I doubt Trump voters are one issue voters unlike democrats who seem to get stuck on the issue of the day.
Trump Elected President, Thanks to 4 in 5 White Evangelicals | News ...
Trump Elected President, Thanks to 4 in 5 White Evangelicals | News & Reporting | Christianity Today › News & Reporting › Archives › 2016 › November
Nov 9, 2016 - The only demographics that broke for Trump more than white evangelicals were Republican men (90%), Republican women (89%), and conservatives (81%). Americans who attend religious services weekly also favored Trump, but by a narrower 56 percent to 40 percent margin over Clinton. Monthly ...
I doubt Trump voters are one issue voters unlike democrats who seem to get stuck on the issue of the day.
Trump "won" because of ignorance, prejudice, and and the republican trademark, ginned up fear, according to the facts.....
Didn't know it, but if I were American it sure would. Hell, if a Canadian Prime Minister did that he might screw his party for generations.
What was the money for, that Bill Clinton paid?
edit- Just Googled it. It was an out-of-court settlement on a lawsuit, not hush money. I'm not defending Clinton, but paying a porn star to keep quiet about boinking her is about the slimiest thing I can recall a politician in my time doing.
Most past presidents are smart enough to bite their tongue when new presidencies are sworn in...Joe Biden is just the gift that keeps on giving. I am surprised you didn't mention Governor Brown? Now there is a special prize of liberal thinking.
I guess you forgot that Trump was elected because of liberal policies that didn't work for the average American.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
...The ACA's major provisions came into force in 2014. By 2016, the uninsured share of the population had roughly halved, with estimates ranging from 20–24 million additional people covered during 2016.[6][7] The increased coverage was due, roughly equally, to an expansion of Medicaid eligibility and to major changes to individual insurance markets. Both involved new spending, funded through a combination of new taxes and cuts to Medicare provider rates and Medicare Advantage. Several Congressional Budget Office reports said that overall these provisions reduced the budget deficit, that repealing the ACA would increase the deficit[8][9], and that the law reduced income inequality by taxing primarily the top 1% to fund roughly $600 in benefits on average to families in the bottom 40% of the income distribution.[10] The law also enacted a host of delivery system reforms intended to constrain healthcare costs and improve quality. After the law went into effect, increases in overall healthcare spending slowed, including premiums for employer-based insurance plans.[11]
The act largely retains the existing structure of Medicare, Medicaid, and the employer market, but individual markets were radically overhauled around a three-legged scheme.[2][12] Insurers in these markets are made to accept all applicants and charge the same rates regardless of pre-existing conditions or sex. To combat resultant adverse selection, the act mandates that individuals buy insurance and insurers cover a list of "essential health benefits". However, a repeal of the tax mandate, passed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, will become effective in 2019. To help households between 100–400% of the Federal Poverty Line afford these compulsory policies, the law provides insurance premium subsidies. Other individual market changes include health marketplaces and risk adjustment programs....
Did they like the boy talk, aka locker room talk, as much as they liked Trump's declaration that the women had to be punished, if they interfered with the
"rights" of a growth inside their own bodies?
Yawn......Sixty million ignorance, prejudice, fear mongering voters...Yeah..gotcha. Now you know why democrats lost by calling Trumps voters the basket of deplorable and racist! I would suggest liberals try a different strategy.
So much BS, so little time.....
It is pretty sad that I need to remind you...but, here ya' go:
Thread: Would Trump have won the election, if Stormy Daniels didn't sign.
