- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
During committee testimony this week in Austin, a Texas senator interrupted a Spanish speaker and telling him he should "be speaking in English" during a committee hearing.
Antolin Aguirre of the Austin Immigrant Rights Coalition was testifying against Senate Bill 9 that would help crack down on illegal immigrants in Texas. Aguirre spoke through an interpreter even though he had been in the U.S. since 1988.
Two minutes into Antolin Aguirre’s testimony, Sen. Chris Harris, a Republican from Arlington, interrupted asking Aguirre’s interrupter, "Did I understand him correctly that he has been here since 1988?" Harris asked. "Why aren’t you speaking in English then?"
Read more: “Why Aren’t You Speaking English?” | Houston News - KTRH NewsRadio 740 Houston News, Weather, Traffic
Being completely incapable of learning a second language myself, I can sympathize with the gentleman, assuming he has the same issue. Even if he doesn't, he may have been concerned that poor mastery or a thick accent might distract from what he was trying to explain to the committee.
On a separate note, there is nothing wrong with this bill. The idea that it violates the "rights" if an illegal alien or leads to profiling are ridiculous. Citizenship status is checked in relation to being arrested in the commission of a crime, or in suspicion of having committed a crime.
The guy speaks English, you hear him in the video, he's a immigrant rights activist trying to show he'll make a stand. The Senator was spot on.
The senator is a douche. We don't have an official language in the United States, he can speak in whatever language he wants and he feels more comfortable speaking in Spanish, then whatever. People need to stop getting "insulted" when others speak another language.
The senator is a douche. We don't have an official language in the United States, he can speak in whatever language he wants and he feels more comfortable speaking in Spanish, then whatever. People need to stop getting "insulted" when others speak another language.
Great. Again, we don't have an official language here, he can speak whatever language he wants.A, knee jerk liberalism at it's finest! Thank you TPD! The Senator wasn't upset the gentleman was speaking spanish, he was upset he's been here 23 years, is before the committee as an immigrant rights supporter, speaking spanish. You might not get that fine distinction, but most of us I believe, DO.
We don't have a language of "this country".What a load of BS.
This was a formal hearing, and the language of this country and the people in that room is English. How are these state senators supposed to address his issues if he won't communicate in their language?
Didn't he bring his own translator? I don't see your point.Do we need to have 150 translators in the room in case someone comes in speaking some 4th dialect of a Tanzanian tribe?
Great. Again, we don't have an official language here, he can speak whatever language he wants.
Great. Again, we don't have an official language here, he can speak whatever language he wants.
Great. Again, we don't have an official language here, he can speak whatever language he wants.
He can speak the language, so your comment doesn't apply. Again, we don't have an official language.In a senate hearing?
If you've been in a country 23 years, and you can't speak the language, you're dumb as a bag of hammers and have no business addressing a state senate.
Great. Again, we don't have an official language here, he can speak whatever language he wants.
He can speak the language, so your comment doesn't apply. Again, we don't have an official language.
I agree that he would more likely be taken seriously (by certain people) by speaking English. However, it's really dumb to be "insulted" as the senator was by someone speaking Spanish.when the bulk of the people speak a certain language, if you want to be taken seriously you should speak their language. sure, he could speak Klingon if he wanted to.
I agree that he would more likely be taken seriously (by certain people) by speaking English. However, it's really dumb to be "insulted" as the senator was by someone speaking Spanish.
I agree with everything you said. Nonetheless, I think it's ridiculous to be "insulted" as the senator claimed to be in the video and I also think it's ridiculous to applaud the senator for being insulted as Mr. V. did. There are obviously many practical reasons to speak English instead of Spanish and yet it's also understandable to me why someone would want to speak Spanish in such a hearing as a statement. To me, it's just arrogant and silly to be insulted by something that isn't insulting.Apparently, his choice of Spanish and the use of an interpretter were a stunt to promote the "rights" of illegal immigrants, not a legitimate need for aid in communication. Your right, of course. He CAN speak any language he wants. But something most people learn very quickly when taking a second language is that you lose a LOT of the original intent in translation. You can even see this online when you translate a Spanish statement to English and then back to Spanish. 9 times out of 10 you won't get the same thing you started with.
We don't have an official language, but we definitely have an overwhelmingly common one. Learning the intricacies of any language BUT English is usually only provided two years of academic focus in most states, so it's safe to say that English is the understood language of the country. If you want to assimilate into our culture and be successful then you need to know enough English to communicate your needs and inquiries. Unless you're able to afford a translator to follow you around (or willing to use your young children as your personal translator) you won't be able to communicate here without learning some of the language.
Will that change in the future? With many states now inititating Spanish-language learning in Pre-K it's very probable that over the next 15-20 years we'll see a more bilingual society. At the moment, it's still essential for a successful Hispanic immigrant to learn at least the basic tennants of English (I'd say enough to communicate with health professionals, police, and understand traffic signs).
The point of it isn't my concern, it's the idea that people are insulted by the "stunt" - it's so ****ing stupid. There's nothing insulting about it.so, other than a stupid stunt...what was the point of this guy speaking spanish to the english speaking senate hearing?
I agree with everything you said. Nonetheless, I think it's ridiculous to be "insulted" as the senator claimed to be in the video and I also think it's ridiculous to applaud the senator for being insulted as Mr. V. did. There are obviously many practical reasons to speak English instead of Spanish and yet it's also understandable to me why someone would want to speak Spanish in such a hearing as a statement. To me, it's just arrogant and silly to be insulted by something that isn't insulting.
The point of it isn't my concern, it's the idea that people are insulted by the "stunt" - it's so ****ing stupid. There's nothing insulting about it.
That's your choice. It's also your subjective judgment that it's pointless and stupid. This just reinforces my argument that being insulted has no valid basis.sorry, but I get "insulted" when people do pointless, stupid stuff. :shrug:
That's your choice. It's also your subjective judgment that it's pointless and stupid. This just reinforces my argument that being insulted has no valid basis.
Again, his "point" is irrelevant to my criticism of the senator's problem with him speaking Spanish. Regardless of the "point", being insulted is dumb and nonsensical since we have no official language in the country...and also since it isn't insulting except to those who choose to be insulted.so help me out and tell me his "point". ... oh that's right, even you agree there wasn't one :roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?