I think it's idiotic to frame the issue in anything other than a sociological perspective. The damage done to society is the issue at hand, not whether an individual likes it.
So much for that vast sociological knowledge you claim. You don't seem to understand grouping. If a white person lives and works in a group where they are one of a handful of whites, they ARE the minority sociologically speaking. So much for that "majority privilege" you seem to misunderstand.
Idiocy. Systemic majority privilege cannot be escaped, localized discrimination can. See the difference?
Thus, the context MUST be national or global, not local.
I think it's idiotic to suggest that people should be the servants of society.
Idiocy. Majority privilege is systemic and cannot be escaped, localized discrimination can. See the difference?
Thus, the context MUST be national or global, not local.
Except we are not purely national, we are a union of STATES. We are structured to be a union of localities, with the ultimate powers to come from the local up.
Obeying laws against damaging society, when one is using public funds and infrastructure for profit, is not "being a servant".
Henrin busts out the victim card - big surprise.
Obeying laws against damaging society, when one is using public funds and infrastructure for profit, is not "being a servant".
Henrin busts out the victim card - big surprise.
So besides small local businesses who do you think would discriminate?
And you bust out the busted "public funds and infrastructure" argument. Which is another way of saying, if you breathe air I want you to do it my way.
What public funds is most companies using? Yes, they are using roads and power, but then they are paying for those things, so that is a moot point.
You're joking, right? You give me pangs of pity.
Only irrelevant to YOU when you wish to have your arguments make sense.
Couldn't think of an answer could you. Yeah, your arguments do tend to evaporate when called to reality. You should do something about that.
No, your "we were designed as..." crap is -in fact- crap. There can be no doubt whom is the majority power nationally.
You think a local business cannot be considered in a national context? Ahhh... more pangs of pity.
You're joking, right? You give me pangs of pity.
Thus, the context MUST be national or global, not local.
I don't think you'd find many people these days who would.
What about MuslimsFundamentalist Christians would seem to be the exception, there are lots of them that don't want to "catch the gay".
What about Muslims
Fundamentalist Christians would seem to be the exception, there are lots of them that don't want to "catch the gay".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?