- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Yes. If its democratically brought forth and gone through the proper legislative process, and the only way they would do that is repeal the 2nd amendment, but that will never happen.
Repeal the Gun Control Act of 1987.Of course not. The people need to be armed with militarily effective weapons. How can they form a militia without them?
When the founders wrote the 1st Amendment they meant telegrams and pidgins, not military grade high-capacity assault internetz.well what would they say? the M16 was far more conceivable in 1790 than the internet or tv or radio was
well what would they say? the M16 was far more conceivable in 1790 than the internet or tv or radio was
you cannot repeal any of the BOR...rights are unalienable..
John Adams--[You have Rights] antecedent to all earthly governments: Rights, that cannot be repealed<----- or restrained by human laws; Rights, derived from the Great .... of the Bill of Rights as its point of departure in interpreting and enforcing that Bill of Rights
Still, neither were conceivable. Not was the scope of an army that would have such a massive build up. They never conceived of any of it. And if they void see this, it would be interesting, and I suspect disappointing to everyone what hey would say.
Repeal the Gun Control Act of 1987.
you are incorrect
the concept of a rapid firing firearm already existed.
In the Cruikshank decision (mid 1870s) the USSC noted that the RKBA was not CREATED by the USSC and would exist even if the document were to disappear. dishonest racist and bigoted federal judges used that language to claim that the second amendment did not create (true it recognized) an individual RKBA
senile Justice Stevens whined about Heller overturning crappy CoA decisions-claiming that they should be respected despite being unable to argue that they were based on proper interpretations of Cruikshank
Not for mass consumption. Not individually. Not with the violence we see today. No, I don't think I'm off much at all.
When the founders wrote the 1st Amendment they meant telegrams and pidgins, not military grade high-capacity assault internetz.
Not for mass consumption. Not individually. Not with the violence we see today. No, I don't think I'm off much at all.
I'm not certain that amendment was ever properly ratified. There seems to be a cloud of confusion around it. But anyway, I'd like the whole thing taken down. No NICS. No FFLs. Buy whatever you want, from or to whomever you want. No registration, no permits, don't even bother stamping the gun with a serial number, it won't be needed.you mean the Hughes Amendment of 1986 that banned anyone other than servants of the state from possessing machine guns made after may 19, 1986
You are just making stuff up now. less people are killed with the crap your side calls "military grade rifles" than with baseball bats, knives and hammers
the public can own fully automatic weapons, they must pay a tax stamp, and undergo a more intense background check.......but who has $15,000 for an automatic weapon?
I'm sure there re people, but most f us have no need for one.
84.63% of all statistics are made up on the spot.over 12,000 people were murdered last year, 49 % were killed with hands guns.
2.5 % were killed with rifles.
6% were killed by fist from a physical beating.
4% from things like bats and hammers.
84.63% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
True. And that is why we have to constantly revisit these things. The foundering fathers never expected us to stop thinking.
84.63% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
That doesn't matter. It's only excuse making on your part.
Btw, you might check with the CDC. I think I saw death by firearms the fifth leading cause of death (might be related to an age group). Any, only if you're curious.
No seriously, why don't stories of online bullying spur a call to limit braod-band connections? "You don't need 30rnds to hunt" = "you don't need a 15/25 connection to check your e-mail"
I'm saying you don't know how to make a claim without sourcing it. You have to be challenged for a source, and that betrays your dishonest nature.are you saying i made this up my friend?
Lou Dobbs Tonight : FBC : January 14, 2013 7:00pm-8:00pm EST : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
rights of honest people are not held hostage by the actions of criminals
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?