• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Yet amother mass shooting

Simpletruther

DP Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
19,659
Reaction score
3,716
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I mean mass fatality auto accident.


Did not even make that national news because nobody gives a shit.

There is a easy solution to these constant mass killings that happen all the time, seem like every day (you wouldn't know it of course. Because again, nobody gives a shit).

Nobody wants to do what it takes to stop this.

Sensible common sense speed limits 45 on the interstate and 35 on 2 lanes. STRICTLY ENFORRCED. This would virtually iliiminate deaths.

THOUSANDS OF DEATHS, OVER 40,000 THOUSAND a year. . far more deaths than homicides.

You liberals care too much about shaving a few minutes off your drive to care about poor little baby Johnny, who got mangled in that accident.
 
I mean mass fatality auto accident.


Did not even make that national news because nobody gives a shit.

There is a easy solution to these constant mass killings that happen all the time, seem like every day (you wouldn't know it of course. Because again, nobody gives a shit).

Nobody wants to do what it takes to stop this.

Sensible common sense speed limits 45 on the interstate and 35 on 2 lanes. STRICTLY ENFORRCED. This would virtually iliiminate deaths.

THOUSANDS OF DEATHS, OVER 40,000 THOUSAND a year. . far more deaths than homicides.

You liberals care too much about shaving a few minutes off your drive to care about poor little baby Johnny, who got mangled in that accident.

As has been pointed out a million times, cars are licensed and regulated. Why shouldn't we have that with guns?
 
As has been pointed out a million times, cars are licensed and regulated. Why shouldn't we have that with guns?
And inspected, and insured.

All of which have to be renewed on a regular basis.

And you have to take a test to be issued a driver's license - likely two (one written, one actually driving).

Funny how none of those things are required for guns.

If we put a fraction of the restrictions around guns that already exist around vehicles, how many fewer innocent victims would die from gun violence annually?
 
As has been pointed out a million times, cars are licensed and regulated. Why shouldn't we have that with guns?
As i have pointed out a million times, that fact doesnt magically change the incredible death toll that could easily be solved. But nobody gives a shit.

And guns are regulated.
 
Guns are not regulated to nearly the extent that vehicles are.

Try again.
Sure they are. Heck, now if you have the wrong piece of plastic installed you can go to prison.
 
I mean mass fatality auto accident.


Did not even make that national news because nobody gives a shit.

There is a easy solution to these constant mass killings that happen all the time, seem like every day (you wouldn't know it of course. Because again, nobody gives a shit).

Nobody wants to do what it takes to stop this.

Sensible common sense speed limits 45 on the interstate and 35 on 2 lanes. STRICTLY ENFORRCED. This would virtually iliiminate deaths.

THOUSANDS OF DEATHS, OVER 40,000 THOUSAND a year. . far more deaths than homicides.

You liberals care too much about shaving a few minutes off your drive to care about poor little baby Johnny, who got mangled in that accident.
Vehicles get goods and people from place to place. Accidents happen as a result of people driving but 99.99% are unintentional.

Guns put holes in things. Animals, targets, and people. A gun has no purpose other than to destroy things.
 
And inspected, and insured.

All of which have to be renewed on a regular basis.

And you have to take a test to be issued a driver's license - likely two (one written, one actually driving).

Funny how none of those things are required for guns.

If we put a fraction of the restrictions around guns that already exist around vehicles, how many fewer innocent victims would die from gun violence annually?
And if you are found driving while intoxicated, your license is taken away and you are no longer able to drive. Why can’t we do that with a gun
 
Sure they are. Heck, now if you have the wrong piece of plastic installed you can go to prison.
There is a national law against some types of plastic adaptors for guns? Can you name it?
 
I mean mass fatality auto accident.


Did not even make that national news because nobody gives a shit.

There is a easy solution to these constant mass killings that happen all the time, seem like every day (you wouldn't know it of course. Because again, nobody gives a shit).

Nobody wants to do what it takes to stop this.

