• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World's largest marine reserve created off Hawaii

Which is more important to you; Environment or Economy?

  • Environment

    Votes: 8 72.7%
  • Economy

    Votes: 3 27.3%

  • Total voters
    11

What the hell do you think happens to food prices when you take loads of it off the market to make biofuel???????

The poor starve slowly off camera.

Except that isn't really what is happening. It is true that food waste is used to produce biofuel, but emphasis on the word waste. They're using things that either never made it to market or did and was subsequently thrown into the garbage. So the bone you want to pick is really with the fact that many billions of tons of edible food are being thrown into the trash every year not with the people doing something with that waste.
 

Don't they go hand and hand...environment and economy?
 

Man, you love your stereotypes and straw men.

Between "The unexamined life is not worth living" and "Ignorance is bliss," it's obvious you've chosen the latter.

As to the poll in the OP, I didn't vote. We can have both.
 

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/biofuelsAndWorldHunger.php

This was the first site that I found and it says 30 million into hunger and 100 million into poverty.

I have no clue as to how they arrived at such low figures. The poorest billion people live on less than $1.25 a day. These are mostly landless. Those with land, enough to live off, are the next billion up. The impact of useing corn and other food stuffs for making fuel for cars has been a price rise of between 40% and 70%.

Obviously I consider it highly unlikely that only 100 million people are pushed into a situation where they are unable to afford to send their kids to school by the difference in food costs due to this. I may be wrong. I hope so. But still 100 million people into abject poverty and 30 million into hunger.... well done Greenpeace.

Any chance of a trial for crimes against humanity? I doubt it as it's only poor people being affected and why would politicains care about them?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/apr/22/biofuel.crisis
 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jan/22/quarter-us-grain-biofuels-food

Wake up!

One quarter of US grain crops fed to cars - not people, new figures show
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…