2 more people corroborate Tara Reade's allegations against Biden; AP buries story

[Trypt]

Just looking at Ford you knew that she was either bat **** crazy or coached to lie, knowing she was protected, knowing there is nothing that can happen to her no matter what the outcome, except a million dollar payday. This is not the case with this new chick as she knows that as soon as she went after a Democrat, no matter that she is a Democrat, all protection by the state and media and celebrity is over. Repubs are weak this way, they want actual physical evidence, Dems are lucky that their opposition plays by some utopian Christian ideal rules, cuz if they played by the Dems rules, most of them would have been shot for treason years ago. The standard of proof is very different for the left than the right, so she won't be "believed" unless there are 10 smoking guns all going off in unison, whereas Ford's "I don't know where, when, why, what or even ****ing who" story was twisted as factual every which way by the sleazy media, with no evidence at all, not even a corroboration. Tara can have 20 chicks coming out corroborating the story and it won't matter, probably even a video showing Biden assaulting women won't do it. Oh wait, of course that doesn't do it, even after dozens of videos and pictures showing Biden doing just that. Biden is just Biden, they say.

These days it's easy to figure out guilt. If the Dems are accusing someone of something, you know damn well they are guilty of doing that very thing, to a far worse degree.

 

[veritas1]

So she went around bragging to people after the alleged incident?

So what?

There's zero proof.

So much for the "believe all women" bulls**t. The difference between this and the Kavanaugh fairy tale is that Reade told at least three other people of the assault at the time. She also worked for Biden. That is not in dispute. Kavanuagh didn't know Blasey-Ford from Martha Washington and none of her supposed witnesses backed her up. Yet, which case did the left blubber about on TV as if it was an open and shut case? The one with NO evidence of course.

 

[veritas1]

Just looking at Ford you knew that she was either bat **** crazy or coached to lie, knowing she was protected, knowing there is nothing that can happen to her no matter what the outcome, except a million dollar payday. This is not the case with this new chick as she knows that as soon as she went after a Democrat, no matter that she is a Democrat, all protection by the state and media and celebrity is over. Repubs are weak this way, they want actual physical evidence, Dems are lucky that their opposition plays by some utopian Christian ideal rules, cuz if they played by the Dems rules, most of them would have been shot for treason years ago. The standard of proof is very different for the left than the right, so she won't be "believed" unless there are 10 smoking guns all going off in unison, whereas Ford's "I don't know where, when, why, what or even ****ing who" story was twisted as factual every which way by the sleazy media, with no evidence at all, not even a corroboration. Tara can have 20 chicks coming out corroborating the story and it won't matter, probably even a video showing Biden assaulting women won't do it. Oh wait, of course that doesn't do it, even after dozens of videos and pictures showing Biden doing just that. Biden is just Biden, they say.

These days it's easy to figure out guilt. If the Dems are accusing someone of something, you know damn well they are guilty of doing that very thing, to a far worse degree.

It was both. She's a headcase and was coached. In fact, that made the coaching all the more necessary.

 

[Sand Castle]

It was both. She's a headcase and was coached. In fact, that made the coaching all the more necessary.

Although Kavanaugh v. Ford is interesting, focus should be centered on Biden versus Trump when it comes to allegations. After- all Biden and trump are competing for the job of President. Kavanaugh, old news.

The ongoing case below would be a better comparison to Biden:

Trump asks New York judge to dismiss rape allegation case

President Trump asked a New York judge to dismiss an allegation from a woman who claimed he raped her in a department store dressing room 20 years ago.

Trump’s lawyer said in a court filing Friday that E. Jean Carroll, an advice columnist, cannot sue the president in New York because the statements at issue were made in Washington.

Trump denies Carroll’s claims and said New York courts lack personal jurisdiction over him “even when the purported statements were published to New York readers/listeners, or were directed towards or caused harm to a New York citizen.”

 

[Moderate Right]

That wasn't an answer to the question. If you don't believe the accusation against Biden has merit then that's the end of the discussion (at least as far as your involvement in this discussion is concerned).

I am pointing out the hypocrisy. I believed Kavanaugh and I believe Biden. But many on the left are full of hypocrisy for making them partisanly different when they were not. This is and should never have been about who you believe and who you don't. This is America. You are innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. The left believed Ford because she was attacking someone from the right. They believe Biden because he is on the left. It isn't about what we believe. There is more evidence against Biden than there was against Kavanaugh, therefore the left should be attacking Biden even more than they attacked Kavanaugh but they are sweeping it under the rug. What anyone believes is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is proof, not what anyone believes.

 

[Cardinal]

I am pointing out the hypocrisy.

Stop using such big words as if you have any idea what they mean.

 

[Fletch]

You believe Biden, and support a guy that sexually assaulted 25 women and regularly walked in on underage girls' dressing rooms, so you can probably imagine what anybody thinks about your credibility.

Do I care what people without credibility think of my credibility? No.

