Here's an example of how a doctor faced absurd denial to approve a surgery.
Are you now saying you are against capitalism? Or should I say, so you agree, capitalism is out of hand.I want two numbers: what the hospital bills for that surgery and what the surgeon actually takes home. Then line it up against what patients pay abroad. If we're multiples higher, the denial isn't the outrage - the pricing is.
Are you now saying you are against capitalism? Or should I say, so you agree, capitalism is out of hand.
Here's something you need to look into- how much that surgeon and that hospital have to pay for insurance compared to abroad.I want two numbers: what the hospital bills for that surgery and what the surgeon actually takes home. Then line it up against what patients pay abroad. If we're multiples higher, the denial isn't the outrage - the pricing is.
Here's an example of how a doctor faced absurd denial to approve a surgery.
All they have to get away with it is lie, 'Democrats are lying that there are cuts, there are no cuts, Republicans improved healthcare'In January 2026, traditional Medicare is implementing a trial "pilot" program in 6 states (vance perhaps suggested his home state be one) in which certain procedures and treatments will have to receive prior approval. That's bad enough. Even worse, the tech companies that oversee the AI's yay or nay responses will receive a portion of the money "saved" by the Feds every time the response is, "NO!".
Yep, tech companies make more money, the more times seniors are told they cannot have a certain procedure, cannot receive that steroid shot....
Getting ****ed by the trump administration. I'm spreading the news to those of us who have opted for traditional Medicare. (We're in the minority.)
You mean gouging? I've listened to enough of others on here tell me there is no such thing as gouging.No, I'm against artificial scarcity.
You mean gouging?
I've listened to enough of others on here tell me there is no such thing as gouging.
I want two numbers: what the hospital bills for that surgery and what the surgeon actually takes home. Then line it up against what patients pay abroad. If we're multiples higher, the denial isn't the outrage - the pricing is.
No, I'm against artificial scarcity.
All foreign countries are have socialist and universal healthcare.
Are you saying that’s a better system that we should be benchmarking to and striving to emulate?
All of them have private clinics as well. Remember, it always has to be a two-tiered system, so that the elites don't get stuck in the shit public system. Just like education in the US.
No. Their prices are inflated too - but if the US system is charging two or three times more, then the blame for a denial doesn't lie with the insurance company.
Sure. They have a better public health system as a result. What’s the problem?
Things like brain surgery, MRIs, and a course of chemotherapy and radiation for cancer are never going to be cheap. Many things on the free market are like that.
So the alternative is either to let poor people die because they can’t get it, or have some kind of universal healthcare system.
But no moral and sane people with any sense of conscience are going to just accept masses of poor people dying off, going blind, becoming debilitated, etc… just as a price of maintaining free market capitalism. They may be fine with someone not being able to afford a car or a watch. But death as a price for hitting hard times is not acceptable.
Healthcare is fundamentally different than other commodities.
Pricing is completely immaterial . It means nothing.I want two numbers: what the hospital bills for that surgery and what the surgeon actually takes home. Then line it up against what patients pay abroad. If we're multiples higher, the denial isn't the outrage - the pricing is.
Um … Medicare advantage already does that. They are way worse than traditional Medicare.In January 2026, traditional Medicare is implementing a trial "pilot" program in 6 states (vance perhaps suggested his home state be one) in which certain procedures and treatments will have to receive prior approval. That's bad enough. Even worse, the tech companies that oversee the AI's yay or nay responses will receive a portion of the money "saved" by the Feds every time the response is, "NO!".
Yep, tech companies make more money, the more times seniors are told they cannot have a certain procedure, cannot receive that steroid shot....
Getting ****ed by the trump administration. I'm spreading the news to those of us who have opted for traditional Medicare. (We're in the minority.)
Not when there is a two tiered system . That tends to cause issues as better aging patients leave the public system.Sure. They have a better public health system as a result. What’s the problem?
MRIs can be cheap. Cancer treatment unlikely as there is not enough volume to be done cheaply.Things like brain surgery, MRIs, and a course of chemotherapy and radiation for cancer are never going to be cheap. Many things on the free market are like that.
The type of universal system is the key.So the alternative is either to let poor people die because they can’t get it, or have some kind of universal healthcare system.
Of course. Which is why we don’t allow it in America and why our costs are higher because we wait until a life threatening situation develops.But no moral and sane people with any sense of conscience are going to just accept masses of poor people dying off, going blind, becoming debilitated, etc… just as a price of maintaining free market capitalism.
Not really.They may be fine with someone not being able to afford a car or a watch. But death as a price for hitting hard times is not acceptable.
Healthcare is fundamentally different than other commodities.