• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

5 Things many Witnesses may come to regret sooner or later.

Trinitarians also claim to have only one God, go figure. It was the religious leaders and Priests who had Jesus killed.....the religious leaders of his day.

And yes they were all Jewish…no trinitarians in sight….
 
And yes they were all Jewish…no trinitarians in sight….

Correct, Jesus wasn't trinitarian nor were the first Christians, none of them were trinitarians......they came later.
 
Jesus’ Trial. When Jesus was brought to trial before the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, he was charged by the religious leaders with grave offenses: “subverting [the Jewish] nation and forbidding the paying of taxes to Caesar and saying he himself is Christ a king.” (Lu 23:1, 2) This three-pronged charge actually meant they were accusing Jesus of high treason or, as the Romans expressed it, crimen laesae majestatis (today called lèse-majesté). Pilate recognized this because later he said, “You brought this man to me as one inciting the people to revolt.” (Lu 23:13, 14) In 48 B.C.E., the law called lex Julia majestatis had made it an offense to engage in any activity against the sovereign power of Rome. This law was given broad application so that, by Jesus’ time, virtually any insult to Caesar or any activity giving an outward appearance of sedition could be the basis for the charge of treason. Tiberius, the Caesar then reigning, was particularly sensitive to criticism or opposition, and his rule was noted for the encouragement of “informers” who would bring accusations against supposed traitors.

Throughout the Roman Empire no king could rule without Caesar’s consent. Thus, Pilate, in questioning Jesus, apparently concentrated his interrogation on the issue of Jesus’ kingship. (Mt 27:11; Mr 15:2; Lu 23:3; Joh 18:33-37) Pilate endeavored to free Jesus as guiltless, but the Jewish leaders cried out: “If you release this man, you are not a friend of Caesar. Every man making himself a king speaks against Caesar.” (Joh 19:12) The term “friend of Caesar” was a title of honor often bestowed on provincial governors; but the Jewish leaders here evidently used it in a general way, implying that Pilate was laying himself open to the charge of condoning high treason. Fear of a jealous emperor was a factor influencing Pilate in pronouncing the death sentence on an innocent man. Meanwhile the priests loudly proclaimed their loyalty to the imperial throne, saying, “We have no king but Caesar,” thereby rejecting any theocratic rule. (Joh 19:13-16; compare Isa 9:6, 7; 33:22.) They objected in vain to the title “King of the Jews” that Pilate had placed on Jesus’ stake. (Joh 19:19-22) The Romans customarily posted a sign identifying the crime for which a criminal was condemned.
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200000852
 
Those with the trinity doctrine ingrained into their psyche are the most hateful, bigoted, hypocritical Christians I have come across in my lifetime, fyi. I am not JW

Are JW's allowed to have close non JW friends? - Jehovah's Witness

John Free

It is unusual for a JW to become a close friend with a 'worldly' person. And that is how every person outside the religion is referred to. Perhaps you expressed an interest in his beliefs in the past? That is the main motive I can think of for him drawing close to you.

The JW movement is often described as totalizing, ----->they believe they and they alone<----- serve God and that ----->everyone outside the religion is influenced by Satan.<----- and will shortly be killed by God at Armageddon. Hence the world to a JW is a dark and dangerous place and they are not to make friends with 'worldly people'.
 
Jesus’ Trial. When Jesus was brought to trial before the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, he was charged by the religious leaders with grave offenses: “subverting [the Jewish] nation and forbidding the paying of taxes to Caesar and saying he himself is Christ a king.” (Lu 23:1, 2) This three-pronged charge actually meant they were accusing Jesus of high treason or, as the Romans expressed it, crimen laesae majestatis (today called lèse-majesté). Pilate recognized this because later he said, “You brought this man to me as one inciting the people to revolt.” (Lu 23:13, 14) In 48 B.C.E., the law called lex Julia majestatis had made it an offense to engage in any activity against the sovereign power of Rome. This law was given broad application so that, by Jesus’ time, virtually any insult to Caesar or any activity giving an outward appearance of sedition could be the basis for the charge of treason. Tiberius, the Caesar then reigning, was particularly sensitive to criticism or opposition, and his rule was noted for the encouragement of “informers” who would bring accusations against supposed traitors.

