5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister - CNN.com
Does it take a good 2 year old with a gun to stop a bad 5 year old with a gun?
Or "Guns don't kill people, 5 year olds kill their little sisters"?
This isn't baiting, it's just the stance gun owners have taken in the gun debate which clearly doesn't apply to this case. I simply stated this to make a bigger point, and I have more points. It pretty much puts these straw man troll, bias arguments to rest.
So should we "punish" other 5 year olds with guns with a gun safety course just because there was one bad apple?
This really kind of breaks it down doesn't it? I understand the selfish perspective that "I'm a good person, don't punish me for what others do" but I also don't ignore the fact that I was raised different and if others had the Rights I deserve it might put my family in danger.
Gun Regulation/Control does not mean Gun Confiscation. In fact most think that a lack of Regulation will actually end in Confiscation.
So the question is this;
Do you oppose a mandatory gun safety course (different for all guns, of different dangers). The course would probably have boring video's of incidents like this. To most it would be common sense but like everyone says, "common sense is different for different people"
Because no matter what the responses are.....that 2 year old had Rights too, not just the 5 year old gunner.