- Joined
- Mar 21, 2005
- Messages
- 25,893
- Reaction score
- 12,484
- Location
- New York, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Seventeen Republicans voted for the resolution. Two Democrats, Jim Marshall of Georgia and Gene Taylor of Mississippi, voted against it. Mr. Marshall is the son and grandson of Army generals and was wounded in combat in Vietnam, according to The Almanac of American Politics. Mr. Taylor has a generally conservative voting record and is “strongly pro-defense,” the almanac says. Six representatives cast no vote.
Here's the Roll Call break down:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll099.xml
And the story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/16/world/middleeast/16cnd-cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
Reps who voted Yes:
Castle
Coble
Davis, Tom
Duncan
English (PA)
Gilchrest
LaTourette
Kirk
Keller
Jones (NC)
Johnson (IL)
Inglis (SC)
Paul
Petrie
Ramstad
Upton
Walsh (NY)
Abstentions:
Baird (D)
Boustany (R)
Davis, Jo Ann (R)
Hastert (R)
Lo Biando (R)
Nadler (D)
At least Nadler, who is technically my Rep, didn't vote against it.:lol:
I agree--a total and utter waste of time. What have we stooped to?
Nevertheless, I am happy to see Tom Davis voted yes, as he is my representative.
I agree--a total and utter waste of time. What have we stooped to?
Nevertheless, I am happy to see Tom Davis voted yes, as he is my representative.
I don't see the point in a non-binding resolution against the war. If they are pissed about it and think the President is handling this wrong; they need to cut the funding. That's part of their job as a check, they should just poo or get off the pot.
How long before we can label this a Do-Nothing Congress?:2razz:
2008.
....
You've got a Rep for a congressman?
Symbolism over substance... pure and simple, a complete waste of time...
Perhaps next week, they can hold a vote on a non-binding resolution on what type of toppings they want on their Friday afternoon pizza party... just so they let the President know what type of pizza they like...
Geez...
1441 was not a war resolution.Originally posted by KidRocks
On the contrary... this vote was substantial, it put people on record as having voted for or against come election time just like House and Senate vote approving the Iraq war resolution in United Nations Security Council... Resolution 1441.
Numbers 1 and 2 will happen, after victory is achieved or when a new President takes over. As for numbers 3 and 4, let us know how this works out for you. :lol:The Democrats need to realize they are heading for the same fate as the Republicans this past election unless they do what they were hired to do:That's the short list...
- End the war
- Bring the troops home
- Impeach the AWOL CINC
- And lock up every god-damn neocon from the Pacific to the Atlantic on charges of war crimes
Not so fast CA, how do we specifically know when 1 is acheived?Originally posted by CurrentAffairs:
Numbers 1 and 2 will happen, after victory is achieved or when a new President takes over. As for numbers 3 and 4, let us know how this works out for you.
Not so fast CA, how do we specifically know when 1 is acheived?
Don't cut and run...
Answer the question!
How long before we can label this a Do-Nothing Congress?:2razz:
You mean the "Do Nothing Congress" that did more in the first hundred hours than Republicans did in 12 years?
You mean the "Do Nothing Congress" that did more in the first hundred hours than Republicans did in 12 years?
I agree--a total and utter waste of time. What have we stooped to?
Nevertheless, I am happy to see Tom Davis voted yes, as he is my representative.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?