 

[Fletch]

Although Kavanaugh v. Ford is interesting, focus should be centered on Biden versus Trump when it comes to allegations.

No, the comparison should be Kavenaugh because that is where the standard for dealing with these types of allegations were established--by you guys.

 

[vegas giants]

No, the comparison should be Kavenaugh because that is where the standard for dealing with these types of allegations were established--by you guys.

E Jean Carroll was VIOLENTLY raped by trump

 

[Fletch]

E Jean Carroll was VIOLENTLY raped by trump

Sure.

 

[vegas giants]

Sure.

And not a mention on the news



Gop hypocrisy!!!!!!!! Lol

 

[Sand Castle]

No, the comparison should be Kavenaugh because that is where the standard for dealing with these types of allegations were established--by you guys.

Exactly, the standard must be applied to trump. As you said; established, and already applied to Kavanaugh, case closed.

 

[ajn678]

I didn't believe Kavanaugh was guilty. I don't believe Biden is either. If people are so sure Biden did the crime. Take him to court now. But that won't happen.

Innocent till proven guilty.

I agree

 

[Moderate Right]

Stop using such big words as if you have any idea what they mean.

I know what they mean and so do you but your definition is, if the other side are hypocrites then that opens the door for you to be hypocrites too.

 

[ludin]

So she went around bragging to people after the alleged incident?

So what?

There's zero proof.

not what you guys were ranting about during Kavanaugh accusation.
Wow now she is bragging about being sexuallly assaulted to people?

you people can't get any lower.

LOL you people were howling over Kavanaugh even though 0 of Ford's witnesses knew what she was talking about.
So let me ask you this was Ford credible or not?

if you say yes then you should find Reade's complain equally credible.

Let's see how consistent you are in your argument.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Shouldn't we all wait until her final version of this story comes out? It seems to change quite a bit.

 

[code1211]

Which one of Reade's numerous ever changing stories were cooberated?

With as much respect as possible, this was an incident that apparently caused her to be stripped of her supervisory duties and subsequently fired.

Those things ARE matters of record.

What caused the demotion and then the termination are poorly researched by our "reporters" working the story.

This poor level of research is also a matter of record. Otherwise, we would know all of the details.

 

[vegas giants]

With as much respect as possible, this was an incident that apparently caused her to be stripped of her supervisory duties and subsequently fired.

Those things ARE matters of record.

What caused the demotion and then the termination are poorly researched by our "reporters" working the story.

This poor level of research is also a matter of record. Otherwise, we would know all of the details.

I guess fox news has no good reporters

 

[Sand Castle]

not what you guys were ranting about during Kavanaugh accusation.
Wow now she is bragging about being sexuallly assaulted to people?

you people can't get any lower.

LOL you people were howling over Kavanaugh even though 0 of Ford's witnesses knew what she was talking about.
So let me ask you this was Ford credible or not?

if you say yes then you should find Reade's complain equally credible.

Let's see how consistent you are in your argument.

And you people were howling against Ford

 

[Sand Castle]

With as much respect as possible, this was an incident that apparently caused her to be stripped of her supervisory duties and subsequently fired.

Those things ARE matters of record.

What caused the demotion and then the termination are poorly researched by our "reporters" working the story.

This poor level of research is also a matter of record. Otherwise, we would know all of the details.

Have you ever heard the term dead ends. Reades lies and changing story has directed journalist to dead ends.

The media is a for profit business, they need real stories to make money. They have become tired of going down Reades rabbit hole.

A good Republican must be sympathetic to well, that's business

 

[Cardinal]

I know what they mean and so do you but your definition is, if the other side are hypocrites then that opens the door for you to be hypocrites too.

Again, you keep using “hypocrite” as if you know what it means. You don’t.

 

[Mr Person]

Publishing something is not "burying" it. Definitions matter.

 

[Trypt]

The only morons that think Trump ever had to lay a hand on a woman against her will are exactly the type that say things like "believe all women" but then get silent and claim Trump rape when Biden **** comes up. It's embarrassing.

If I believed for a second that Trump ever did anything on the level of that lowlife rapist Biden, I'd drop him in a second. All it takes is a few moments of reading the allegations to know exactly wtf is going on.

Although I'd be willing to accept the "he told me I'd win the modelling competition so then we did it on his couch, but he never came through, so now I'm calling rape" ridiculousness, that happens with celebrities all the time, or with anyone with power, and throughout history. Both sexes are seriously guilty of "lies" to the other to get what they want, it's human nature.

 

[Da Mole]

So she went around bragging to people after the alleged incident?

So what?

There's zero proof.

Did you hold the same position with Kavanaugh's accuser? Or were you with the same crowd that said all women MUST be believed. Guilty until proven innocent.

 

[Sand Castle]

The only morons that think Trump ever had to lay a hand on a woman against her will

Actually, Biden was a dashing young man accomplished, polite and caring. How could any moron think Biden had to lay a hand on a woman against her will?