Throughout the Roman Empire no king could rule without Caesar’s consent. Thus, Pilate, in questioning Jesus, apparently concentrated his interrogation on the issue of Jesus’ kingship. (Mt 27:11; Mr 15:2; Lu 23:3; Joh 18:33-37) Pilate endeavored to free Jesus as guiltless, but the Jewish leaders cried out: “If you release this man, you are not a friend of Caesar. Every man making himself a king speaks against Caesar.” (Joh 19:12) The term “friend of Caesar” was a title of honor often bestowed on provincial governors; but the Jewish leaders here evidently used it in a general way, implying that Pilate was laying himself open to the charge of condoning high treason. Fear of a jealous emperor was a factor influencing Pilate in pronouncing the death sentence on an innocent man. Meanwhile the priests loudly proclaimed their loyalty to the imperial throne, saying, “We have no king but Caesar,” thereby rejecting any theocratic rule. (Joh 19:13-16; compare Isa 9:6, 7; 33:22.) They objected in vain to the title “King of the Jews” that Pilate had placed on Jesus’ stake. (Joh 19:19-22) The Romans customarily posted a sign identifying the crime for which a criminal was condemned.
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200000852

Think on that for a minute........today they believe man killed God, not just a god but a Godman......let that sink in. They've raised themselves up to a being equally superior to God, even capable of killing God. It's amazing the things people can be talked into believing and this has been going on for many centuries having the power of tradition and the commandments of man with the threat of Dante's hell, most conveniently submit or too lazy to pray/study to learn.

Even after being risen and glorified they can't get rid of their flesh and the worshipping of it.......it's incredible.
 

Are JW's allowed to have close non JW friends? - Jehovah's Witness

John Free

It is unusual for a JW to become a close friend with a 'worldly' person. And that is how every person outside the religion is referred to. Perhaps you expressed an interest in his beliefs in the past? That is the main motive I can think of for him drawing close to you.

The JW movement is often described as totalizing, ----->they believe they and they alone<----- serve God and that ----->everyone outside the religion is influenced by Satan.<----- and will shortly be killed by God at Armageddon. Hence the world to a JW is a dark and dangerous place and they are not to make friends with 'worldly people'.

Answer:

I don't believe everything written, said, or passed on from others that has a negative connotation or the thought of ridicule. Nor do I have much respect for those who do it.
 

Logic, maybe you can Friend miss Daisy?
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=46ed...3dlZC1oYXZlLWNsb3NlLW5vbi1qdy1mcmllbmRz&ntb=1

John Free

It is unusual for a JW to become a close friend with a 'worldly' person. And that is how every person outside the religion is referred to. Perhaps you expressed an interest in his beliefs in the past? That is the main motive I can think of for him drawing close to you.

go ahead and start today Logic, send a PM with a few flowers.

The JW movement is often described as totalizing, ----->they believe they and they alone<----- serve God and that ----->everyone outside the religion is influenced by Satan.<-----

Logic, this isn't tooo far from wrong on this forum.


and will shortly be killed by God at Armageddon. Hence the world to a JW is a dark and dangerous place and they are not to make friends with 'worldly people'.

so you not gonna be friends, or what?


.
 
Answer:

I don't believe everything written, said, or passed on from others that has a negative connotation or the thought of ridicule. Nor do I have much respect for those who do it.
No doubt modern trinitarian Christians feel the same in regards to your unproven, asinine positive claim that those modern day trinitarian Christians "would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."

Let that fact sink in and come down off of your self-serving, self-righteous non-trinitarian pedestal.
 
Answer:

I don't believe everything written, said, or passed on from others that has a negative connotation or the thought of ridicule. Nor do I have much respect for those who do it.
Apostate sites are full of exes with axes to grind...
 
No doubt modern trinitarian Christians feel the same in regards to your unproven, asinine positive claim that those modern day trinitarian Christians "would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."

Let that fact sink in and come down off of your self-serving, self-righteous non-trinitarian pedestal.

he didn't mean it that way.

i don't mean it that way.

are you being mean?


1750803022952.webp...blessings, we still have 2 weeks to go, even after 12 days of that Big, well Big war.

Rapture calling, but you must open the door friends.


.
 
No doubt modern trinitarian Christians feel the same in regards to your unproven, asinine positive claim that those modern day trinitarian Christians "would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."

Let that fact sink in and come down off of your self-serving, self-righteous non-trinitarian pedestal.

