• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by grainbelt

  1. G

    Systemic Racism does NOT exist.

    racism little r is a part of life. We all know that. It's an effect of the chaotic and crappy nature of the human condition and goes all directions. What we should want and strive for is for these personal biases to not affect the livelihood of a minority group. Many personal biases against a...
  2. G

    Here's what Republicans should do about Ginsburg's seat

    My point is that the powerful position to have is shifting to the senate, because they become the gatekeeper and it doesnt matter who is prez or who is nominated. The gatekeeper decides. But the actual words in the constitution dont suggest that is supposed to be the case. I think the...
  3. G

    Moody’s: Dem Sweep Brings Economy back; Jobs

    I mean, just look at the equation prior to the pandemic. He and the GOP slashed taxes, exploded the deficit, slashed regulation, started a trade war, renegotiated usmca, signed a first phase China trade deal and still couldn't push the gdp metric over 3% annual. That should tell people...
  4. G

    Democrats are now for term limits (except on themselves of course)

    I like term limits for everything. But they need to discuss. I would think with limits, the terms would initially need to be staggered so there arent 3 or 4 clumped together. And are they back counted on the current justices or will it only be effective for new ones? Sent from my SM-G930V using...
  5. G

    Here's what Republicans should do about Ginsburg's seat

    So who holds the true power over placing sc justices? Seems like it's the senate in your scenario, which is pretty clearly NOT what the verbiage of the constitution lays out. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  6. G

    Here's what Republicans should do about Ginsburg's seat

    So based on that, an opposite party senate can simply not confirm any nominees ever. They would leave open the seat until they either get a predetermined "favorable" nominee or they lose the majority. That is problematic. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  7. G

    Let's see the post-Roe plan

    I get it. They want to reverse/undo the RoeVWade decision. They want to ban abortion. What is the reality that comes after? How do they think things will unfold? They should show us this plan before we commit to something so earth shaking. I don't like abortion and want to minimize it. I just...
  8. G

    Here's what Republicans should do about Ginsburg's seat

    I don't think the dems should focus on expanding the court. They should instead change their platform to break the natural right wing bias the electoral college currently has, since that is what has screwed the left, the working class, the marginalized minorities, and the environment. Term...
  9. G

    Here's what Republicans should do about Ginsburg's seat

    This is leading to a bad precedent. The Garland case was well before the end of the presidents term - almost a year. There is no arbitrary line not to cross, so there is no stopping a situation where an opposite party senate just wont confirm nominees at all. Not even early in the term. And...
  10. G

    The Only Worry about Foxy Amy Coney Barrett is She's Too Good to Be True.

    And what fresh fake universe is that sentiment from? Its alt right racist white supremacists that tend to have the problem with mixed race stuff. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  11. G

    The Only Worry about Foxy Amy Coney Barrett is She's Too Good to Be True.

    If she is a fundamentalist that uses arguments of god being behind things that happen, or god blessing protecting and choosing trump, then no she should not be on the court. If she would be picked only because she would undo and replace the roe v wade precedent, then also no she should not be on...
  12. G

    Four percent.

    Well he should NOT have challenged his own offices and that it existed or was a problem. That blunder lead people down the wrong path. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  13. G

    Democratic Socialism is to be shunned?

    It's cold, homogeneous, sometimes has not enough light or too much, and I dont speak the local language. But also, I can't be bothered to even move states. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  14. G

    Liberals base their opinions on popular culture, while conservatives think for themselves.

    Conservatives base their positions on archaic slogans that are more indoctrinated fantasy than reality at this point. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  15. G

    Shoot On-Site': Chicago Gangs Form Pact To Execute Cops- Thx Biden

    What did Biden do? Last I checked, it's ****ty racist or scared cops killing and harassing black people without accountability that has caused all this. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
See more
Back
Top Bottom