- Joined
- Oct 30, 2021
- Messages
- 36,467
- Reaction score
- 38,945
- Location
- DCA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Why 1100? They should have limited the group to 666 members, symbolism and all.
What he was really saying was climate change will be GREAT for the planet..... right?I see.
You are just lying about it. OK.
Numeric symbolism.Why 1100? They should have limited the group to 666 members, symbolism and all.
I want you to show everyone "his exact words." Not your interpretation or someone else's, which is likely wrong.What he was really saying was climate change will be GREAT for the planet..... right?
Hahahahaha
Numeric symbolism.
Are you a numerologist by chance?
I posted his exact wordsI want you to show everyone "his exact words." Not your interpretation or someone else's, which is likely wrong.
Try putting his interview in full context.
I'm not kidding. I simply interpret the words differently, therefore I don't know what sentence he makes that you are speaking of.I posted his exact words
My god are you kidding?
OK tell me your interpretation of thisI'm not kidding. I simply interpret the words differently, therefore I don't know what sentence he makes that you are speaking of.
You either have something or you don't. It appears you know you don't, becase you are scared to show me the sentence you refer to.
You didn't link it. That sounds like a lie, or paraphrased. I seriously doubt he said those exact words unless it was a what-if question posed to him.OK tell me your interpretation of this
Imagine a giant asteroid on a direct collision course with Earth. That is the equivalent of what we face now with climate change, yet we dither.
James Hansen
Wanna bet?You didn't link it. That sounds like a lie, or paraphrased. I seriously doubt he said those exact words unless it was a what-if question posed to him.
Link please. I thought you were referring to text in the like provided earlier.
OK, what is the link?Wanna bet?
It's a ted talk.OK, what is the link?
So? I don't watch them.It's a ted talk.
Another nothing-burger from you. Activist web site. That quote is above the title, with no context around it.You should be embarrassed
![]()
Climate Change Collision Course. {James Hansen on TED Video} | elephant journal
James Hansen speaks from a studied point of view, sharing what he's learned about climate change and why it scares him to think of the future his grandchildren, the monarch butterfly and something 'worse than the dust bowl'.www.elephantjournal.com
Was he? If that's your claim.......prove itSo? I don't watch them.
Another nothing-burger from you. Activist web site. That quote is above the title, with no context around it.
Don't you understand that a no context quote is meaningless?
Again, he could have been replying to a "what if" question, of which we aren't told the values of the variables.
You do not question the word of the climate change proponents. That is blasphemy of the highest order.Of course like the Doctors who questioned the Covid response, these 1.110 saps who followed the science (being scientist and all) and have concluded the is no Emergency.
=========================
![]()
Over 1,100 scientists, including one Nobel laureate — Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giaever — have signed a declaration stating that “there is no climate emergency.” The declaration was signed in late June and is already causing a fuss within the climate hysteria community.
Among other things, the signatories declare that climate science, as it currently stands, has become far too politicized to take seriously and that climate change as currently posited is not an existential threat to humanity.
“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declarationstates. “Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”
The declaration clearly states that whatever climate change we may be seeing on Earth is driven by natural factors at least as much as by man-made factors.
“The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases,” the signatories declare. “The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.”
Signatories from nations as diverse as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, The Netherlands, France, and Indonesia have signed the document.
Among America’s signatories are Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheres, oceans, and climate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dr. William Happer, professor emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University; and Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist.
![]()
1,100 Scientists Proclaim "There Is No Climate Emergency"
Over 1,100 scientists, including one Nobel laureate — Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giaever — have signed a declaration stating that “there is no climate emergency.” The declaration was signed in late June and is already causing a fuss within the climate hysteria community.Among other...thenewamerican.com
Run alongSo? I don't watch them.
Another nothing-burger from you. Activist web site. That quote is above the title, with no context around it.
Don't you understand that a no context quote is meaningless?
Again, he could have been replying to a "what if" question, of which we aren't told the values of the variables.
Yeah yeah you know attention to that man behind the curtain.This was started Thursday:
Over 1,000 scientists sign declaration that there is no climate emergency
Over 1,000 scientists sign declaration that there is no climate emergency
Source: https://clintel.org/ And a PDF copy of the document: https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/WCD-version-06272215121.pdf Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling...debatepolitics.com
Why are you repeating the very same thread? Please pay better attention next time. The “declaration” has been thoroughly dismissed as a total fraud. Read the thread listed above instead of wasting our time.
Got any evidence?Yeah yeah you know attention to that man behind the curtain.
Yet another thing to be ignored by the 'Climate Change Doom' cult.Of course like the Doctors who questioned the Covid response, these 1.110 saps who followed the science (being scientist and all) and have concluded the is no Emergency.
=========================
![]()
Over 1,100 scientists, including one Nobel laureate — Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giaever — have signed a declaration stating that “there is no climate emergency.” The declaration was signed in late June and is already causing a fuss within the climate hysteria community.
Among other things, the signatories declare that climate science, as it currently stands, has become far too politicized to take seriously and that climate change as currently posited is not an existential threat to humanity.
“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declarationstates. “Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.”
The declaration clearly states that whatever climate change we may be seeing on Earth is driven by natural factors at least as much as by man-made factors.
“The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases,” the signatories declare. “The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.”
Signatories from nations as diverse as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, The Netherlands, France, and Indonesia have signed the document.
Among America’s signatories are Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheres, oceans, and climate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Dr. William Happer, professor emeritus in the Department of Physics at Princeton University; and Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist.
![]()
1,100 Scientists Proclaim "There Is No Climate Emergency"
Over 1,100 scientists, including one Nobel laureate — Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giaever — have signed a declaration stating that “there is no climate emergency.” The declaration was signed in late June and is already causing a fuss within the climate hysteria community.Among other...thenewamerican.com
It's a conspiracy!!!!!!!!! LolYet another thing to be ignored by the 'Climate Change Doom' cult.
Having been around awhile I recall after a couple of severe winters, there was an endless wailing of 'The Next Ice Age'. Still waiting for it.1. I believe there is already a similar thread posted by P.O.S. on 08/25/22.
2. Even so, the thread is reporting the title of the "New American" article being cited. So, there was no "lie," just a citation.
3. Meanwhile I have experienced a number of "predictions" by climate alarmists over the last 60+ years, all of the most famously extreme assertions were absolutely wrong.
I think I will give some credence to this particular group of experts in "various" fields, because despite billions of years of "climate changes" Earth abides. As well as has humanity over the few million years of our evolutionary roots and development.
I did a text search for "meteor" and it wasn't there.
At least in the religion of those 'climate change proponents'.You do not question the word of the climate change proponents. That is blasphemy of the highest order.
And you do not call other people prophets I mean scientists in this religion I mean science who questioned the Lord I mean the narrative I mean the science.
Imagine me scaling it you like Greta thunberg and say how dare you.
![]()
Who said meteor?I did a text search for "meteor" and it wasn't there.
Stop playing games please.
You're right on that. Asteroid. Maybe you should stop being so lazy and quote what you want a person to see?Who said meteor?
Do you not even know enough that you got the word wrong?
Hahahahaha