- Joined
- Oct 20, 2006
- Messages
- 2,450
- Reaction score
- 1,245
- Location
- New Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Does anybody actually think that the truth movement will EVER get it's **** together and form a cohesive working theory on what actually happened?
Like every year around this time, TLC has been playing their 9/11 documentaries all evening, and while sitting here watching and remembering the horror of that day, it just amazes me that the "truth movement" is still so all over the place after this long. You have no planers, thermite hoax believers, tactical nuke believers, directed space beam believers, LIHOPers, and pretty much every single combo of 2 or more of those.
Does anybody actually think that the truth movement will EVER get it's **** together and form a cohesive working theory on what actually happened? Or are we forever destined to be blessed with "wah I don't know what happened, but the official story is a lie!"?
Does anybody actually think that the truth movement will EVER get it's **** together and form a cohesive working theory on what actually happened? Or are we forever destined to be blessed with "wah I don't know what happened, but the official story is a lie!"?
I really don't see how there's any room for error when it comes to the physical cause for the towers collapsing. I'd almost entertain theories about who was "really" flying the planes, but not very strongly.
So where is the experiment demonstrating the "theory" that the top 15% of a skyscraper can fall and destroy the rest which was strong enough to support it?
~snip~
But there is no dispute about the physics.
9/11 is a scientific farce.
psik
Just as I can balance a bowling ball on my head with little practice or danger, should I let someone drop a 20lb bowling ball on my head?
12 years later, the deluded still are.
Despite all the knowledge that has been gained in those 12 years, some americans (a minority perhaps) still believe Colin Powell et al. Sad comment, but true fact.
I'm wondering if they also believe John Kerry and Barack Obama about all this sarin gas business? Probably. :3oops:
In the bowling ball/head analogy, we're just trying to bread the neck, not crush any skulls. If you take a paving stone and drop it on another, they tend to break, so the issue of the floor-slabs shattering is fairly sound. If I drop 15 paving stones, even if they're already broken, on another, it'll break too.Unfortunately you only have one head.
If you stacked 90 skulls and dropped the bowling ball on top how many skulls would be crushed?
I already modelled this:
WTC Modeling Instruction & Testing in the Real World - YouTube
The point is that the dropped mass cannot destroy the entire series. Energy is used up crushing the top of the stack and the mass stops. So how could the entire north tower be destroyed?
The people who believe that have accepted INSANE physics. But after 12 years they would look really stupid admitting it. So they need to say that models are irrelevant. But physics will never change or go away.
psik
In the bowling ball/head analogy, we're just trying to bread the neck, not crush any skulls. If you take a paving stone and drop it on another, they tend to break, so the issue of the floor-slabs shattering is fairly sound. If I drop 15 paving stones, even if they're already broken, on another, it'll break too.
Like every year around this time, TLC has been playing their 9/11 documentaries all evening, and while sitting here watching and remembering the horror of that day, it just amazes me that the "truth movement" is still so all over the place after this long. You have no planers, thermite hoax believers, tactical nuke believers, directed space beam believers, LIHOPers, and pretty much every single combo of 2 or more of those.
Does anybody actually think that the truth movement will EVER get it's **** together and form a cohesive working theory on what actually happened? Or are we forever destined to be blessed with "wah I don't know what happened, but the official story is a lie!"?
Despite all the knowledge that has been gained in those 12 years, some americans (a minority perhaps) still believe Colin Powell et al.
So they need to say that models are irrelevant.
...and the bowling ball would be slowed down at each one and run out of energy.
We don't say that ALL models are irrelevant. We say that YOUR models are irrelevant. You (for some reason) just can't see how silly and unrelated to the problem they actually are.
mods: ban me I won't be back!
So where have you been insisting that some engineering school make a model that can completely collapse?
To all real posters: I've found a real forum where you debate with adults. Where shills and morons that get proven wrong time and again and don't admit it, are not tolerated. Here is what the moderator there told me: "We try very hard to avoid the DP experience here, and so far so good." . I've wasted 2 years on this forum, I've identified people who've exposed themselves as shills by responding to valid points I've made (including source links) with taunts and no rebuttal, time and time again, and DP refuses to do anything about them. Politicalfray.com
Shills/idiots: go ahead and play stupid over there and see how long you last ignoring evidence and poisoning the forums with your bs.
mods: ban me I won't be back!
and why didn't you state what site that is? I smell a conspiracy:mrgreen:
Oh I'm sorry, I haven't. I don't need a miniature working model to understand the chaotic nature of those collapses. You want the model, YOU go build it. I will however criticize things that I find severely lacking in relevancy.
for myself. No I don't believe JK or BO on the Syria other than gas was used.
Funny you make such broad wondering questions about people. It probably fits you to a tee. Never met a CT you didn't like.:lamo
She did. It's just hidden amongst her raving babbling psycho rant so it's hard to pick up on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?