I'll bet you drank more than a glass of whiskey.Well, predictions appear to look favorable for Clinton and marijuana legalization in MA. I'm about to head out for a proper Sichuan dinner and hopefully things will be clearer when I return.
The glasses of whiskey I've consumed thus far haven't helped on the point of clarity, however. I may end up working Sunday instead of tomorrow......
(I'm my own boss, so yeah....I can do that.)
Earlier I was listening to one of her & Bill's associates (Doug Schoen) and he predicted it right ... at least the part we can confirm.
He said she'd give a good public speech ... while in private recriminating against others for the loss.
The latter is her reputation.
I firmly believe some of these types listen to the We are the World Coke song every night before bed. It's a nice sentiment not rooted in reality.
It occurs to me that early on many people thought, I think I even said as much, that the Republican Party nominated the only candidate who couldn't beat Hillary Clinton.
Over the months, and confirmed yesterday, given what mattered to voters this election year it's clear that he was the only one who could have beaten Hillary Clinton.
I firmly believe some of these types listen to the We are the World Coke song every night before bed. It's a nice sentiment not rooted in reality.
I prefer "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing."
clinton and obama pushing for muslims who are the womens worst nightmare and takes both blacks and hispanic jobs helped to wake up a few in these groups to vote against clinton ....if they did not push for that the unwise voters would have elected clinton
... same as the Constitution is a Living Document crowd ... they're both strategic means to an end.
Is she crying?
It's Idiocracy, but for reals yo.
Sanders would've stood a far better chance. Sanders had a message that resonated with the rust belt voters. Hillary did not.
Robby Mook took a page of of political history that was "Donna Brazille's tales on how to lose an election" and did the same thing. Had Hillary sit back on her heals and instead of putting out a message to the people of why they should vote FOR her and opted to pretend like Trump would sink himself and just run commercials about how bad trump was.
... same as the Constitution is a Living Document crowd ... they're both strategic means to an end.
A living document...who thought that one up? The only living documents I know of are my bills. They show up every month, and they'll likely outlive me.
I prefer "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing."
Here it is from Wiki, and I should've known this.
The phrase originally derives from the title of a 1927 book of that name by Professor Howard Lee McBain,[2] while early efforts at developing the concept in modern form have been credited to figures including Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Louis D. Brandeis, and Woodrow Wilson.[3][4] The earliest mentions of the Constitution as "living", particularly in the context of a new way of interpreting it, comes out of Woodrow Wilson's book Constitutional Government in the United States [5] where he wrote:
Living political constitutions must be Darwinian in structure and in practice.[6]
Wilson strengthened this view, at least publicly, while he campaigned for President in 1912. He said:
Society is a living organism and must obey the laws of life, not of mechanics; it must develop. All that progressives ask or desire is permission - in an era when "development," "evolution," is the scientific word - to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that a nation is a living thing and not a machine.[7]
Here it is from Wiki, and I should've known this.
The phrase originally derives from the title of a 1927 book of that name by Professor Howard Lee McBain,[2] while early efforts at developing the concept in modern form have been credited to figures including Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Louis D. Brandeis, and Woodrow Wilson.[3][4] The earliest mentions of the Constitution as "living", particularly in the context of a new way of interpreting it, comes out of Woodrow Wilson's book Constitutional Government in the United States [5] where he wrote:
Living political constitutions must be Darwinian in structure and in practice.[6]
Wilson strengthened this view, at least publicly, while he campaigned for President in 1912. He said:
Society is a living organism and must obey the laws of life, not of mechanics; it must develop. All that progressives ask or desire is permission - in an era when "development," "evolution," is the scientific word - to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that a nation is a living thing and not a machine.[7]
yes indeed a nation MUST OBEY THE LAWS OF LIFE
and the LAWS of LIFE SCREAMS NO TO DEMOCRACY where 60 IQ voters equals 160 IQ voters
going against the founders on stopping the unwise was a giant CRIME done by the greed type foolers who wanted women to work for them and not for their babies and families.... this was a gigantic CRIME against the LAWS OF LIFE !!
Must be tough on people like you who find it harder to manipulate the rural population and fly over country than it is to manipulate people in the inner city. The political machine lost yesterday, good riddance
The Constitution is whatever the hell you want it to be. Words to live by.
How do you figure Hillary won the popular vote.
The last I saw Trump was ahead by 1M.
Did that change over night?
How do you figure Hillary won the popular vote.
The last I saw Trump was ahead by 1M.
Did that change over night?
ahh the Electoral Collage the founders put in place
Clinton had more Americans voting for her than voted for Trump. Sadly, an elitist mechanism left over from the 1700's at a time when the vast majority of Americans were not even allowed to vote is still in effect and for the second time in 16 years delivers us the loser of the popular vote as President.
Clinton had more Americans voting for her than voted for Trump. Sadly, an elitist mechanism left over from the 1700's at a time when the vast majority of Americans were not even allowed to vote is still in effect and for the second time in 16 years delivers us the loser of the popular vote as President.
yes indeed a nation MUST OBEY THE LAWS OF LIFE
and the LAWS of LIFE SCREAMS NO TO DEMOCRACY where 60 IQ voters equals 160 IQ voters
going against the founders on stopping the unwise was a giant CRIME done by the greed type foolers who wanted women to work for them and not for their babies and families.... this was a gigantic CRIME against the LAWS OF LIFE !!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?