- Joined
- Nov 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,733
- Reaction score
- 2,439
- Location
- here
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Yes there are far to many laws being written. Mandatory minimum sentencing in some cases discourages corruption in some cases, though judges might also be held to higher standards. Convicts can already integrate into society and there are many public and volunteer agencies that will help them.
Drugs were never a real problem in the first half of the last century. What changed? It seems to me, with the influence of Hollywood and the entertainment industry, that drugs became 'cool' and relatively harmless. perhaps allowing drugs for everyone might thin out the herd a little bit and put Darwin's Theory to the test. Of course the down side would mean Conservatives consistently being elected to public office.
I don;;t know what you mean by "meaningful representation". Court appointed attorneys won't do? It seems that people are already being held accountable when they abuse citizens.
I could break the Internet linking you to stories about corruption in the justice system. I already linked to this once today, but it's a good example. Many kids went before these two corrupt judges without any representation at all. In the Miami Gardens case I linked earlier in this thread, the person in question -- a mentally challenged man -- was coerced into pleading guilty dozens of times.
Often, people of any race accused of crimes face a kind of systemic bigotry that makes it more difficult for them to exonerate themselves without ample resources, so they end up taking a plea regardless of their actual guilt or innocence.