unlawflcombatnt
New member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2005
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
My good fellow unlawflcombatnt,unlawflcombatnt said:....http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904#survey
How many here think Bush should be impeached?
Conflict said:... arrested and charged with Treason, Obstruction, Extortion, and Racketeering.....
G.W. said:
Hey Conflict,
While you are sitting in your coshi–couch and clicking your mouse, I am here protecting and preserving your Wal-Mart way of life. You think it is easy to be confronted by bunch of Treacherous Islamic Fanatics who are waiting for me to drop the soup?
In brief, respectfully: HUAHHH
(I was in reserve)
G.W.
Owch. Cutting back on the budget that much? Must hurt like the blazes to have to use that when having the runs from too much alcohol. And blowing your nose after snorting a few lines must also be hell. :lol:G.W. said:My good fellow unlawflcombatnt,
I am kina disappointed that the MSNBC-report is not on a good quality paper, since lately, at the White House, we switched from softto a cheaper brand , because of budget deficit.
G.W.
PS: my respectful statement in the young drunk days would had been:
Lefty said:......Bush impeached, but I can't.
........allow it. If the Democrats win big in 2006, which I'm expecting.
galenrox said:[mod mode]
:smash:
alright, you've been warned about this already. All of your posts have been entirely pointless. You're getting formally warned now, and if this happens again you'll be taking a vacation. This is absolutely proposterous.
[/mod mode]
galenrox said:[mod mode]
:smash:
alright, you've been warned about this already. All of your posts have been entirely pointless. You're getting formally warned now, and if this happens again you'll be taking a vacation. This is absolutely proposterous.
[/mod mode]
Yeah, 86 million folks.RightatNYU said:The actual percentage is 32% who want him impeached, as of 2 weeks ago. Probably the same amount who hated him when he came into office. wooooo.
Again roughly the same as Clinton's #s.RightatNYU said:Interestingly enough, 58% of people do not want him impeached, and people said 52-30 that they would be less likely to vote for a Congressperson who tried to impeach him.
Simon W. Moon said:Yeah, 86 million folks.
At some points, roughly as many Americans wanted Clinton impeached.
Again roughly the same as Clinton's #s.
GWB is in about the same impeachment territory pollwise as Clinton was.
If it contents you to think so, feel free. As it's so far outside the realm of what I posted, I'm not sure how to address your comments.Stinger said:So is that the basis of an impeachment? And unscientific poll?
Stinger said:So is that the basis of an impeachment? And unscientific poll? BTW Rasmuen's poll was reported last week as 2/3's support the spying, kinda knocks this thread out of th water doesn't it.
Lefty said:Now that poll wasn't asking the right question, it showed that 68% of people were in support of the spying on terrorists, not in suppport of spying without a warrant. Very big difference. I for example suppport spying on terrorists, I just think our government should get a warrant before they do so.
Currently the only poll that I'm aware of shows that more than half of those polled did not think that the war justifies the surveillence.
What was the question exactly? Do you have the wording available? AFAICT, what you posted doesn't address the issue of the necessity of warrants whatsoever.Stinger said:Nope
December 28, 2005--Sixty-four percent (64%) of Americans believe the National Security Agency (NSA) should be allowed to intercept telephone conversations between terrorism suspects in other countries and people living in the United States. A Rasmussen Reports survey found that just 23% disagree.
They support what we are doing. NSA doesn't get warrants. If he meant with a warrant as is not being done he would have asked it.
Simon W. Moon said:What was the question exactly? Do you have the wording available? AFAICT, what you posted doesn't address the issue of the necessity of warrants whatsoever.
Simon W. Moon said:What was the question exactly? Do you have the wording available? AFAICT, what you posted doesn't address the issue of the necessity of warrants whatsoever.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?