- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 25,240
- Reaction score
- 24,034
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
You may enjoy the first few minutes of this youtube video.
Why would I enjoy the first few minutes of a QAnon clown show?
You may enjoy the first few minutes of this youtube video.
Maybe you're correct. Maybe you're not. Time will tell.
Well, the thing about alleging the biggest crime in US history is that you need to provide some evidence.
I “can’t claim them false?” Yes, I really can. The burden of proof is on the accuser. You’ve supported wild accusations with zero evidence. Courts have thrown this crap out over and over and over again.
Until you show evidence, it’s done. Disproven. Over. Biden won, fair and square. Deal with it.
You don't care for full employment, a return of manufacturing, the build up of the military, the destruction of ISIS, the emasculation of NoKo, repairing trade deals? Which policies did you not like?Which are just as problematic.
Did you not see the Penn state legislature during the first few minutes?? There are a few others but with poor sound.Why would I enjoy the first few minutes of a QAnon clown show?
Ya might wanna clue Jack Hays onto this finding.What I want to know is why when someone uses the phrase 'time will tell', they are almost always proven wrong.
I was referring to the Giuliani/Ellis circle jerk a QAnon clown show.Did you not see the Penn state legislature during the first few minutes?? There are a few others but with poor sound.
Or are you calling the legislature a clown or, a third alternative, you prefer to remain uninformed?
Why do you continue to lie about our new President to be, Joe Biden? Are you that threatened by him? Are you that afraid?None of that is as serious as Joe Biden's illness. All politicians and public speakers, even the most professional, make errors while speaking but Joe's problems are obviously mental.
Have no idea who that is.I was referring to the Giuliani/Ellis circle jerk a QAnon clown show.
The claim is the voting was in violation of their constitution.You cannot...and I’ll try to type this slowly for you...CHANGE ELECTION LAW AFTER THE VOTING.
It’s absurd that you think a judge would, or should, nullify millions of votes because of, basically, a technicality.
The time to bring this suit was before the election.
LOL, The Donald responded that way all the time. It's just one common example. And as you can see from that example, he cant remember ANYTHING. Nothing specific at all. He gets going and forgets what he's supposed to be talking about.And you think that compares to the three videos of Joe Biden's obvious dementia?
We could put up Obama and Bush gaffes also but they aren't consistent and no one was talking dementia, but it's apparent that Biden is affected. Even his wife has to play Edgar Bergen to his Charley McCarthy, having to remind him of Donald Trump's name.
This was really the best the Democrats had to offer, huh?
The Democrats were concentrating on the Presidency and couldn't spread themselves too thinly. Had the election not been mail in Trump would have won.
The claim is the voting was in violation of their constitution.
No, he's China all the way, the same as big tech.
You don't care for full employment, a return of manufacturing, the build up of the military, the destruction of ISIS, the emasculation of NoKo, repairing trade deals? Which policies did you not like?
The claim is the voting was in violation of their constitution.
You can’t change the rules after the game is played because you don’t like the outcome.
The Pennsylvania Constitution is clear.But the votes cast were not unconstitutional, only, allegedly, the process might have been.
I don't see any sane and rational judge tossing out those ballots already cast.
It isThe Pennsylvania Constitution is clear.
Love to hear your viewpoint on that. I thought it was pointed out.It is
And there’s a reason no one challenged the law BEFORE the election.
Isn't it funny how it's the democrats that gain votes in recounts?