• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Recent content by dcsports

  1. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    Is "Taco" supposed to be some kind of a dig at the president? lol. The disruptive "protests" have had zero impact on his policy. That change is tied to agriculture and other business interests giving feedback to the administration.
  2. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    It's better to make people mad at what you are mad at. Not mad at the people protesting, when those protests turn into disruption, vandalism, etc.
  3. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    It's the goal of any protest. Or at least any that are of value. If your goal in protesting is to look like a fool and make people hate you and your cause, then causing chaos may be the way to go.
  4. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    Please.
  5. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    And that explains the frequent failure of these events. Again, the purpose is to promote your view, to convince people to agree with you. Or at least to be mad about whatever you are. Not to be mad at you.
  6. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    No, that's silly. Already discussed, and debunked by the article itself.
  7. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    No one is doing that.
  8. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    No one has advocated for that.
  9. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    That's exactly the point of a protest. You want to convince people to support your side of the issue - not to drive them away.
  10. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    No, the goal is to persuade people to support your cause. Making people mad at you isn't going to do that.
  11. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    You should stop making them.
  12. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    It is. You are trying to convince people that you are right. To show people that you are supporting a position and taking a stand.
  13. D

    Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

    So you are still digging.
  14. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    Again, literally no one said it was.
  15. D

    "Four San Francisco protesters hit by car in ‘possible intentional act’..."

    Honestly, that's one of your more ridiculous statements. There's no victim here, and I wasn't blaming anyone.
See more
Back
Top Bottom