- Joined
- Aug 25, 2018
- Messages
- 17,236
- Reaction score
- 7,119
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So you will share your hard-earned money with me? I like this idea.
Also, in before you say I am not a human. I know your dirty tricks.
Why should I? Why can't you just take cash out of your checking account and give it to me? After all, you said it yourself, you need to share your wealth with all mankind. And I am a part of mankind. So where is my free money?Sure, send me all your financial information, such as income tax returns, paystubs, etc.
I am more of a Puppy People. Cute and cuddly.OK, that's just making me suspicious....Fess up! Are you one of those Lizard People Alex Jones talks about?
22 millions of those illegals are right here in Kalifornia, I believe 2 million of them voted for Globalist Granny.
22 millions of those illegals are right here in Kalifornia, I believe 2 million of them voted for Globalist Granny.
gullible
or gul·la·ble
[guhl-uh-buhl]
SynonymsExamplesWord Origin
See more synonyms for gullible on Thesaurus.com
adjective
easily deceived or cheated.
...and ignoring US immigration law. And we are educating, feeding, and housing their families as they may be common law (or local) married but single parent here in the USA with dad supplementing the welfare check.
It also distorts economics in that you get accustomed to paying below market labor.
There are plenty of indirect costs.
Why should I? Why can't you just take cash out of your checking account and give it to me? After all, you said it yourself, you need to share your wealth with all mankind. And I am a part of mankind. So where is my free money?
You seem to be against sharing and helping your fellow man, and in my experience that means you are likely either Muslim or Christian, and being from the USA likely a Christian. Is this correct?
No. It's not correct.
All I am doing is asking you to set an example yourself.
If you want the West to share their wealth with others, then you should be the first one to do it.
Why are you having such a difficult time giving me your money?
So you're an atheist? That seems strange because usually atheists are all about helping others in my experience, although I'm sure there are exceptions.
That's what I do on a daily basis. I volunteer 20 hours a week to help those less fortunate, week in and week out.
If you personally want to send money to third-world countries, that's fine. But you don't get to demand that other people do the same. Unless you are POTUS, and even then, you could still get flak for it. Nobody wants to have their hard-earned money taken away from them and just given to someone else, no matter how good of a cause YOU THINK it is.I do, we send a good deal of money to third world countries. Unfortunately, my little contribution won't amount to much, it will take the rich countries of the world to unite and do this.
But in your post, you did not specify that people would have to prove that they are in need. You just said the West should share their wealth with all mankind. So I guess either you are backpedaling desperately, or that you did not think it through when you first made that statement.I'm not. Just show me that you are in as much need as others and I will help you.
I will only do so if you also apply the same standards to everybody else. So, are you going to?Please send me your last years income tax paperwork for you and your family, your paystubs for you and your family.
Sorry, but I don't know you so I need evidence. I could ask why you won't provide evidence. For all I know (and I'm not accusing you of this, just being cautious), you're someone trying to pull a Trump on me.
I didn't make any insults against you as a person. I said your posts were nonsense. People on this board are allowed to have an opinion on other people's posts.
Also, I am from the same area as you. Lol. So much for your little rant.
No, only a half dozen troll posts having nothing to do with anything.
Not like you're over-reacting with pages of posts....six? seriously. And that's not trolling me.
Good bye.
You like to make it all about me to distract people from the fact you cannot put your money where your mouth is, though.
If this is true, then it's good. But since this is the internet, and that I don't know you at all, I think I will allow for the possibility that you might be lying.
If you personally want to send money to third-world countries, that's fine.
But you don't get to demand that other people do the same.
Unless you are POTUS, and even then, you could still get flak for it. Nobody wants to have their hard-earned money taken away from them and just given to someone else, no matter how good of a cause YOU THINK it is.
But in your post, you did not specify that people would have to prove that they are in need.
You just said the West should share their wealth with all mankind.
So I guess either you are backpedaling desperately, or that you did not think it through when you first made that statement.
I will only do so if you also apply the same standards to everybody else. So, are you going to?
In other words, "Wah I can't deal with Wan nor her posts, so I put her on ignore".
Then kindly bring it to my attention. Maybe I missed it.That's a lie. I've offered at least twice now, but you refuse to take me up on the offer.
You seem very eager to slap the label of "liar" on me. This whole debate seems to be emotionally charged for you. I wonder why.But as far you know I haven't lied. You have lied, see above. So my word, until you show I lied, is good. Yours is not.
True, but other people also get to disagree with you. I am one of them.Huh? I get to state what I think would work best for mankind.
