it wasn't a plane. Maybe you should atleast know the story before you post about it.
 
Sir_Alec said:
Its not that something didn't hit the pentagon. Its that it wasn't a plane. Maybe you should atleast know the story before you post about it.
Click to expand...

I thought I went over this in the "9/11 was and inside job" thread. I guess if my posts can't be rebuked there, just go post somewhere else.

This thread should be merged with that thread. I ain't saying it twice.
 
Donkey1499 said:
Even if it wasn't an airplane, I wouldn't be surprised if the gov't would cover-up something. Hell, they won't even tell us the truth about Roswell, Kecksburg, or the lights over DC in the 50's.
Click to expand...

I think this has been planned for years if not decades. Since it was not a plane what was it? If it was a missile how in the hell do stupid terrorists get a missle? It had to have been done by people with access to a small plane and a missile. Who in the hell has access to a missile other than the military. You could say that the terrorists got a missile themselves, but they needed some form of help.

Warning: !The below statement is not my personal opinion cus I think Aliens did it!

Now this is where I sound like a crazy idiot. Say that someone in America with power and money wants his agenda to be fulfilled. My highest candidates for this someone would be a military general or a corporate president. Somehow that someone could have gone to a group of terrorists and planned an attack. I think someone got a missile for the pentagon, explosives for the wtcs, and also worked itself way into the gov't to dictate what we learned about the attacks after they happened. Then the terrorists did their thing at the wtcs while someone killed all of the pentagon bound 757 passengers and grounded it while a missile was launched by the smaller low flying plane into the pentagon.

Since the theory above is so dark and spooky I could see why the gov't would not want to release it. My point is is that there was no way that the terrorists did this alone. If it wasn't done by people of power in our nation it was aliens. And you never know. This could have been planned by the new world order or the freemasons, but my money is still on the aliens.
 
teacher said:
I thought I went over this in the "9/11 was and inside job" thread. I guess if my posts can't be rebuked there, just go post somewhere else.

This thread should be merged with that thread. I ain't saying it twice.
Click to expand...

I never read that thread so stop bugging me.
 
Sir_Alec said:
I never read that thread so stop bugging me.
Click to expand...

Oh, I see, you just post there.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=253582&postcount=1210

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=253572&postcount=1208

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=253183&postcount=1203

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=253182&postcount=1202

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=253144&postcount=1200

Come on Sir. Can I call you Sir? You've got to do better than that.

And it's pestering, not bugging.

Bugging is just rude.

Pestering is done with love.
 
Sir_Alec said:
Its not that something didn't hit the pentagon. Its that it wasn't a plane. Maybe you should atleast know the story before you post about it.
Click to expand...

It was a plane, or a really fast moving white chetah and if you think it wasn't then your tin foil hat is on wayyyy to ttight..... LOL Maybe just maybe it was a large interstellar mother ship dropping out of hyperdrive at the wrong moment is it was passing through earths unstable biomagnetic subconscious field. Thus creating a slight rip in the space time continuim. Upon entry of this plane/chetah the molecular breakdown of the basic atomic elements began with the sudden apperance of a white object racing towrds a pentagon, then disappearing leaving only bit and pieces... Clearly a government plot

:lol:
 
Last edited:
[Moderator Mode]

Moved to the usual home...

[/Moderator Mode]
 
Wouldnt they have atleast found the tail of the plane?
 
Davo said:
Wouldnt they have atleast found the tail of the plane?
Click to expand...

How much of anything would be left when an aluminum aircraft hits a masonry building at 400 mph? There were eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft coming in and there were some pieces scattered around the crash site. How many pieces were left of Flight 93 in Pennysylvania. Seems just like a black hole in the ground.

There's no mystery here. It happened just like the official reports said it happened.
 
Sir_Alec said:
Its not that something didn't hit the pentagon. Its that it wasn't a plane. Maybe you should atleast know the story before you post about it.
Click to expand...

Where is Barbara Olson?
 
Missouri Mule said:
How much of anything would be left when an aluminum aircraft hits a masonry building at 400 mph? There were eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft coming in and there were some pieces scattered around the crash site. How many pieces were left of Flight 93 in Pennysylvania. Seems just like a black hole in the ground.

There's no mystery here. It happened just like the official reports said it happened.
Click to expand...


I don't understand how they did it but more and more I beleive something is fishy here. I do beleive most of the official reports but if the FBI want to prove all those that don't beleive wrong why don't they release the other security camera's that would've caught the plane flying right into the building. That's the part that gets me. what are they hiding by not releasing the tapes? and how come there were FBI agents getting those tapes minutes after the plane hit?
 
americanwoman said:
I don't understand how they did it but more and more I beleive something is fishy here. I do beleive most of the official reports but if the FBI want to prove all those that don't beleive wrong why don't they release the other security camera's that would've caught the plane flying right into the building. That's the part that gets me. what are they hiding by not releasing the tapes? and how come there were FBI agents getting those tapes minutes after the plane hit?
Click to expand...

Where is Barbara Olson?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom