2018 is on pace to be the 4th-hottest year on record [W:93]

[PoliSciXtina]

I like coloring books, follow the numbers and big crayolas myself.
I am sure you can relate. lolz

It’s clear you can’t be bothered with learning. You should stick to your coloring books.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[PoliSciXtina]

If, by settled science, do you mean EVERYONE agrees and there is NO dissent. Well, if that is your standard, I suppose. Then again, by that line of reasoning WWII did not end until 10 years ago, when the last Japanese soldiers came out of hiding...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/28/secondworldwar.japan

Is it "settled science" that 15 Saudi's (and 4 others) flew two American airliners (one UA and one AA) into the World Trade Center leading to their collapse. Yes, settled by reasonable standards, but you can find unreasonable people right here on DP that will tell you otherwise.

There is overwhelming affirmation within the scientific community that this is a real issue. There are only a handful (relatively speaking) number of persons that chose to defy science and write music to an odd beat.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...consensus-97-999-or-is-plate-tectonics-a-hoax

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-experts-agree-on-human-caused-global-warming

Very things have such universal acceptance as global warming. You might think about getting with the program. Others have (even though some won't admit it)

https://www.independent.co.uk/envir...l-it-threatened-his-golf-course-a7047486.html

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-experts-agree-on-human-caused-global-warming

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

You have a lot of patience. Based on their responses, I doubt they will read any of those links. But thanks for posting because I am reading!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trixare4kids]

It’s clear you can’t be bothered with learning. You should stick to your coloring books.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok. I'll do that once you decide to get over yourself, two whole college courses on climate change, Ms. science wizard. lolz

 

[PoliSciXtina]

Ok. I'll do that once you decide to get over yourself, two whole college courses on climate change, Ms. science wizard. lolz

I merely brought that up to show that I was interested enough in climate change to take courses on it. It was part of my bachelors degree in poli sci and part of my minor in public policy and I wanted to learn more about it. Why are you mocking me on the fact that I took college courses on this matter? I don’t understand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trixare4kids]

If, by settled science, do you mean EVERYONE agrees and there is NO dissent. Well, if that is your standard, I suppose. Then again, by that line of reasoning WWII did not end until 10 years ago, when the last Japanese soldiers came out of hiding...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/may/28/secondworldwar.japan

Is it "settled science" that 15 Saudi's (and 4 others) flew two American airliners (one UA and one AA) into the World Trade Center leading to their collapse. Yes, settled by reasonable standards, but you can find unreasonable people right here on DP that will tell you otherwise.

There is overwhelming affirmation within the scientific community that this is a real issue. There are only a handful (relatively speaking) number of persons that chose to defy science and write music to an odd beat.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...consensus-97-999-or-is-plate-tectonics-a-hoax

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-experts-agree-on-human-caused-global-warming

Very things have such universal acceptance as global warming. You might think about getting with the program. Others have (even though some won't admit it)

https://www.independent.co.uk/envir...l-it-threatened-his-golf-course-a7047486.html

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...-experts-agree-on-human-caused-global-warming

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...confirmed-fossil-fuels-role-in-global-warming



Yes, I have always admired the coloring job on your avatar. I know I can't stay inside the lines like that.

:yawn: Your links don't impress me.
Use your own words for a change.

 

[Bullseye]

I guess you failed to read that I took 2 college courses on climate change. I don’t claim to be a genius, but at least I’m informed enough to know that climate change is real and not a hoax. Can’t say the same about others on this thread who clearly can’t be bothered to google or read anything. Are you aware you can learn pretty much anything you want via the internet? Or do you just read printed books? Nothing wrong with that, but I have no idea why you’re knocking google or internet search engines.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quick question: Did the instructors in each of those course cover both pro and con arguments concerning man's effect on climate change?

 

[dobieg]

Quick question: Did the instructors in each of those course cover both pro and con arguments concerning man's effect on climate change?

Lol


Spit on my laptop when I read that one.

 

[Bullseye]

most conservatives don't know it but even their masters admit climate change is man made. since Hannity doesn't repeat it over and over, most conservatives have missed it

It's no secret that human activity is changing the climate, and one new study shows how our influence is seriously affecting Earth's seasons and atmosphere.

Climate change strengthens Earth's 'heartbeat' - and that's bad news | Fox News


Its a secret to conservatives.

Remind me again - Who's Hannity?

 

[trixare4kids]

Remind me again - Who's Hannity?

Hannity is the guy the loony libs hate but waste their time watching. :lamo

 

[Bullseye]

Quick question: If, indeed, global warming/climate change is settled science with no possible chance of being disproved why are so many climate scientist still employed? If there's nothing that can possibly refute our current findings why are we wasting money paying these parasites? They need to get a real job.

 

[upsideguy]

:yawn: Your links don't impress me.
Use your own words for a change.

In other words, "..don't bother me with facts, I find the truth inconvenient" You obviously were so overwhelmed with my post that you failed to even read it. You will note all of my posts I make a personal point and then substantiate with 3rd party information. You, OTH, seem perfectly content with just espousing whatever is on your mind, be it right or wrong.

So, since you can't seem to read my post, I will make it crystal clear. My words were "It is settled science as much as anything is "settled". The links back up that statement.

I have yet to see you ever post 3rd party information to support the stuff you pull out of .....whereever. You do realize that in a real debate, once someone offers "expert opinion" to substantiate their claims, the other side pretty much has to offer up evidence to either continue with its line of reasoning or dispel the first party. You have done neither. In a real debate, you just lost.

 

[trixare4kids]

Typical response from a trump supporter.

Non sequitur.

