I assume they were legally appointed following the states correct processes. Whether they had been given the correct instructions is the contentious issue if you believe the big lie.
It's an effective poll tax for those who they want to prevent from voting.
They are elected, so whoever legitimately won the election should have their slate of electors appointed. So, if the election was not legitimate, then the electors are not legally appointed. They're illegally appointed.
There aren't long lines at voting places, generally speaking, particularly with half of voters now voting early or by mail.
First time in history a political operative was delusional and/or lying, I bet. /s
Was there significant fraud in the states that attempted to send fake electors?
Is the challenge legitimate through the courts or is it through violence and rioting?
Oh look, a variation of the "both sides do it" defense.
I don't know. How would I know? I wouldn't, and neither would you. I know WaPo, CNN and the NYTimes reporters swear there isn't, because their anonymous sources claim that everything was on the up-and-up, and we all know reporters are the brightest and the best, so they have done detailed analyses of data, and they have in no way tried to
If you read the full quote, that is what Stone said - challenge it in the courts. His reference to violence is not acceptable, but hardly different than Democrats calling for "unrest" and all that, harassment of elected officials, and the like, when it suits them. Democrats aren't worse, but they certainly aren't better. Politics is about power, and power corrupts, and it's not just Republicans who are corrupted. Both sides will cheat. And, they do. This myth sold to the public that there is "no such thing as voter fraud" is absurd - it strains credulity and is counterintuitive - humans cheat on everything, from taxes to save a buck, to poker games, to tests in order to pass some stupid business administration course, or to get into a club or organization. They lie about everything, but for some reason Democrats have convinced much of the public that voting is sacrosanct, and that to even think that someone would organize a fraud in voting is tantamount to treason. Yet, in many many elections, allegations of fraud, challenges to electors, court cases, etc. are done to try to "overturn" the results. Only when Trump does it, it's treason.
Of course they do - you think Democrats haven't called for violence to serve their political ends? How many examples do you need?
Did you hear about that shooting at a high school football practice yesterday?
Who staged a violent coup at the nation's capital? Trumpers, last time I checked. All your whataboutism doesn't come close. You are preaching to the choir. Only MAGAts believe your BS.
Keep diggin' that hole mang. I'm just gonna watch and laugh.
That’s what I say every time I go to vote with my friends: “**** the voting, let’s get right to the violence.”
I usually call for unrest in the streets, and that they shouldn't let up, because there should be uprisings. That's a lot better.
Be specific about which polling places have the long lines in which states, and why. What happens is that States review the statistics on population and registered voters, and they allocate voting place resources based on the statistical analysis. There is no conspiracy to make Democrats wait in long lines.
So you acknowledge that Stone called for violence, and you interpret this as a legitimate call for voting?
Your fallacy here is called in some circles “failure to draw the line”.
You mean 2020, 2021, 2022, and likely ongoing for Trumps life span. Haven't heard much from Hillary since 2016/17. Besides which, I don't remember Hillary followers trying to prevent Trump taking office via violent interference in the constitutional process.
Did I claim anything from Amy MSM at all ? No I didn't so why is that part of your response? You would rather blame MSM instead of addressing the issue?