• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

‘Numerous’ officers shot.

I was asked a ridiculously over general question.

If you knew the first thing about hunting you would know that the best tool for hunting deer in wide open country is going to be different then the best tool for hunting deer in dense riparian forest, for example.

the fact that you didn't know that says a lot.

I get the impression that I am talking to a bunch of suburban folks who think gun culture is cool and want to be part of it, but don't really understand.
This is kindergarten stuff. It’s the first thing you learn after safety. If the woods are thick the ranges will be shorter. Heck real hunters will often opt for a shotgun when the woods are thick and ranges likely short. Those that choose the rifle in the thick woods scenario often opt for a heavier bullet to reduce deflection from vegetation. Again grade school. If it’s open country then accuracy is more important and flat shooting cartridges are better since the ranges could be longer. Grade school shit man. How you described things smacks of cut and paste. Like you are a search engine educated hunter lol.

Just as you might own several bolt actions to cover short and long range hunting scenarios there are AR’s that cover it all.

My Colt accurized rifle is capable of half, yes HALF minute of angle 5 shot groups at 100 yards. This puts her in the elite upper bolt action accuracy department. Stock rifle BTW. Actually have 3 SUB 1/2 MOA groups from this rifle.
 
Shooting a 45 in your house would also be stupid.
Why? Be specific. It is a good subsonic round. Would you prefer that I talk to the home invader in calming tones?
 
My over general question? It's asked of your claim that there's a "best" firearm for everything, and the implication that nothing else can serve but "the best".

If you want specific, why is a single shot .410 the best tool for removing snakes from the back deck?
He’s the guy who shoots snakes off his back deck lol?
 
Hmm.
I've hunted deer all over the US Canada and mexico..

Let's hear the specifics and knowledge of what calibers and why for various hunting scenarios.
He will simply google it.
 
Your firearm contributes to the excessive risk of firearm death and injury in American society.
My firearm does no such thing. My firearm only poses a risk to those who would try to hurt or kill me.
 
My firearm does no such thing. My firearm only poses a risk to those who would try to hurt or kill me.
If your loaded firearm is among other people, even your family or friends, it poses a risk to them.
 
Delusional perception of firearm value and necessity has resulted in 100,000 deaths and injuries yearly in the USA.
Your support for abortion results in 600,000 death annually. You SUPPORT this. We oppose and despise the UNLAWFUL misuse of firearms.

And I absolutely do not have any delusions of how important firearms are to me and this country. I have prevented, as in pointed my rifle and chased away, multiple people attempting to break into my gun shop. My wife stopped to attacks by large males to date. She actually drew on one man and threatened the other should he continue his attempt. Both complied and survived.
 
Works best against hordes of zombies during the apocalypses.
Yeah I am not surprised that that little bit of stupidity is the best you could conjure up as a response.
 
I know that you have not apparently followed the evolution of this (sideline) discussion of socialism.
I have. That’s why I can recognize that strawman you are so dishonestly building.
 
Why is it every gun thread is full of people who live in the suburbs, read Guns and Ammo religiously, quote spec sheets, and demonstrate constantly that they are divorced from rural life where guns are tools, nothing more, nothing less.

Every gun thread I encounter is full of people who are into "gun culture" because it is trendy in conservative circles, but who are confused by rural people who actually use guns regularly (not as toys at some suburban range) but as tools, people who hunt for meat, not on guided trips for trophies and pictures, etc.
That quite the imagination you got there.

That you think it’s not painfully obvious that you don’t have a clue what you are talking about is rather telling.
 
If your loaded firearm is among other people, even your family or friends, it poses a risk to them.

If a person is among other people, he poses a risk to them.
 
Running from it? I was ignoring it. It was a stupid troll question.

I have never been to dodridge, if I was going to go (I wouldnt) I would ask a rural local about the terrain etc
And the dodge. Who didn’t see that coming. Anyone?
 
I have no idea what the terrain is like but I guarantee you it's not an AR, regardless of the terrain.

I didn't ask that question though, I asked about terrain.

And you are wrong, an AR is never the right choice, in any possible hunting situation there is a better choice than an AR.
More claims you can’t back up. How unsurprising.
 
You support personal easy access to firearms and wide-spread firearm prevalence in spite of huge firearm morbidity over the last decades. Therefore, you must think that firearm death and injury is acceptable/desirable/rational/inconsequential.
lol nice

You support the legalized murder of innocent babies in the womb. Therefore you must think that abortion death is acceptable/desirable/rational/INCONSEQUENTIAL.

600,000 you support
25,000 we do not support

Not sure I need to give a shit about any of your hypocritical virtue signaling nonsense after this. Way to much blood actually on your hands.
 
You didn't answer what I asked. I asked if reform was only possible with your religion. That doesn't imply that there are not other necessary factors.
Reform is absolutely possible without religion. Even though religion remains the top factor in assisting folks with reform. It’s also a top factor in encouraging folks to reform.
 
It was a stupid question.
Just because your education level doesn’t allow you to answer the question doesn’t make it a stupid question.
It just highlights your lack of knowledge.
 
Lol.

You don't even realize how you suburban posers with your AR's get laughed at behind your backs do you.
The only one posing here is you. And it is hilarious to watch.

And I guarantee I grew up more rural than you.
 
Back
Top Bottom