Thats fair enough if you believe that the potential carbon neutrality of our species will have any consequence whatsoever to our temperatures (statistically and empirically I don't see any evidence of how it can) otherwise its just another expensive anal gazing exercise.
The exercise is necessary if we are to move to a sustainable future where everyone alive can enjoy a first world lifestyle, should they choose to.Thats fair enough if you believe that the potential carbon neutrality of our species will have any consequence whatsoever to our temperatures (statistically and empirically I don't see any evidence of how it can) otherwise its just another expensive anal gazing exercise.
The carbon exchange is when the fuel is made, CO2 is harvested from the atmosphere, so when the fuel is burned, the net emission is zero!
What I am saying is that the sun is a huge fusion reactor and almost all the energy ever available on earth came from it, (except nuclear). I would think improving the direct access to its energy would be the best place for our investment. We have been using the suns energy stored in carbon for our civilization but that is becoming a problem.
How is the energy produced that is used to harvest the CO2? This seems like a perpetual motion machine.
No, energy output is less than energy input.
I still don't understand how we can use energy from carbon based fuels to remove carbon from the atmosphere and still have enough energy left to store and use to do work like power cars or households. If you are talking about a fazing out of carbon fuels then yes I understand that.
Wind and solar power.
OK. This is usually not made plain. This is a short term way to mitigate carbon release by exchanging it with carbon neutral energy production. Of course it means that we can only reduce the increase in carbon by increasing carbon neutral energy production. And we can only reduce total carbon in the atmosphere by being totally carbon neutral and having enough excess energy to actively remove carbon. Do you agree?
Quite frankly, I don't care if we increase CO2 in the air or not. I was just trying to explain the concept. This idea would at least reduce the CO2 we put in the atmosphere.
I think soon millions and eventually a billion electric car batteries will be able to store energy while parked at work or at home, (perhaps even in shopping parking lots). This energy will be stored and tapped to distribute our electric grid locally and allow efficient on-demand delivery of energy. That infrastructure is being planned and implemented now. Energy production will require fossil fuel generation support until we increase carbon free generation to supplant it. But in the meantime carbon fuel power generation will be localized and can be scrubbed and millions of cars will not be spewing exhausts everywhere.
Electric cars will soon be half the price of gas powered cars and will be superior in everyway. That will be a significant boost to the economy and raise the standard of living.
But it took more than twelve years for them to go extinct.
Then you don't believe a meteor strike ended the dinosaurs?But it took more than twelve years for them to go extinct.
www.newscientist.com
All the major automobile manufactures do not agree. Please cite any recent information from them that disputes that.Nonsense. The huge environmental impact of their manufacture make them eco tokenism for the few trendy virtue signalling westerners that can afford them nothing more
Yes. The sun generates all the energy we will ever need. We just have to develop the tech. to capture more of it.
His American news outlets are denying it. Murdoch is a flagrant liar so i wouldnt count on his support.The need for action on climate change isn't a partisan issue. That the evidence are so overwhelming that even Rupert Murdoch's Australian news outlets have to support net zero emission target.
Rupert Murdoch's Australian news outlets plan to dial back climate change denial and promote net zero emissions by 2050, according to reports
Public outrage mounted on social media against Murdoch's news outlets as wildfires ravaged wide swaths of Australia in 2019 and 2020.www.businessinsider.com