Mocking those who chose to get an education and inform themselves. Guess you don’t have anything else, huh?

I am a rocket scientist.

 

[Bullseye]

Hannity is the guy the loony libs hate but waste their time watching. :lamo

Oh, I thought that was Limbaugh. . .,er Beck. . ..er O'Reilly. . ., er, the Koch Bros . . ., er Bannon. Dang, the left just has too many bogeymen to keep track.

 

[trixare4kids]

In other words, "..don't bother me with facts, I find the truth inconvenient"

My words was were "It is settled science as much as anything is "settled". The links back up that statement.

I have yet to see you ever post 3rd party information to support the stuff you pull out of .....where ever. You do realize that in a real debate, once someone offers "expert opinion" to substantiate their claims, the other side pretty much has to offer up evidence to either continue with its line of reasoning or dispel the first party. You have done neither. In a real debate, you just lost.

::seal claps::

So much for your debate skills...

 

[PoliSciXtina]

In other words, "..don't bother me with facts, I find the truth inconvenient" You obviously were so overwhelmed with my post that you failed to even read it. You will note all of my posts I make a personal point and then substantiate with 3rd party information. You, OTH, seem perfectly content with just espousing whatever is on your mind, be it right or wrong.

So, since you can't seem to read my post, I will make it crystal clear. My words were "It is settled science as much as anything is "settled". The links back up that statement.

I have yet to see you ever post 3rd party information to support the stuff you pull out of .....whereever. You do realize that in a real debate, once someone offers "expert opinion" to substantiate their claims, the other side pretty much has to offer up evidence to either continue with its line of reasoning or dispel the first party. You have done neither. In a real debate, you just lost.

The know they’ve lost. They just laugh and make jokes because they have nothing else. We know it. They know it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[PoliSciXtina]

:yawn: Your links don't impress me.
Use your own words for a change.

Why not? What’s wrong, you can’t be bothered to read? What are you doing here then, if you are just going to mock everyone who tries to teach you and provide you with evidence? You clearly have no argument except to make fun of those who chose to inform themselves and provide you with information. You’re not debating, you’re making a fool of yourself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trixare4kids]

Oh, I thought that was Limbaugh. . .,er Beck. . ..er O'Reilly. . ., er, the Koch Bros . . ., er Bannon. Dang, the left just has too many bogeymen to keep track.

The above aforementioned scary boogieman thank them for tuning in. Especially that clown Hannity, who if it were not for the left, wouldn't be worth 80 million. :lol:

 

[PoliSciXtina]

::seal claps::

So much for your debate skills...

And where are your debate skills?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trixare4kids]

Why not? What’s wrong, you can’t be bothered to read? What are you doing here then, if you are just going to mock everyone who tries to teach you and provide you with evidence? You clearly have no argument except to make fun of those who chose to inform themselves and provide you with information. You’re not debating, you’re making a fool of yourself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I haven't mocked you. I am waiting for the debate to begin. Telling me that you took two college courses in climate science proves what exactly?

 

[PoliSciXtina]

::seal claps::

So much for your debate skills...

If I posted links, would you read them? Or would I just be wasting my time? What would be good enough for you? Just wondering.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[trixare4kids]

And where are your debate skills?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If you have something you want to debate, begin....

 

[PoliSciXtina]

I haven't mocked you. I am waiting for the debate to begin. Telling me that you took two college courses in climate science proves what exactly?

Oy vey, I wasn’t trying to prove anything. Just making banter and conversation is all. I thought it was relevant to bring it up, shoot me. But you did proceed to mock me. Anyway, what would impress you? You’ve already decided that you will not read the links provided to you. So if I post any, I would assume I would be wasting my time. What do you want?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[PoliSciXtina]

If you have something you want to debate, begin....

I tried that. You’ve already come to the conclusion that climate change is not real. I would be happy to provide you with links to back up my claims. But I feel that would be wasting time. Others have tried to engage you and it wasn’t good enough, either. So what would make my argument any different? Climate change is real, humans are causing it, via the emission of fossil fuels, deforestation and other issues. I can sit here and continue to spout everything I have learned or I can provide you with actual links and resources so you can see that it’s not all hoopla. Based on your responses thus far, you just don’t seem interested in learning. So what do you truly want? Do you really want to learn or do you just want to sit and mock everyone who tries to provide you with info?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[DaveFagan]

The record low temperature in Australia is 17°F.

How do you explaun how the Southern Hemisphere has fewer people and less industry, but has always been warmer than the Northern Hemisphere?

The elliptical orbit of the Planet and the angle of the Earth's axis present the Southern hemisphere much closer to the Sun in their summer months. The Northern hemisphere is closer to the Sun in the Winter months, but the angle of the Earth's axis reflects more sunlight during Winter..

 

[Linc]

Oy vey, I wasn’t trying to prove anything. Just making banter and conversation is all. I thought it was relevant to bring it up, shoot me. But you did proceed to mock me. Anyway, what would impress you? You’ve already decided that you will not read the links provided to you. So if I post any, I would assume I would be wasting my time. What do you want?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The climate catastrophe being propagated on this Planet by Man will be irreversible, and won’t go over well with our Creator. Destroying Mother Nature is such a Manly thing to do. There’s no question in anyone’s mind that this should even be a point of contention. This is all hands on deck time bus.

We all know the PERMANENT catastrophes this admin is plotting and has already carried out, whether with destroying National Monuments, or letting the Canadians do it for us with their MEGA-Gold Mine in Alaska.

New and exciting changes using wood-cellulose products to replace plastic ones suffocating our Oceans is gaining tremendous ground in the intelligent free World. That would not include the USA.