Sensible common sense speed limits 45 on the interstate and 35 on 2 lanes. STRICTLY ENFORRCED. This would virtually iliiminate deaths.

THOUSANDS OF DEATHS, OVER 40,000 THOUSAND a year. . far more deaths than homicides.

You liberals care too much about shaving a few minutes off your drive to care about poor little baby Johnny, who got mangled in that accident.

Better yet would be to require that vehicles be incapable of exceeding the maximum speed limit. I still say that should be 25, but yours is a reasonable compromise.
 
And if you are found driving while intoxicated, your license is taken away and you are no longer able to drive. Why can’t we do that with a gun
Even having an open container of alcohol in a vehicle can get you arrested, you don't even have to be intoxicated.

Let's do that with guns also. No carrying ANYWHERE that there is alcohol, period.
 
Vehicles get goods and people from place to place. Accidents happen as a result of people driving but 99.99% are unintentional.

Guns put holes in things. Animals, targets, and people. A gun has no purpose other than to destroy things.

That's how you're choosing to semantically argue. I could as easily say that motor vehicles can't operate without destroying things, so it makes no difference if you've decided that is their purpose or not. Thus, we marginalize and disregard any peaceful, legitimate use.
 
Better yet would be to require that vehicles be incapable of exceeding the maximum speed limit. I still say that should be 25, but yours is a reasonable compromise.
You must not have been around in the 1970s.
 
That's how you're choosing to semantically argue. I could as easily say that motor vehicles can't operate without destroying things, so it makes no difference if you've decided that is their purpose or not. Thus, we marginalize and disregard any peaceful, legitimate use.
Go for it. If you make that argument, then all things destroy things.

Guns are meant for killing. There is no other use for a gun. It is a weapon, and all weapons are made to kill.
 
Guns are not regulated to nearly the extent that vehicles are.

Try again.

I can't buy a gun without undergoing a criminal background check. Felons, the dishonorably discharged, those convicted of domestic violence, those subject to orders of protection, and even those convicted of serious misdemeanors can't own a gun.

But you say a person using the public highways has to obey the regulations concerning the use of those roads?

Oh my...life is HARD!

😆
 
I mean mass fatality auto accident.


Did not even make that national news because nobody gives a shit.

There is a easy solution to these constant mass killings that happen all the time, seem like every day (you wouldn't know it of course. Because again, nobody gives a shit).

Nobody wants to do what it takes to stop this.

Sensible common sense speed limits 45 on the interstate and 35 on 2 lanes. STRICTLY ENFORRCED. This would virtually iliiminate deaths.

THOUSANDS OF DEATHS, OVER 40,000 THOUSAND a year. . far more deaths than homicides.

You liberals care too much about shaving a few minutes off your drive to care about poor little baby Johnny, who got mangled in that accident.

As stupid a post as can possibly be posted.
This post gets 3! That is rare. 🤡 🤡 🤡
 
Cars are owned and used far more often than guns of any kind.

The odds are there will be more fatalities simply by sheer volume of use.

Guns are entertaining, not necessary for employment or travel--and in some cases, providing shelter for the homeless.

So yeah, stupid OP. Sorry, but it is really stupid.
 
Go for it. If you make that argument, then all things destroy things.

Guns are meant for killing. There is no other use for a gun. It is a weapon, and all weapons are made to kill.

Absolutist nonsense is easily refuted. A Browning BT99 is specifically made for ATA competition.

Let alone the tens of millions of guns that are used hundreds of millions of times without killing anything. Rather remarkable that they can be used so often for things other than what you claim is their only use.
 
Absolutist nonsense is easily refuted. A Browning BT99 is specifically made for ATA competition.

Let alone the tens of millions of guns that are used hundreds of millions of times without killing anything. Rather remarkable that they can be used so often for things other than what you claim is their only use.
What about car crashes in Chicago?
 
How much of an idiot does one have to be to equate guns and cars?

It's the stark difference in how the deaths are considered which is being contrasted.
 
Back
Top Bottom