• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris

Swing and a miss and you fell down too. I said 51 intelligence officials. You moved the goalposts and said All intelligence officers. I never said All. That was you.

It's funny how you left wingers here rarely every comment on the subject at hand and y'all mainly stick to insults, vague posts or one liners.

You realize that anyone can see that's a transparent message board tactic when you have no response to refute the subject at hand. It's not working just like Kamala’s campaign.
Thanks for showing me what you are. I choose not to engage. 👋IMG_3989.webp
 
I have to say, I'm not sure how effective these kind of endorsements are in terms of convincing anyone since we're probably at a point where people have made up their minds on how they're voting. Those who don't trust experts aren't going to care, but there's also the point that every set of experts will have differing opinions so 23 top experts may agree and there may be 23 others who don't. The main concern with Trump's communicated economic plans are their inflationary risk since tariffs often have that effect.
And if Trump's tariffs ARE inflationary, guess who he'll blame.
 
Swing and a miss and you fell down too. I said 51 intelligence officials. You moved the goalposts and said All intelligence officers. I never said All. That was you.

It's funny how you left wingers here rarely every comment on the subject at hand and y'all mainly stick to insults, vague posts or one liners.

You realize that anyone can see that's a transparent message board tactic when you have no response to refute the subject at hand. It's not working just like Kamala’s campaign.
I find this post quite ironic. The poster is calling out "left wingers" for "rarely ever comment on the subject at hand" for not commenting on a post he made about the Hunter Biden laptop....

Good sir, the subject at hand is NOT the Hunter Biden laptop, its:

"23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris"


What on earth does Hunter Biden's laptop have to do with Kamala Harris's economic plan? Let me help you: absolutely nothing. Stick to the subject, please.



I know several people that live in Australia, the UK and Germany. None of them can understand why Trump is even allowed to run here. And they all are worried to death that America will become just like Russia or China, only radical right instead of left.
I live in Colorado and I have the same questions and concerns...

Wow!! Twenty-three economists? That must be at least 99.96% of all economists.
Its the subject here is not 23 economists, its "23 Nobel Prize-winning economists, that have slamed Trump agenda, endorse Harris.

Now I don't know how many living economists have won the Nobel Prize, a very, very elite accomplishment, but my guess is the 23 economist comprise almost ALL of the US economists that have achieved such stature.

Yeah, Krugman was one. That says it all. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!
...and what does it say? ...... do you have the professional credentials to take Krugman's arguments apart? Let's start with the fact that 22 other Nobel prize winning economists agree with him, so your credentials better be really, really impressive. Where did you do your PhD again?




Seems to be a lot of ADD among posters in this thread. Please slow down, read, think (maybe research), then post....

 
Last edited:
I find this post quite ironic. The poster is calling out "left wingers" for "rarely ever comment on the subject at hand" for not commenting on a post he made about the Hunter Biden laptop....

Good sir, the subject at hand is NOT the Hunter Biden laptop, its:

"23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris"


What on earth does Hunter Biden's laptop have to do with Kamala Harris's economic plan? Let me help you: absolutely nothing. Stick to the subject, please.

I live in Colorado and I have the same questions and concerns...

Its the subject here is not 23 economists, its "23 Nobel Prize-winning economists, that have slamed Trump agenda, endorse Harris.

Now I don't know how many living economists have won the Nobel Prize, a very, very elite accomplishment, but my guess is the 23 economist comprise almost ALL of the US economists that have achieved such stature.

...and what does it say? ...... do you have the professional credentials to take Krugman's arguments apart? Let's start with the fact that 22 other Nobel prize winning economists agree with him, so your credentials better be really, really impressive. Where did you do your PhD again?

Seems to be a lot of ADD among posters in this thread. Please slow down, read, think (maybe research), then post....
Ha! Nice rebuttal. You tore them a new one.
Look who also supports Kamala:


82 Nobel-Prize recipients in science fields endorse Harris

More than 80 Nobel Prize winners from a variety of scientific fields endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president, lauding her commitment to technology and research.

Why it matters: Scientific advancements and climate change responses would be undermined by former President Trump, the scientists warned during the final days of the razor-thin campaign.
The signatories are Nobel Prize recipients in chemistry, economics, medicine and physics from the 1970s to this year.

What they're saying: "The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are largely the result of advances in science and technology," the letter said.

"Kamala Harris recognizes this and understands that maintaining America's leadership in these fields requires budgetary support from the federal government, independent universities, and international collaboration."
 
Ha! Nice rebuttal. You tore them a new one.
Look who also supports Kamala:


82 Nobel-Prize recipients in science fields endorse Harris

More than 80 Nobel Prize winners from a variety of scientific fields endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris for president, lauding her commitment to technology and research.

Why it matters: Scientific advancements and climate change responses would be undermined by former President Trump, the scientists warned during the final days of the razor-thin campaign.
The signatories are Nobel Prize recipients in chemistry, economics, medicine and physics from the 1970s to this year.

What they're saying: "The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are largely the result of advances in science and technology," the letter said.

"Kamala Harris recognizes this and understands that maintaining America's leadership in these fields requires budgetary support from the federal government, independent universities, and international collaboration."
Thanks..... the state of current American politics has been well summed up by Neil deGrasse Tyson. It well reflects the settlements of those that still think.

462203908_9146469278715459_5967480530444400026_n.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom