- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 12,477
- Reaction score
- 2,583
- Location
- New Jersey
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
New World Translation v Darby Translation - Mat 17:21; 18:11
New World Translation v King James Version - Mat 23:14; Mar 7:16
New World Translation v 1599 Geneva Bible - Mrk 9:44,46; 11:26
New World Translation v Wycliffe Bible - Mrk 15:28; Luk 17:36
New World Translation v New King James Version - Luk 23:17; Joh 5:4
New World Translation v The Voice - John 7:53; Act 8:37
New World Translation v New Century Version - Act 15:34; 24:7
New World Translation v Modern English Version - Acts 28:29; Rom 16:24;
After comparing eight bibles with the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (2013), evidence has been provided showing that:
New World Translation v Amplified Bible CE - Luk 1:28
New World Translation v BRG Bible - Act 24:6
New World Translation v Douay-Rheims 1899 - Act 24:8
New World Translation v JB Philips NT - Col 1:2
New World Translation v Jubilee Bible 2000 - Col 2:2
New World Translation v New Life Version - 1 Joh 5:7
New World Translation v World English Bible - 1 Joh 5:13
New World Translation v Young's Literal Translation - Rev 1:11
New World Translation v 21st Century KJV - Rev 2:15
New World Translation v Worldwide English NT - Rev 21:24
New World Translation v King James Version - Mat 23:14; Mar 7:16
New World Translation v 1599 Geneva Bible - Mrk 9:44,46; 11:26
New World Translation v Wycliffe Bible - Mrk 15:28; Luk 17:36
New World Translation v New King James Version - Luk 23:17; Joh 5:4
New World Translation v The Voice - John 7:53; Act 8:37
New World Translation v New Century Version - Act 15:34; 24:7
New World Translation v Modern English Version - Acts 28:29; Rom 16:24;
After comparing eight bibles with the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (2013), evidence has been provided showing that:
- A total of 17 single verses are missing from the bible used by Jehovah’s Witnesses.
- Most bibles do not have gaps at the aforementioned verses.
Partial Verses Omitted
In the New World Translation, there are partial omissions made to some of their verses. The omissions are underlined in the comparative verses.New World Translation v Amplified Bible CE - Luk 1:28
New World Translation v BRG Bible - Act 24:6
New World Translation v Douay-Rheims 1899 - Act 24:8
New World Translation v JB Philips NT - Col 1:2
New World Translation v Jubilee Bible 2000 - Col 2:2
New World Translation v New Life Version - 1 Joh 5:7
New World Translation v World English Bible - 1 Joh 5:13
New World Translation v Young's Literal Translation - Rev 1:11
New World Translation v 21st Century KJV - Rev 2:15
New World Translation v Worldwide English NT - Rev 21:24
Continued below
Last edited: