Devil505
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,512
- Reaction score
- 315
- Location
- Masschusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Seems to me if you would read harder, you would find out that the thread was about his outburst, and the fear-mongering of a rumor campaign designed to scare the voters of his district with extortion.
But there you are, trying your partisan smears again :roll:
Joe needs to attend some anger management classes. :lol:
Why not just address Wilson's comments instead of trying to smear him ?
If you care about racism, really, Senator Byrd would be your target.
These attempts to smear Wilson have nothing to do with a genuine disdain for racism, and everything to do with a partisan smear attempt.
& I'm alleging (with good reason)
None will thanks to Joe Wilson.
. He was in it when he was young and has since disowned them.
No more so than you when you try to bring up racism.
If you want to stay on topic, then stay on it.
If you want to bring up racism, then be ready when I clobber you with the Exalted Cyclops standing 3rd in line behind the president .
Robert Byrd was in the KKK 66 years ago. Try to get more current. He was in it when he was young and has since disowned them. What does this have to do with anything current with Wilson?
These attempts to smear Wilson have nothing to do with a genuine disdain for racism, and everything to do with a partisan smear attempt.
Again you don't know what would have been in the final bill
Is there something magical about a "draft bill" that makes it so no one can lie about what it currently contains ?
So did David Duke, but he was a Republican, so nobody believed it.
Well I don't believe it about your Exalted Cyclops either.
The scuzzy dems, keep that racist, because of his seniority and his committee seats.
They don't mind getting in bed with a senile racist, IF it will bring them more power.
Then they have the temerity to sling racism claims. :roll:
No, you don't have "good reason" you have partisan opportunistic reasons.
If you really gave two poops about racism, you would be focusing your efforts on removing the Klansman from the line of presidential succession.
You don't. You think racism is a handy smear at the moment against a political foe. A political foe who humbled Obama into backing down.
And again, it makes no difference to the fact that Obama lied, on Wednesday, about what was or was not in "THE THING" on Wednesday.
Why don't you answer that question you have been running from ?
Duke was a grand wizard of the KKK he formed the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
Byrd didn't gain political attention because of the KKK.
Since you're confused again
Is there something magical about a "draft bill" that makes it so no one can lie about what it currently contains ?
How radically uninformed you are :rofl
Formed them eh ? Do you think David Duke was alive in 1865 ?
Quite Simply False. His KKK cronies sponsored his first run for office.
I'm not confused, I know a question dodger when I see one.
Here's that question you have been dodging, why don't you answer it and try to salvage a shred of credibility ?
You have a pile of evidence, right?& I'm alleging (with good reason) that his outburst was caused by his racist mentality & his district's voters have good reason to be afraid to vote for him.
Simply claiming it doesn't make it true. Byrd has been out of the KKK since the year after he joined
Your question has nothing to do with Obama speaking in future tense.
Is there something magical about a "draft bill" that makes it so no one can lie about what it currently contains ?
It is a widely known fact that his KKK cronies are the same people who encouraged and supported his first run for office. Do your own Homework.
Your time machine attempts don't help you anymore than your semantic antics did.
Then I will do your homework for you, right after you answer that question you have been dodging . . .Well then it shouldn't be too hard for you to prove
Is there something magical about a "draft bill" that makes it so no one can lie about what it currently contains ?
Then I will do your homework for you, right after you answer tht question you have been dodging . . .
So in other words
Is there something magical about a "draft bill" that makes it so no one can lie about what it currently contains ? Ah there isn't ? OK then.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?