Just to be clear, the ice buildup in the Antarctic is not nearly as great as the icecap loss in the northern pole. That said, these are simply changes that the earth goes through since it's existence.
That's False.I'd agree with that.
This is one of the many things that makes me pretty sure that the CO2 is driving the climate notion is wrong. If CO2 was the cause of the warming, the warming would be nicely distributed as is the CO2.
The warming is much more centered on the Northern Hemisphere while the Southern Hemisphere is comparatively cooling....
There Is some interesting data that suggest CO2 is a trailing as much as a leading indicator IMO. Fellow greenhouse gas Methane could turn out to be just as important or more so in warming.CO2 is a very homogenized gas and the very slight variations globally result from the local temperatures. Again, CO2 concentration results from temperature. CO2 does not drive temperature. If CO2 was really the driving force of climate, the hemispheric effect would not be so distinctly different.
We'll see, but it hardly matters either way. The damage is done, and the species, along with multitudes of others, is on the way out.It just just weather, not climate.
Hmmm...
Just when we are being told that the world is ending because all of the ice of the world is melting and the coasts of all of the land on the planet will soon be submerged under the melted ice waters, we are told that the ice Extent in the Antarctic is at the all time record high ever recorded.
Once again, the real world is proven to be wrong by the models of the AGW Scientists. It could, I suppose, be the other way around.
Mother Nature must not be an AGW Scientist. I guess if she was, she'd be Doctor Nature.
Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
That's False.
Due to Air currents/weather etc, one would NOT expect warming to be even.
(ie. Ice areas could melt and Could cause decades of colder than avg winter in temperate zones like Northern Europe. Some scientists have postulated the Gulf Stream may be deflected/slowed by cold melt water)
It's AVERAGE temperature that has been rising and AVERAGE Ice volume that has been decreasing.
You oft post is Fallacious deduction or Fallacious request for overly specific 'proof'.
There Is some interesting data that suggest CO2 is a trailing as much as a leading indicator IMO. Fellow greenhouse gas Methane could turn out to be just as important or more so in warming.
The glaciers in Glacier National Park in Alaska started melting in the 1700's. Jus' sayin'.
The glaciers in Glacier National Park in Alaska started melting in the 1700's. Jus' sayin'.
Help me to understand this.
If we accept that CO2 warms some areas differently than it warms other areas, what does this mean about CO2 and its Green House Forcing strength?
Does CO2 behave differently as a GHG at different latitudes or is it just not that powerful in the first place and is routinely overpowered by any other forcing present?
Every Right Winger gets their Own Antarctic Ice growing/Record string,
There simply is no coherence in the section, No sanity. It's Partsian SPAMaganda.
Thanks for the weak and belated attempt to redirect after the fact.. But really, you didn't address anything that was said, all you did was post a thinly veiled flame against republicans.. Which puts your claim of it being partisan in real perspective.. Careful your partisanship is showing..
Ahem. From your own link. 6th lowest year on record, clear downward trend, for the Arctic.Just when we are being told that the world is ending because all of the ice of the world is melting and the coasts of all of the land on the planet will soon be submerged under the melted ice waters, we are told that the ice Extent in the Antarctic is at the all time record high ever recorded.
Once again, climate change deniers cherry-pick the stats they like, and ignore or trash those same sources as soon as they provide data they don't like.Once again, the real world is proven to be wrong by the models of the AGW Scientists.
What about if I point out for the 93rd time that area and volume aren't the same thing?
Ahem. From your own link. 6th lowest year on record, clear downward trend, for the Arctic.
Much of the ice is only a year old (as one might expect), which is thinner and less dense than multi-year ice (as one should also expect). I.e. ice volume, which is more important than area, is also still below earlier averages.
Once again, climate change deniers cherry-pick the stats they like, and ignore or trash those same sources as soon as they provide data they don't like.
Please do, and then I can point out that ice thickness, especially over land has more to do with precipitation than temperature and especially water temperature which it isn't resting on in Antarctica... And that would be about 93rd time I made the point.. And thanks for staying on topic, at least..
Yes, ice is not a direct measurement of temperature trends, especially on a short time frame. But I never claimed it was the best way to measure temperature...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?