Yawn......Sixty million ignorance, prejudice, fear mongering voters...Yeah..gotcha. Now you know why democrats lost by calling Trumps voters the basket of deplorable and racist! I would suggest liberals try a different strategy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
..The ACA's major provisions came into force in 2014. By 2016, the uninsured share of the population had roughly halved, with estimates ranging from 20–24 million additional people covered during 2016.[6][7] The increased coverage was due, roughly equally, to an expansion of Medicaid eligibility and to major changes to individual insurance markets. Both involved new spending, funded through a combination of new taxes and cuts to Medicare provider rates and Medicare Advantage. Several Congressional Budget Office reports said that overall these provisions reduced the budget deficit, that repealing the ACA would increase the deficit[8][9], and that the law reduced income inequality by taxing primarily the top 1% to fund roughly $600 in benefits on average to families in the bottom 40% of the income distribution.[10] The law also enacted a host of delivery system reforms intended to constrain healthcare costs and improve quality. After the law went into effect, increases in overall healthcare spending slowed, including premiums for employer-based insurance plans.[11]
The act largely retains the existing structure of Medicare, Medicaid, and the employer market, but individual markets were radically overhauled around a three-legged scheme.[2][12] Insurers in these markets are made to accept all applicants and charge the same rates regardless of pre-existing conditions or sex. To combat resultant adverse selection, the act mandates that individuals buy insurance and insurers cover a list of "essential health benefits". However, a repeal of the tax mandate, passed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, will become effective in 2019. To help households between 100–400% of the Federal Poverty Line afford these compulsory policies, the law provides insurance premium subsidies. Other individual market changes include health marketplaces and risk adjustment programs....
That number and characterization is off. I would suggest that no more than half of the Trump vote came from ignorant, stupid, deplorables motivated by fear and prejudice while the other half simply pulled the Republican lever out of life long habit and for them it amounted to a knee jerk reflex that mentally no longer have any control over.
Yawn....The fact is the majority of people forced on the ACA was forced off insurance programs they liked. If it ain't broken no need to fix it.
No.. but Monica was...and over that affair it resulted in the big lie that got Clinton impeached. In fact wasn't Bill Clinton governor of Ak at the time of the Paula Jones scandal?
I voted that he would not have won, mainly because his victory was shallow -- a mere 100,000 votes over three states would have tipped the scale the other way.
Instead of posting partisan propaganda here, posting no supporting cites, why not "dress up" this article, vetted in a competition of public editors, describing the ACA?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
Do you not, or simply refuse to understand that the $130,000 oayment, allegedly by Michael Cohn, looks, smells, sounds, and walks like
an undisclosed contribution to the Trump presidential campaign, and, just as in the example of Trump reneging on his commitment to release
his tax returns, as all other major party candidates have for the last 40 years, the majority of Americans look poorly on Trump's deliberate truth
and transparency deficits. He and Cohn could clear up the question of who actually paid who, and why, if Trump had any respect for the American
people, his office, or for the law.
... Because she had a (D) behind her name? Or they were looking for free ****? Both.....
https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/democracy/history.html
...Many Americans think of it as the head of the least democratic branch of the federal government, designed by the framers of the U.S. Constitution to protect vulnerable minorities against the tyranny of the majority...
Surprise, surprise...Trump still carried the married women vote.
she has every right to speak her mind.
Hillary is a far more experienced public servant with decades of public service helping Americans. Every smear that Trumpettes tossed at her, namely, lying, corruption, self-dealing, "swamp", etc., were not true -- but exactly what we have gotten by electing Trump -- precisely what liberals predicted.Wow, just wow. For conversation sake what would you say were the reasons people voted for Hillary? Because she had a (D) behind her name? Or they were looking for free ****? Both.....
Well, Romney said something pretty bad as well to donors after his defeat. The differences were it was immediately after the defeat, not over a year later, and it was limited to saying "free stuff." He didn't go into an extended tirade about, say, blacks, the coasts, Virginia, or whoever else.
Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
so if she was struck by lightning and was no longer alive, would republicans still use clinton as an electoral lightning rod?
IF she cares about the country, then she needs to shut up.
Hillary really does need to shut up.
... assuming she cares about the country.
She apparently can't stop saying stupid stuff, and she keeps giving Trump low hanging fruit to use to deflect attention from his shortcomings.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?