People scoffed when Bush said Iraq was bypassing UN inspectors by moving WMDs to Syria...
UN inspectors should be getting back with their findings soon.
People scoffed when Bush said Iraq was bypassing UN inspectors by moving WMDs to Syria...
Syria has long had chemical weapons. Its possession predated the Iraq war.
Gee, we found mass graves of several thousands of dead Iraqis killed by Saddam Hussein, and that was unjustified. Now we have the same scenario, and Kerry and Pelosi want to act?
While we diddled with the UN for months on end about Iraq, did Saddam not have plenty of time to move his weapons into Syria?
Then why weren't we invading Damascus in the 90s?
And don't use the word "oil".
Then why weren't we invading Damascus in the 90s?
And don't use the word "oil".
My issue with this is simple.
The rebels want the west to get involved.
The only way that is going to happen is if Assad uses chemical weapons.
Assad does not want the west to get involved.
The only way that is going to happen is if he uses Chemical Weapons.
Who has more to gain from their use here?
That question should lead us to be extremely cautious.
While I hate Assads guts and hope he gets Gaddafi'd... I also don't want to support terrorists and it seems that's exactly what a fair number of these Rebels in Syria are.
Because Clinton was president in the 1990s and wasn't an idiotic boob like Bush.
Syria posed no imminent threat to critical American interests and allies.
People scoffed when Bush said Iraq was bypassing UN inspectors by moving WMDs to Syria...
and I wouldn't put it past them to use biological weapons against themselves (or civilians associated with other militias) just to blame Assad.
Yeah, I'd expect that kind of answer from you..
Syria posed no imminent threat to critical American interests and allies.
Well it's the embodiment of the phrase
"The Ends Justify The Means"
If you believe killing a neighbourhood of people with chemical weapons will ensure final victory for your side... there are those who see it as justifiable.
In that case... its not unreasonable to speculate that a chemical weapons shell may have been stolen and fired from a rebel position.
There is no way we will be effective as to the outcome of this by blowing up a few airports. We need to stay the hell out. Kudos to Parliament for keeping the UK out of Obama's Folly.
Then why weren't we invading Damascus in the 90s?
And don't use the word "oil".
It was ridiculous for Bush jr. to use them as an excuse. There is no hypocrisy in Kerry's position. Kerry, although wrong, is basing his decisions from current and relevant events.
And they are now?
Do they now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?