I am not a "Conservative". I am not even an American. But I see that Conservatives are your favourite enemy and a source of terror for you.Yeah, I've noticed that whenever Conservatives want to get the vote out, they talk about sharing with brown skinned people. The racist Southern Strategy comes to mind, that's what it's all built on. Ronald Reagan talked about "Young bucks and Welfare Queens."
But there are still people who are doing OK in countries that are impoverished. If you want to be very precise, which you should be if you are dealing with money, then you should do this on each individual case.Well no kidding, you're seriously making this comment? OK, you probably just don't know. It's already been done. There are many many studies about which countries are impoverished.
I disagree.Rich nations should share their wealth with poor nations, help them get caught up. Yeah, I sincerely believe this would help mankind as a whole.
Your clumsy attempt at insulting me is very cute.As I pointed out above, the research has been done, we know which countries are impoverished and need help. I'm sincerely surprised you are no aware of this, or if you are that you are unable to include this information in a coherent argument.
My main issue with your stance is that people should not have to be forced to give money to other nations/people in other nations. Furthermore, it is not the job of a nation's government to help other nations. Governments' job is to take care of their own citizens, not foreign nationals.I try to be consistent in all my beliefs, that's why I try to always base them on the best available evidence, but that doesn't mean I can't make a mistake. In this case I have used the same standards for everyone.
Go back and read. I will need some information from you to ensure I'm not getting Trumped. This is obviously a reasonable request for anyone requesting money over the internet, Trump isn't the only flimflam man about.Then kindly bring it to my attention. Maybe I missed it.
You seem very eager to slap the label of "liar" on me.
This whole debate seems to be emotionally charged for you. I wonder why.
One more thing, I technically did not say you lied. I merely said I allow for the possibility that you might be lying. There is a difference between this and outright accusing you of lying. But apparently this is too nuanced for you.
But there are still people who are doing OK in countries that are impoverished. If you want to be very precise, which you should be if you are dealing with money, then you should do this on each individual case.
But anyway, I do sort of see your point. The West do give financial aids to impoverished countries. But keep in mind that not everybody agrees with this. In fact, I do not agree with it myself. Doing charities is a good thing, but I feel it should be done on a voluntary basis. Governments should not force people to give money to other countries via taxation.
I disagree.
Your clumsy attempt at insulting me is very cute.
My main issue with your stance is that people should not have to be forced to give money to other nations/people in other nations. Furthermore, it is not the job of a nation's government to help other nations. Governments' job is to take care of their own citizens, not foreign nationals.
Go back and read. I will need some information from you to ensure I'm not getting Trumped. This is a reasonable request.
I'm not eager to do anything. You lied about me, I pointed it out.
You're the one lying, so that indicates to me that it is emotionally charged for you. Otherwise you would not have felt the need to lie about me.
I see you are refusing to take responsibility for what you posted. Having read other's comments about your posts, I'm not surprised.
Nice strawman.
Not everybody has to agree. I simply stated my point of view: The rich nations should help the poor nations get caught up, that this will benefit all of mankind. As I said earlier, if mankind does not get off this rock, we will eventually be exterminated. More brains will give us a better chance at success, who knows, some child who dies at two because of malnutrition might have been able to discover an inexpensive and simple means of bypassing the limiting factor of the speed of light.
You're allowed.
Facts aren't insults. Why do you think they are?
That's my opinion. I believe in sharing and helping my neighbours, and all mankind, regardless of race or creed. You don't, and that's fine.
In terms of this thread, if poor countries were caught up to Western nations, we wouldn't be seeing this mass influx of "illegal" immigrants into the USA. Their reasons for coming would be gone.
I won't get into any more of this back-and-forth exchange with you, because I have better use for my time than talking to someone like you. So I will just state my bottom line: it is NOT the job of a nation's government to take care of other nations or foreign nationals. It is also unjust to essentially force people to give money to other nations through taxation. So until you can rationally argue against either of these statements, I think I will do my own thing.
You're the one who had to resort to lying, so please don't tell me I'm the one who needs to come up with a rational argument. Thanks.
I really don't care whether you think I lied or not. But your utter inability to counter my statements is noted, though.
You lied. How can I "counter" lies? Please be reasonable.
Here is my opinion about the OP in regards to what I've said. Any comment?
In terms of this thread, if poor countries were caught up to Western nations, we wouldn't be seeing this mass influx of "illegal" immigrants into the USA. Their reasons for coming would be gone.
How about you counter my statements first before you ask me to do anything? I asked first, so you should answer first.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?