Your opine means what?......do I care?.....should I care? You are only here for divisional purposes and that's clear as a bell.
 
No doubt modern trinitarian Christians feel the same in regards to your unproven, asinine positive claim that those modern day trinitarian Christians "would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."

Let that fact sink in and come down off of your self-serving, self-righteous non-trinitarian pedestal.
Dont forget executing people for thought crimes too 😉
 
You are only here for divisional purposes and that's clear as a bell.
And when you willfully, fallaciously, and with malice aforethought accuse 2 billion plus modern day trinitarian Christians of the below:

👇

Redbeer said:
"would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."


you are doing so to "unite" the Christian community? Correct @redbeer?
 
Dont forget executing people for thought crimes too 😉
Here is a link to another "religion of Abraham" that frowns upon perceived "thought crimes." Birds of a feather and all of that good stuff. :rolleyes:

Muslims ‘criminalised for silly thoughts’

Muhammad Abdul Bari said police and prosecutors were criminalising youths for harbouringsilly thoughts
 
And when you willfully, fallaciously, and with malice aforethought accuse 2 billion plus modern day trinitarian Christians of the below:

👇

Redbeer said:
"would kill and steal to save the trinity doctrine if the governing powers allowed it."


you are doing so to "unite" the Christian community? Correct @redbeer?

Lol, here comes the drama, lol. This is a habit with you, like stages of debate, lol. "Malice aforethought"......:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:, now that's funny.

A three person, singular being......Dante's hell.....immortal soul.....prophecy guru's proven wrong for millennia.....hundreds of thousands of church bldgs sitting empty except a couple of hours on Wednesday evening, and a couple of more on Sunday morning worth untold billions of dollars.....preachers with pretty hairdos and lying lips, thousand dollar suits and gold watches.....well, you get the picture.

No, I have zero intention of uniting with this group of believers.
 
Lol, here comes the drama, lol. This is a habit with you, like stages of debate, lol. "Malice aforethought"......:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:, now that's funny.

A three person, singular being......Dante's hell.....immortal soul.....prophecy guru's proven wrong for millennia.....hundreds of thousands of church bldgs sitting empty except a couple of hours on Wednesday evening, and a couple of more on Sunday morning worth untold billions of dollars.....preachers with pretty hairdos and lying lips, thousand dollar suits and gold watches.....well, you get the picture.

No, I have zero intention of uniting with this group of believers.
Almost seven years of being here at DP and 72 years of living on this planet with and among self-professed "Christians".

Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian advocate for people to be "killed for thought crimes."
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian "guarantee" modern day trinitarian Christians would "kill and steal to save a trinity theology."


Both extremist posts/declarations/positive assertions were put forth by "non-trinitarian" Christians.
 
Almost seven years of being here at DP and 72 years of living on this planet with and among self-professed "Christians".

Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian advocate for people to be "killed for thought crimes."
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian "guarantee" modern day trinitarian Christians would "kill and steal to save a trinity theology."


Both extremist posts/declarations/positive assertions were put forth by "non-trinitarian" Christians.

Because they are openly destroying the names, reputations and character of untold tens of thousands as we speak for only refusing to believe their lovely trinity doctrine. Right now, they murder by the words which come out of their mouth, which is worse than a bullet or a knife, for people are not only killed once, but many, many times for some, the rest of their lives and all because of this trinity doctrine. People they've never met, never spoken to, but through listening to and the cultural and social power they have influence the minds of people to look down at disdain only because of this lovely trinity doctrine.

Several hundred years ago it was much worse, for they were tortured, their land stolen, and ultimately killed in unthinkable manners, some thrown into dungeons and left to rot. Walk into a trinitarian teaching church and start disputing their lovely doctrine and see what happens to you, keep going back and keep attempting to make friends once you spoke your mind......watch closely what will happen to you.

It's the "doctrine", for it's venom, plain and simple.
 
murder by the words which come out of their mouth
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian advocate for people to be "killed for thought crimes."
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian "guarantee" modern day trinitarian Christians would "kill and steal to save a trinity theology."



Religious Extremism

 
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian advocate for people to be "killed for thought crimes."
Only once have I ever seen or heard any Christian "guarantee" modern day trinitarian Christians would "kill and steal to save a trinity theology."



Religious Extremism


:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:......I guess this is where I'm supposed to be intimidated, lol. Is this all you have?
 
Back
Top Bottom