What on earth are you talking about...?
You said that one man's hate is another man's love. If you loved all races equally, your political position would change. You claim to be of a superior race, and apparently you mean this in an absolute sense--i.e. that your racial superiority does not depend on point of view or opinion. But if that is so, then how is it possible for other races to love their race, and not yours? More to the point, how is it possible for someone such as me to love all races equally, and have an equal appreciation for them all? It seems to follow that the question of superiority is relative in much the same way as color preference and musical taste are relative.
I do not hate jews, I see them as an enemy to the people that I love. My desire to see them destoryed is an act of love for my people. Of course I don't expect you to understand that, but so be it...
No, I understand it--at least from an external point of view. I can imagine if someone were trying to kill my daughter, I probably wouldn't hate them, but I'd certainly kill them. But what you're talking about is different in that it's fairly clear you've got your facts wrong. I don't specifically know what you believe here, but you've given some indication that you believe roughly what Hitler did. As I studied Hitler, it became evident to me that he literally did believe there was a grand global conspiracy between the Jews (mainly) and the Bolsheviks to utterly impoverish and enslave the German people.
Now, that's an assertion that ought to be verifiable. We can imagine certain circumstances in which we could make a set of observations that would either confirm or disconfirm that hypothesis (I use the term loosely). Those circumstances and observations have come about and been made literally millions of times, and the weight of the evidence strongly disconfirms that hypothesis. Yet in spite of this, astoundingly, people such as you persist in believing what you do.
When the Einsatzgruppen began operating in Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc. and then later in the Soviet Union, when they pulled Jews from their homes, shot them, and confiscated their valuables, where was the evidence that there was a conspiracy? There should have been some kind of evidence, some documents, a series of communiques,
something that would indicate that these people--i.e. the ones about to be murdered--were involved in this conspiracy. Despite the obviousness of this, I never once read anything in the diaries or correspondence of the Einsatzgruppen that they found anything of the sort.
We might expect to find a profligate money trail leading to a cabal of Jews being leveraged against German stocks or other investment vehicles. While we might not think it surprising that the Jews don't invest heavily in German industry anymore, I have never seen anyone of your political bent submit a single solid analysis showing there to be a conspiracy. The only really vast and insidious economic conspiracy of which I am aware is right out in the open, and it was started by a group of Americans led by Clark Clifford in 1947. Clifford was a Protestant, IIRC.
We'd need to see, in any such analysis, only a few things that wouldn't be terribly difficult to prove:
1) That most of the world's Jews were knowingly invested in the scheme.
2) That the money flowed into a fund or series of funds that was being directed against German industry and business in one or more ways.
3) That, once the details are examined, no mitigating circumstances are found.
We might expect to see some effect from this supposed conspiracy. As it happens now, the German economy seems to be humming along smoothly. There don't appear to be any impending crises that would specifically affect Germany or the other Nordic countries. Even during the hyperinflation that occurred at the end of the Weimar Republic, the quite proximal cause of the Versailles Reparations seems to be the primary culprit. If it were some kind of conspiracy, especially one that you ought to be worried about, you'd expect to see the same thing happening again.
In point of fact, we are headed for a global economic meltdown, but it's not the Jews--or any one ethnic group--that are to blame. A combination of natural factors such as the impending peak in global oil production, climate change, topsoil errosion, aquifer depletion, and peaks in the production of other commodities are the primary culprits (which really means that we are all to blame). In the face of this, the central banks of the world, and the large transnational corporations, have partnered up in an attempt to loot the various economies of the world for all they're worth. But again, that's hardly because the Jews and the Bolsheviks are telling them to do so. Most of the people in charge of those institutions at least profess to be Christian.
And that's clearly a matter of opinion. But I am glad we can both agree that race does in fact exist.
1) Race clearly does exist--that's just our word for distinguishing groups sharing certain superficial characteristics. I can't look at a person and fail to notice their skin tone or other pronounced details of their appearance. The question is whether that, in turn, tells me anything of import about them. In my experience, it does not.
2) It's opinion only insofar as anything is ultimately an opinion. But where it is possible to take the measure of people's natural ability, inclination, and humanity, it turns out not to be the case that one race is really better than another. There are different cultures that, at this point in history, line up along racial lines. But given the foundation of simple biology, that's hardly surprising. What is also not surprising, but is completely damning to your case, is that there are many similarities between cultures that seem undeniable.
As I have said, race has nothing to do with intelligence. I don't know what your ethnicity is, but you're clearly a clever person.
I'd be the first to admit that intelligence is vastly over-rated in today's world. But I've never gotten a good "fix" on what you mean by superiority. You've made some references to culture, to aesthetics, etc. but they've been rather vague. Perhaps you could expound a little on just what you mean.
