- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 16,386
- Reaction score
- 7,793
- Location
- Where I am now
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I guess conservatives believe it should not have been:
"e pluribus unum" but rather "e pluribus unum conformare"
In addition to our biological son, we have 2 adopted daughters from China. One we adopted when she was 4 the other when she was 9. Neither of them spoke a word of English when we got them. We only spoke a few phrases in Mandarin. I can't imagine how scary it had to be for them. Our oldest came here just 3 weeks before she had to start school. So here she was, in a completely different country, could not speak a word of English, could not even talk to her new parents, and was going to school where no one would understand her either. The both picked up English really fast though from being immersed in it. That said, our oldest daughter still has a heavy accent despite having been here 4 years now. I think she is still going to sound fresh off the boat when she is 40.
Kudos for your kindness! :thumbs: I can't imagine being in their shoes, and wondering what people are talking about! :mrgreen:
I think you paint with a brush that is a tad bit broad.
I think its great. For too long, media has portrayed America as a much more "white" country than it is. America is a melting pot. I'm sorry if it makes some people uncomfortable to actually see this, but America has ALWAYS been a melting pot and its becoming less and less white every day.
Worth pointing out that all of the founding fathers were British citizens, many had worn the uniform and were subjects of the crown. Van Buren was the first president born a citizen of the United States.
Yes I am as are you.You are free to disagree with me.
Sorry if you took it that way but I'm not, it certainly is not my intention. I am passionate about my perspective, just like you and I have every right to be. I may often be over sentimental for many on this forum, the only people I make the conscious choice to look down on are those who are openly cruel and hateful without any real provocation.I don't need to be lectured about tolerance and freedom, and I don't need to be patronised nor spoken down to. You can disagree with me without being self-righteous,
that's why I asked. It's supposed to be a discussion. You were passionate about your views and so was I. I don't disrespect you for your position but I do disagree with it.whether you are interested in why I feel as I do or not.
People put their opinions here for the very purpose of being discussed and challenged.Your disagreement does not make you superior to me, and my sharing my history in growing up in the midst of another culture does not make me "condescending", despite your rude comment to the contrary. I makes me completely appreciative of the vibrancy of Mexican culture, of VietNamese culture, of Chinese culture, of Persian culture, of Filipino culture, all of which have given me friends, peers and colleagues who have enriched my life, as I hope I have enriched theirs.
This country goes the extra mile for its non-English speaking citizens, residents and guests. We provide free English tutoring, ballots and other public documents are available in dozens of different languages, translators are available free of charge for any who require them, from the classroom to the courtroom, one of the very few countries on the planet that does so. I support this wholeheartedly. I also understand that it sometimes takes a generation or two for assimilation into the American culture, an assimilation which does indeed require being able to eventually communicate with each other. The coexistence of the dozens and dozens of diverse cultures in America does add to our richness as a nation, but I will point out that although these cultures have maintained their history throughout the development of our nation as it is today, those cultures understood that eventually they would have to communicate in the common language of the nation in order to become a part of their new country, and not just an isolated pocket unable to understand their neighbors, and their own government officials.
You seem to be the one that is being intolerant and this is a gross over-reaction.annoyed as I am by your intolerance of any who have differing opinions and life experiences than your own.
And you disappoint me. You're not my Mother. I don't care if I disappointed you. I care if I offended you because I respect and like you but your disappointment for your children. You're are overstepping your reach by even saying that.You disappoint me.
My grandparents came from Northern Europe through Ellis Island. They had very limited knowledge of English, but they knew people who had arrived previously, and they learned from them, and others, just by being exposed to it. Brave souls, but they did it, and it didn't take four schools of language classes! My grandfather called a dime a "diamond," till he died. He gave us kids lots of "diamonds" for ice cream cones back then, and we didn't care what he called them! :mrgreen:
Greetings, Southern Democrat. :2wave:
We live in very sensitive times where anyone questioning the correct political positions is branded a 'racist', 'misogynist', anti Gay, and so on.
However we should keep in mind that language is a means of communication only and encouraging people to speak the common language, especially in a 'melting pot' like the US, is not necessarily a bad thing.
An argument was made a few years ago that 'Ebonics' should be taught to Black children in school because that's what they spoke in their neighborhoods. The result was that these Black children grew up to be unemployable.
These people can be made welcome and encouraged to speak their native language, or any language they choose, but they are likely to be shut out from the mainstream and restricted to working and socializing only with those with the same language and culture. Without English the average person's world shrinks remarkably. And the better your English is the more employable and socially advanced you will become.That's just the way it is.
It was one of the Super Bowl ads:
We live in very sensitive times where anyone questioning the correct political positions is branded a 'racist', 'misogynist', anti Gay, and so on.
However we should keep in mind that language is a means of communication only and encouraging people to speak the common language, especially in a 'melting pot' like the US, is not necessarily a bad thing.
An argument was made a few years ago that 'Ebonics' should be taught to Black children in school because that's what they spoke in their neighborhoods. The result was that these Black children grew up to be unemployable.
These people can be made welcome and encouraged to speak their native language, or any language they choose, but they are likely to be shut out from the mainstream and restricted to working and socializing only with those with the same language and culture. Without English the average person's world shrinks remarkably. And the better your English is the more employable and socially advanced you will become.That's just the way it is.
Actually that's not quite right. Just in case one of the posters ever appears on Jeopardy here is the list.
List of Presidents of the United States by home state - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I find myself agreeing with you again, Gathomas. What a sight. Multiculturalism is useful as a stepping stone to assimilation, but I entirely agree that a nation must have some sort of working lingua franca to get anywhere. France is actually pretty good at this. Despite a huge number of immigrants, French law is stringent that French and French only is the national language, and it is required that everyone in the country speak at least passable French if they want to do anything more than sit at home. This is, in my opinion, one of the last stumbling blocks before the EU can finally self-realise in a big way. I think maybe the French should conquer everyone again, get rid of all the Germans, then we could sweep in and impose English as the language of the EU after the Second Napoleonic World War. Plausible?
Excellent post! :thumbs:
Greetings, Grant. :2wave:
I would argue that John Tyler was the first because he was born after the ratification of the Constitution in 1789.
Martin Van Buren was the first president born after the Declaration of Independence.
Who do you think it might be if not one of those 2?
I would argue that John Tyler was the first because he was born after the ratification of the Constitution in 1789.
Martin Van Buren was the first president born after the Declaration of Independence.
Who do you think it might be if not one of those 2?
I'm not sure of your argument here. Are you saying that because they were born before the Constitution was ratified they were not born in America? Wouldn't that have made them ineligible for the presidency?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?