- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
- Messages
- 2,693
- Reaction score
- 1,350
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
The NYT and its editorial views are representative of its local readership, like nearly every other newspaper.
Or perhaps readership for print media is falling in general?Hmm its readership is in decline, so democratic party identification must be, too...oh, look, it is !
Or perhaps readership for print media is falling in general?
Hmm its readership is in decline, so democratic party identification must be, too...oh, look, it is !
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
Find me a newspaper whose readership is NOT in decline.
I've never understood why it's so ingrained in the conservative psyche that everything is biased against them.
Find me a newspaper whose readership is NOT in decline.
I've never understood why it's so ingrained in the conservative psyche that everything is biased against them.
You're disputing my statement?Just drawing another false parallel.
Can someone correct me if I'm wrong but don't they usually make primary endorsements even for Republicans? I could have sworn they endorsed McCain for the GOP primary in 2008...
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?
Hmm its readership is in decline, so democratic party identification must be, too...oh, look, it is !
Of course, that is an illogical conclusion drawn from an almost axiomatic postulate: The readership of substantially all daily newspapers are in decline, regardless of who they endorse.
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
Um Wrong: They endorsed John Kasich recently as did every other newspaper across the country. But these are people who routinely look at policy and diplomacy and analzye it and not catchy slogans dumbed down for people who probably don't read newspapers much.
The New York Times endorses Clinton, Kasich - POLITICO
Well yeah, they (and the New York Daily) are a central part of the NY political machine. So of course they'll only endorse Democrats. That'd be like expecting Fox News to endorse Hillary Clinton.
Ok before you go into your low information voter spiel, I think he meant the general. I mean, unless you think they are going to endorse Clinton in the Republican primary. The General election is where an endorsement counts, not the primaries.
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?:doh
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html?_r=0
Find me a newspaper whose readership is NOT in decline.
I've never understood why it's so ingrained in the conservative psyche that everything is biased against them.
It's been 60 years since the NYT endorsed a Republican presidential candidate. They have only endorsed 3 different republicans in the past 104 years.
Biased media? Naaah, what would possibly cause anyone to think that?
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/10/28/opinion/presidential-endorsement-timeline.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?